Moonchesteri wrote:The link ain't working for me...?
Fish111 wrote:Old news, we had a good moan about this the other day, we're all over it now.
viewtopic.php?f=119&t=27163
Abu Dhabi wrote:Couldn't you argue that if a team is leading in the swamp they'll try and waste a bit more time than the case if U***d was leading?
Dubaimancityfan wrote:Abu Dhabi wrote:Couldn't you argue that if a team is leading in the swamp they'll try and waste a bit more time than the case if U***d was leading?
Hi AD, still in Newcastle or back home?
I'm not sure what yr point is but there is no time added for legetimate time wasting such as playing the ball back to yr GK or taking the ball to the corner flag and try to get a throw in or foul against the opposing team. Unfortunately we did not do that in injury time and kept giving th ball back to the Scum.
Abu Dhabi wrote:Dubaimancityfan wrote:Abu Dhabi wrote:Couldn't you argue that if a team is leading in the swamp they'll try and waste a bit more time than the case if U***d was leading?
Hi AD, still in Newcastle or back home?
I'm not sure what yr point is but there is no time added for legetimate time wasting such as playing the ball back to yr GK or taking the ball to the corner flag and try to get a throw in or foul against the opposing team. Unfortunately we did not do that in injury time and kept giving th ball back to the Scum.
Hi Dubai, I've been back home all summer, just currently in Newcastle untill tomorrow, finishing some matters, then back home.
I know there is no added time for legetimate time wasting but I meant things like slow goal kicks/throw ins , pretending injury etc..
Lesser teams would do a bit of it if they were leading in the swamp eventually, meaning the average extra 60 seconds rags get are understandble. Thats regarding the logic of the study though. They do get extratime sometimes no doubt about it .
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: gmercer1, ian494, johnny crossan, Nickyboy, nottsblue, salford city and 267 guests