Moonchesteri wrote:What's that all about? ARse 44years for example?
Beeks wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:What's that all about? ARse 44years for example?
It means that through there history Arsenal have gone 44 years without winning a trophy
Alioune DVToure wrote:Are Wigan only 78 years old? I'm certain they've never won a major trophy. They were non-league about 20 years ago.
Redna wrote:To futher mess things up here is the alternative table as for today.
54 Man Utd -1
53
52
51
50 Arsenal -1
49 Man City
48
47
46
45
44 Chelsea -1,Tottenham -1
43
42
41
40
39
38 Liverpool
37 Sunderland
36
35
34
33 Bolton, Stoke -1
32
31 Newcastle -1, Blackburn
30 Fulham, Everton -1
29 Aston Villa
28 Blackpool -1
27 Birmingham -2
26 WBA -1, Wigan
25
24 West Ham, Wolves -1
23
22
21
20
Redna wrote:It's a sort of 2 dimensional table. Points to the left and the odd - is less games played.
3 pts for a win narrow things.
CTID!!
john68 wrote:Funny ain't it...How the rags, media and even many City fans have this stupid belief that the rags were always the big successful club.
They won their 1st honours on the back of taking almost half a team of CITY players after they had been banned from playing for City in the 1900s.
After that, their greatest success was dodging the fuclin bailiffs and digging out enough money to pay a pittance to their players.
It only changed post ww2, after City had allowed them to play at Maine Road (worst thing we ever did) and the post war City fans turned up in droves, thus financing their rebuilding under Busby.
In the 1920s, we even vetoed another Manchester club from entering the league to save their existance.
In the 1900s, City officials and players turned up and donated money to them at a fuclin "jumble sale", the rags were holding to raise money.
I never get tired of telling them that they have now returned to their roots and their true heritage....MASSIVE DEBT.
City fans should understand just how big our club was back in the day and also understand that we are returning to our roots and heritage....GLORY....and...SUCCESS. It's how it always was.
Alioune DVToure wrote:Redna wrote:It's a sort of 2 dimensional table. Points to the left and the odd - is less games played.
3 pts for a win narrow things.
CTID!!
Hahaha I get it now. I just don't get how it's more straightforward than a normal league table.Takes up more room and gives you less information. You absolute nutjob - what a waste of five minutes!
john68 wrote:Funny ain't it...How the rags, media and even many City fans have this stupid belief that the rags were always the big successful club.
They won their 1st honours on the back of taking almost half a team of CITY players after they had been banned from playing for City in the 1900s.
After that, their greatest success was dodging the fuclin bailiffs and digging out enough money to pay a pittance to their players.
It only changed post ww2, after City had allowed them to play at Maine Road (worst thing we ever did) and the post war City fans turned up in droves, thus financing their rebuilding under Busby.
In the 1920s, we even vetoed another Manchester club from entering the league to save their existance.
In the 1900s, City officials and players turned up and donated money to them at a fuclin "jumble sale", the rags were holding to raise money.
I never get tired of telling them that they have now returned to their roots and their true heritage....MASSIVE DEBT.
City fans should understand just how big our club was back in the day and also understand that we are returning to our roots and heritage....GLORY....and...SUCCESS. It's how it always was.
DoomMerchant wrote:john68 wrote:Funny ain't it...How the rags, media and even many City fans have this stupid belief that the rags were always the big successful club.
They won their 1st honours on the back of taking almost half a team of CITY players after they had been banned from playing for City in the 1900s.
After that, their greatest success was dodging the fuclin bailiffs and digging out enough money to pay a pittance to their players.
It only changed post ww2, after City had allowed them to play at Maine Road (worst thing we ever did) and the post war City fans turned up in droves, thus financing their rebuilding under Busby.
In the 1920s, we even vetoed another Manchester club from entering the league to save their existance.
In the 1900s, City officials and players turned up and donated money to them at a fuclin "jumble sale", the rags were holding to raise money.
I never get tired of telling them that they have now returned to their roots and their true heritage....MASSIVE DEBT.
City fans should understand just how big our club was back in the day and also understand that we are returning to our roots and heritage....GLORY....and...SUCCESS. It's how it always was.
i <3 you old man.
cheers
Mase wrote:There's a trophy in both of these pics:
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Nigels Tackle, salford city and 211 guests