Ted Hughes wrote:If it remains so then it will be a decent but not spectacular season as far as the league goes. 'Decent but not specatacular' would be a reasonable description of his tenure so far. I think he MAY have been an improvement on Hughes but so far, it's very very close & there isn't a conclusive argument for either. I'm not sure we wouldn't be further down the line now if we'd never brought him in but equally, I have hopes that in the end he'll take us further than Hughes would have been able to & build a more solid team.
I have a big problem with this 'tired' crap though. It's very negative & is giving an excuse for failure. If 'tiredness' is allowed to ruin our season, I want him out. Everyone else has the same problems every year & we've had the time & money to sort it. If he can't plan for it & deal with it, he's not good enough.
Chinners wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:If it remains so then it will be a decent but not spectacular season as far as the league goes. 'Decent but not specatacular' would be a reasonable description of his tenure so far. I think he MAY have been an improvement on Hughes but so far, it's very very close & there isn't a conclusive argument for either. I'm not sure we wouldn't be further down the line now if we'd never brought him in but equally, I have hopes that in the end he'll take us further than Hughes would have been able to & build a more solid team.
I have a big problem with this 'tired' crap though. It's very negative & is giving an excuse for failure. If 'tiredness' is allowed to ruin our season, I want him out. Everyone else has the same problems every year & we've had the time & money to sort it. If he can't plan for it & deal with it, he's not good enough.
Spot on Ted, agree with all of that tbh
Ted Hughes wrote:If it remains so then it will be a decent but not spectacular season as far as the league goes. 'Decent but not specatacular' would be a reasonable description of his tenure so far. I think he MAY have been an improvement on Hughes but so far, it's very very close & there isn't a conclusive argument for either. I'm not sure we wouldn't be further down the line now if we'd never brought him in but equally, I have hopes that in the end he'll take us further than Hughes would have been able to & build a more solid team.
I have a big problem with this 'tired' crap though. It's very negative & is giving an excuse for failure. If 'tiredness' is allowed to ruin our season, I want him out. Everyone else has the same problems every year & we've had the time & money to sort it. If he can't plan for it & deal with it, he's not good enough.
BobKowalski wrote:...........His man management skills are non existent.......
MaineRoadMemories wrote:BobKowalski wrote:...........His man management skills are non existent.......
That's the point of it for me. With United, Arsenal and Chelsea all faltering at some point this season if Mancini believed in his players more, had conviction in a winning mentality against the teams around us in the table and did not piss half of the 25 man squad off to other clubs during the transfer windows we would be sitting top of the league this evening.
... and people would still be moaning.MaineRoadMemories wrote:BobKowalski wrote:...........His man management skills are non existent.......
That's the point of it for me. With United, Arsenal and Chelsea all faltering at some point this season if Mancini believed in his players more, had conviction in a winning mentality against the teams around us in the table and did not piss half of the 25 man squad off to other clubs during the transfer windows we would be sitting top of the league this evening.
Original Dub wrote:Chinners wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:If it remains so then it will be a decent but not spectacular season as far as the league goes. 'Decent but not specatacular' would be a reasonable description of his tenure so far. I think he MAY have been an improvement on Hughes but so far, it's very very close & there isn't a conclusive argument for either. I'm not sure we wouldn't be further down the line now if we'd never brought him in but equally, I have hopes that in the end he'll take us further than Hughes would have been able to & build a more solid team.
I have a big problem with this 'tired' crap though. It's very negative & is giving an excuse for failure. If 'tiredness' is allowed to ruin our season, I want him out. Everyone else has the same problems every year & we've had the time & money to sort it. If he can't plan for it & deal with it, he's not good enough.
Spot on Ted, agree with all of that tbh
Aye, count me in too. That is exactly how I feel.
ashton287 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Chinners wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:If it remains so then it will be a decent but not spectacular season as far as the league goes. 'Decent but not specatacular' would be a reasonable description of his tenure so far. I think he MAY have been an improvement on Hughes but so far, it's very very close & there isn't a conclusive argument for either. I'm not sure we wouldn't be further down the line now if we'd never brought him in but equally, I have hopes that in the end he'll take us further than Hughes would have been able to & build a more solid team.
I have a big problem with this 'tired' crap though. It's very negative & is giving an excuse for failure. If 'tiredness' is allowed to ruin our season, I want him out. Everyone else has the same problems every year & we've had the time & money to sort it. If he can't plan for it & deal with it, he's not good enough.
Spot on Ted, agree with all of that tbh
Aye, count me in too. That is exactly how I feel.
Have any of you played football recently? I doubt there is anyone on here that could play twice a week and not be affected atall. They might be payed to play but there still human and there playing at the highest level there is.
If we win a trophy this season how many of you will remember this season for the rest of your life? If we get into the CL how many people will see this as the beginning of something spectacular? I think maybe you should all save your judgements till the END of this 'decent' season.
King Kev wrote:... and people would still be moaning.MaineRoadMemories wrote:BobKowalski wrote:...........His man management skills are non existent.......
That's the point of it for me. With United, Arsenal and Chelsea all faltering at some point this season if Mancini believed in his players more, had conviction in a winning mentality against the teams around us in the table and did not piss half of the 25 man squad off to other clubs during the transfer windows we would be sitting top of the league this evening.
ashton287 wrote:King Kev wrote:... and people would still be moaning.MaineRoadMemories wrote:BobKowalski wrote:...........His man management skills are non existent.......
That's the point of it for me. With United, Arsenal and Chelsea all faltering at some point this season if Mancini believed in his players more, had conviction in a winning mentality against the teams around us in the table and did not piss half of the 25 man squad off to other clubs during the transfer windows we would be sitting top of the league this evening.
So they can all faulter, but if mancini's squad has a bad patch/result in his first full season as manager its a problem?
Doesnt matter who the manager is or who is in the team there will always be results that go against you.
Fesan wrote:ashton287 wrote:Original Dub wrote:Chinners wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:If it remains so then it will be a decent but not spectacular season as far as the league goes. 'Decent but not specatacular' would be a reasonable description of his tenure so far. I think he MAY have been an improvement on Hughes but so far, it's very very close & there isn't a conclusive argument for either. I'm not sure we wouldn't be further down the line now if we'd never brought him in but equally, I have hopes that in the end he'll take us further than Hughes would have been able to & build a more solid team.
I have a big problem with this 'tired' crap though. It's very negative & is giving an excuse for failure. If 'tiredness' is allowed to ruin our season, I want him out. Everyone else has the same problems every year & we've had the time & money to sort it. If he can't plan for it & deal with it, he's not good enough.
Spot on Ted, agree with all of that tbh
Aye, count me in too. That is exactly how I feel.
Have any of you played football recently? I doubt there is anyone on here that could play twice a week and not be affected atall. They might be payed to play but there still human and there playing at the highest level there is.
If we win a trophy this season how many of you will remember this season for the rest of your life? If we get into the CL how many people will see this as the beginning of something spectacular? I think maybe you should all save your judgements till the END of this 'decent' season.
Sure we will, but can you honestly see Mancini do well in CL? I mean if we can barely keep up now how will it be when the match in the week is not Aris but Real Madrid?
After looking at the other sides in the PL and how they play with what is clearly worse squads I am beginning to think he is not doing well enough to get the maximum out of our squad. We are in the top four because others have gone backwards, not because we've gone forward. Unless things change towards the summer I'll honestly be hoping for someone else, even though it makes me sad:-( We are playing sad, sad football and I'd take it if we won the league. But playing bad and not winning enough is just ... sad.
Let's hope he turns things around real quick!
ashton287 wrote:
Iv been waiting 24 years, i can wait a few more seasons to be the best team in the world.
Rome wasnt built in a day and all that.
Also who is going to replace him? Lets get murinho to win us a title and then go backwards the day he sells us out for his next "challenge"(rich as fuck club that isnt really a challenge atall)
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], salford city and 208 guests