The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:24 am

CityFanFromRome wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:No. I was hoping for at least 3rd spot, which means finishing above Chelsea. They have been playing worse than us on the whole, werte fucking diabolical v Liverpool & have been underperforming & average all season.None of their players are used to struggling for 4th, they're used to fighting for trophies. A defeat last night would have put them under immense pressure & been a shot in the arm for us. They needed something like last night in order to kick them into gear. They got it; ahuge psychological boost which gives their multi trophy winning players a goal to aim for.

If they beat us, we may well be looking at a table with Spurs & Chelsea ahead of us the next day. Who will be favourites for 4th then? Us? We'll take points from Anfield & Goodison & beat Spurs at home for sure?

Our job just became much much harder.

Who gives a fuck though, so long as Utd didn't win. We can have the satisfaction of them winning the league with 3 less points, which is so important..

I see where you're coming from Ted but I think you're being a bit too negative here. Liverpool and Everton are two games we can win, Everton lost at home to fucking Reading yesterday, FFS, and Liverpool have been average all season; Anfield will lift them but only so much. As for Spurs, it's a tough game for sure but by then we might have recovered our form. As for the Chelsea game, they didn't impress me at all last night and I believe we can at least draw with them, which would defuse part of the scenario you described.

Winning tonight can give us that psychological boost we need to get back into form.


We CAN beat anybody, however we haven't beaten ANY kind of decent team home or away since the home game v Chelsea & that was a backs to the wall tactical battle. We tend to pick up most of our points against poor teams & our game v Fulham was crucial because of that. The Fulham result meant we now have to get those points back. Rags beating Chelsea would have given us back those points as far as our competition with Chelsea is concerned. The fact that they won, means that, if we want to finish above them, we will have to play better, against tougher teams, than we have done pretty much all season. I recon the same thing will apply if we want to finish above Spurs too, so we need both of those teams to lose whenever possible.

We are undoubtably capable of doing it but we were undoubtably capable of beating Birmingham (twice), Blackburn, Wolves, Villa, Sunderland, Stoke, Everton, Fulham, Poznan, Aris, Notts County & Leicester. All teams who have got results against us so far.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:44 am

I'm with Ted.
We had five very winnable home games which should have been how we get most of the points towards the 70 ish we need.
It was a disaster dropping two so cheaply. Plus it gives hope to visiting teams in the near future.
As for the game against Arsenal away last season it still stands as one of the biggest black marks against Mancini. Pathetic effort.
City and sniffing knickers.
Come on Blues.
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Chinners » Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:46 am

As I've said before it's what we do that matters. Relying on other teams to lose is no way to approach football (granted it certainly helps at periods in the season) but after 38 games is when it all matters. Chelsea winning against the rags will be an irrelevance after the next 3 games ... It's going to the last couple of games again I reckon
Image
User avatar
Chinners
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Hampton Court Palace
Supporter of: B*ll*x
My favourite player is: Kun Tueart

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Beefymcfc » Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:59 am

Ted Hughes wrote:Imo, we're so used to being shite & not competing for anything that we don't even realise the importance of games, when it's staring us in the face. The (lack of) atmosphere v Fulham showed how nobody truly realised how much we needed the 3 points. Likewise the pathetic joy taken in our biggest rivals for a Champ's Lg spot taking 3 points off the rags last night, is going right over everyone's heads. We're so used to being fucking losers that we don't look at fixtures as 'must win' for us & 'must lose' for other teams. We just sail through life expecting things will somehow work out.

A rags victory would have given us a real buffer against them.

This is where we differ again mate, I've never thought we were shite. All my time being a City supporter I've thought of us as Battlers and even now I'm of the same opinion. We're going through a tough run of fixtures and seemingly having to use players that wouldn't normally be used together, but we still battle through whilst under orders to keep the formation.

As for atmosphere, it started off really well with the SS and East corner going at each other but the lack of away support made it impossible to keep going. Combined with the opposition taking it to us it left people in a very uncomfortable position, worrying about the outcome (and CL place) instead of us just enjoying the game and having a bit of a gas.

Oh, and as mentioned, it's nowt to do with wanting the Rags to lose, that's just an added bonus, it's about actually wanting us to win instead of seeing some shite performances from a fantastic squad. Is that too much to ask? Or, in your view, we should start every season hoping that every team draw games and one of our opposition loses for us to make it. It should never be about what other teams do, it should only be about us, surely?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:02 pm

Chinners wrote:As I've said before it's what we do that matters. Relying on other teams to lose is no way to approach football (granted it certainly helps at periods in the season) but after 38 games is when it all matters. Chelsea winning against the rags will be an irrelevance after the next 3 games ... It's going to the last couple of games again I reckon


All teams worry about the opposition. Remember pubs full of rags patting us on the back when we got back from beating Leeds 4-0?

If the opposition win every week, you're fucked, someone has to beat them & most teams don't. We'll be even more worried about the opposition if we start challenging for the league & may need the rags to beat an opponent then too. There are only so many games the likes of Chelsea play per season, when you'd say they are quite likely to lose. That was one of them. It may be that we'll be relying on the rags to beat someone in order for us to win the league in the coming years. It happens like that all the time.

That's how it is from now one & it's about time we grew up & realised it.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Beefymcfc » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:05 pm

Well Ted, at least we're safe in the knowledge that United didn't get any further ahead of us. We've still got a shot at the title.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:09 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:Well Ted, at least we're safe in the knowledge that United didn't get any further ahead of us. We've still got a shot at the title.


We don't have enough games left.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:12 pm

On SSN this morning they showed a graphic of Arsenal's remaining games and they certainly looked to have the easier run in. Admittedly I didn't study it in great detail.
If The Arse were to beat the shite when they meet at The Emirates, they would be quite clear favourites.
City and sniffing knickers.
Come on Blues.
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Chinners » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:16 pm

All teams worry about the opposition. Remember pubs full of rags patting us on the back when we got back from beating Leeds 4-0?


And in the end it made no difference did it! If we win our remaining games it doesn't matter what Chelsea do. Big ask but that the way I see football
Image
User avatar
Chinners
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Hampton Court Palace
Supporter of: B*ll*x
My favourite player is: Kun Tueart

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:25 pm

Chinners wrote:
All teams worry about the opposition. Remember pubs full of rags patting us on the back when we got back from beating Leeds 4-0?


And in the end it made no difference did it! If we win our remaining games it doesn't matter what Chelsea do. Big ask but that the way I see football


No it didn't but that's how teams at the top always view things, the points are far more important than local rivalry. Most City fans will learn to look at it the the same way.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Chinners » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:36 pm

Yeah I certainly agree about the points thing, which is why I said IF we win all our remaining games we'll be fine and will not matter what Chelsea or Spurs do.
Image
User avatar
Chinners
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Hampton Court Palace
Supporter of: B*ll*x
My favourite player is: Kun Tueart

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:48 pm

Chinners wrote:Yeah I certainly agree about the points thing, which is why I said IF we win all our remaining games we'll be fine and will not matter what Chelsea or Spurs do.


I don't think anyone will win all their remaining games, therefore all 4 places will be decided on who loses & to whom.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby Beefymcfc » Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:03 pm

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:On SSN this morning they showed a graphic of Arsenal's remaining games and they certainly looked to have the easier run in. Admittedly I didn't study it in great detail.
If The Arse were to beat the shite when they meet at The Emirates, they would be quite clear favourites.

I had the Arse to win it at the start of the season and still had the same opinion up until this week. The only concern for them is the number of 1st team injuries they have and the loss of key players such as Fabragarse and van Pussy may see them go through one of those slides that they normally have. I think United will start to feel the pinch soon as well so anything could happen.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: The Chelsea v Rags Quandry

Postby john68 » Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:51 pm

You are right on the money Ted...and City fans have to change the mid table mentality, where it's good to grab a well earned point at difficult places to a winning mentality, where a draw anywhere means 2pts dropped.

In mid table dropping 2 pts while all the rest are doing similar is not usually a problem.
At the top, those around us rarely drop points and every point gained is gold dust and precious.

Wherever and whenever, we have to go out to win.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: C & C, CTID Hants, Mase, Stan and 150 guests