Mourinho at City

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

At what point would you allow Mourinho to manage City?

Dont want him
25
19%
If City come 5thd and dip out on the FA Cup
33
25%
Fifth and FA Cup Final
4
3%
Fifth and Win the FA Cup
6
4%
Fourth and a Semi Loss
6
4%
Fourth and a Final
0
No votes
Fourth and the cup
2
1%
Regardless of where we finish
58
43%
 
Total votes : 134

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:00 am

Feed The Goat wrote:
ENIAM NAM wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Fucking laughable to say that we should sack Mancini if he wins FA Cup.

I'd take Mourinho IF we could somehow trick him into coming IF we didn't make it to top 4 or win FA Cup.

I could understand this if people were talking about someone who plays attractive football but Mourinho doesn't. I could very well deal with Jose's football because he gets results but whingers who say that we should sack Mancini if he wins FA Cup to get Mourinho to win FA Cup are foolish.


To be fair, we won't draw Leicester/Notts County/2nd string Villa & Reading every year! The semi will be our first real test.

With that draw I would like to think any manager would get us to this stage of the competition with the players we have.

But in the past we have failed at shit teams.


But in the past we haven't spunked the sort of cash we have now for the squad we have now.
City and sniffing knickers.
Come on Blues.
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby john68 » Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:23 am

Piccs,
For fucks sake...how long does it take for you to fucking realise that momney only buys you players...teams are built over time.
MONEY HAS GOT NEXT TO FUCK ALL TO BUY SUCCESS...IT IS ALMOST IRRELEVENT, UNLESS THE POLAYERS YOU BUY ARE ALLOWED TO BE MADE INTO A TEAM.
When you start to fucking understand that...you are starting to mentally progress on this.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Wooders » Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:31 am

john68 wrote:Piccs,
For fucks sake...how long does it take for you to fucking realise that momney only buys you players...teams are built over time.
MONEY HAS GOT NEXT TO FUCK ALL TO BUY SUCCESS...IT IS ALMOST IRRELEVENT, UNLESS THE POLAYERS YOU BUY ARE ALLOWED TO BE MADE INTO A TEAM.
When you start to fucking understand that...you are starting to mentally progress on this.


but you do need to play players to their strengths - not just cram them into a system ala bobby
Citys new Motto "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women"
Wooders
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15700
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: UK
Supporter of: City

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Blue Since 76 » Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:59 pm

Paco Gento wrote:Mourinho won't leave before his contract run out. Yesterday he said he won't mind signing another one if the club want. Such quotes probably will not make the British press but be sure that he is not leaving any time soon. Pérez defended him last week in the media and Pérez never speak to the media. Most of all, Mourinho has the fans on his side which makes him untouchable.


If he wins nothing, which is a possibility, he'll be sacked. If he wins something, he might well decide he's proved himself in yet another country and be willing to walk. He'd probably cost about £20m in compensation, but if you're willing to spend that and more on a player, why wouldn't you spend it on a manager as well?

More worrying, is if Mancini goes, which is a distinct possibility, we need a new manager. Surely next time we'll want someone with premier league experience, but who has also won things in England and in European football. I can only think of three names - Taggart, Mourinho and Benitez. Can't see us going for Taggart, so we're down to two. What if Mourinho says no...
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby dazby » Thu Mar 24, 2011 1:01 pm

Going off the poll results it seems there are 3 distinct groups. The group that want him regardless, the group that dont want him at all, and those that want him if Mancio misses the target and the cup. Interesting.
Attack the argument of the person, not the person of the argument- except Carl.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Paco Gento » Thu Mar 24, 2011 2:13 pm

Blue Since 76 wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:Mourinho won't leave before his contract run out. Yesterday he said he won't mind signing another one if the club want. Such quotes probably will not make the British press but be sure that he is not leaving any time soon. Pérez defended him last week in the media and Pérez never speak to the media. Most of all, Mourinho has the fans on his side which makes him untouchable.


If he wins nothing, which is a possibility, he'll be sacked. If he wins something, he might well decide he's proved himself in yet another country and be willing to walk. He'd probably cost about £20m in compensation, but if you're willing to spend that and more on a player, why wouldn't you spend it on a manager as well?

More worrying, is if Mancini goes, which is a distinct possibility, we need a new manager. Surely next time we'll want someone with premier league experience, but who has also won things in England and in European football. I can only think of three names - Taggart, Mourinho and Benitez. Can't see us going for Taggart, so we're down to two. What if Mourinho says no...


He can't be sacked because the members who own the club are behind him. Pérez said he will stay longer than 4 years and Mourinho said he doesn't mind signing another contract. Even if Pérez wasn't on Mourinho' side, Pérez has no saying in this because his head can be demanded any time of the day. We aren't plc, Pérez and Valdano are just employees like the rest of the members.
Paco Gento
De Michelis's Pace
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:07 pm
Location: Madrid, España
Supporter of: Real Madrid Castilla
My favourite player is: Butragueño

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:05 pm

Blue Since 76 wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:Mourinho won't leave before his contract run out. Yesterday he said he won't mind signing another one if the club want. Such quotes probably will not make the British press but be sure that he is not leaving any time soon. Pérez defended him last week in the media and Pérez never speak to the media. Most of all, Mourinho has the fans on his side which makes him untouchable.


If he wins nothing, which is a possibility, he'll be sacked. If he wins something, he might well decide he's proved himself in yet another country and be willing to walk. He'd probably cost about £20m in compensation, but if you're willing to spend that and more on a player, why wouldn't you spend it on a manager as well?

More worrying, is if Mancini goes, which is a distinct possibility, we need a new manager. Surely next time we'll want someone with premier league experience, but who has also won things in England and in European football. I can only think of three names - Taggart, Mourinho and Benitez. Can't see us going for Taggart, so we're down to two. What if Mourinho says no...


That's it isn't it. People keep throwing Mourinho's name around like he'd be sure to join us. I don't think he would come. Who else is there? Complete and utter joke like Benitez?

Although I'm sure loads of people would want Steve Bruce or someone like that.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby avoidconfusion » Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:18 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
That's it isn't it. People keep throwing Mourinho's name around like he'd be sure to join us. I don't think he would come. Who else is there? Complete and utter joke like Benitez?

Although I'm sure loads of people would want Steve Bruce or someone like that.



Mick McCarthy!!!!
so now as every enemy circles our city
sour and sore, we swear war
User avatar
avoidconfusion
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:20 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Mad Zabba

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby lets all have a disco » Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:22 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Blue Since 76 wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:Mourinho won't leave before his contract run out. Yesterday he said he won't mind signing another one if the club want. Such quotes probably will not make the British press but be sure that he is not leaving any time soon. Pérez defended him last week in the media and Pérez never speak to the media. Most of all, Mourinho has the fans on his side which makes him untouchable.


If he wins nothing, which is a possibility, he'll be sacked. If he wins something, he might well decide he's proved himself in yet another country and be willing to walk. He'd probably cost about £20m in compensation, but if you're willing to spend that and more on a player, why wouldn't you spend it on a manager as well?

More worrying, is if Mancini goes, which is a distinct possibility, we need a new manager. Surely next time we'll want someone with premier league experience, but who has also won things in England and in European football. I can only think of three names - Taggart, Mourinho and Benitez. Can't see us going for Taggart, so we're down to two. What if Mourinho says no...


That's it isn't it. People keep throwing Mourinho's name around like he'd be sure to join us. I don't think he would come. Who else is there? Complete and utter joke like Benitez?

Although I'm sure loads of people would want Steve Bruce or someone like that.


Ruud Gullit.


To be fair Benitez has won more pots than Bob and in different countries.

That is all.
He was never me,me,me but always you,you,you
User avatar
lets all have a disco
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22479
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:20 pm
Location: Blue Army
Supporter of: Manchester City FC
My favourite player is: STILL MICAH RICHARDS

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Alioune DVToure » Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:50 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Blue Since 76 wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:Mourinho won't leave before his contract run out. Yesterday he said he won't mind signing another one if the club want. Such quotes probably will not make the British press but be sure that he is not leaving any time soon. Pérez defended him last week in the media and Pérez never speak to the media. Most of all, Mourinho has the fans on his side which makes him untouchable.


If he wins nothing, which is a possibility, he'll be sacked. If he wins something, he might well decide he's proved himself in yet another country and be willing to walk. He'd probably cost about £20m in compensation, but if you're willing to spend that and more on a player, why wouldn't you spend it on a manager as well?

More worrying, is if Mancini goes, which is a distinct possibility, we need a new manager. Surely next time we'll want someone with premier league experience, but who has also won things in England and in European football. I can only think of three names - Taggart, Mourinho and Benitez. Can't see us going for Taggart, so we're down to two. What if Mourinho says no...


That's it isn't it. People keep throwing Mourinho's name around like he'd be sure to join us. I don't think he would come. Who else is there? Complete and utter joke like Benitez?

Although I'm sure loads of people would want [highlight]Steve Bruce or someone like that[/highlight].


Give another example so we know exactly what you mean by "someone like that" :)
Image
Alioune DVToure
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6335
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:14 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:53 pm

lets all have a disco wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Blue Since 76 wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:Mourinho won't leave before his contract run out. Yesterday he said he won't mind signing another one if the club want. Such quotes probably will not make the British press but be sure that he is not leaving any time soon. Pérez defended him last week in the media and Pérez never speak to the media. Most of all, Mourinho has the fans on his side which makes him untouchable.


If he wins nothing, which is a possibility, he'll be sacked. If he wins something, he might well decide he's proved himself in yet another country and be willing to walk. He'd probably cost about £20m in compensation, but if you're willing to spend that and more on a player, why wouldn't you spend it on a manager as well?

More worrying, is if Mancini goes, which is a distinct possibility, we need a new manager. Surely next time we'll want someone with premier league experience, but who has also won things in England and in European football. I can only think of three names - Taggart, Mourinho and Benitez. Can't see us going for Taggart, so we're down to two. What if Mourinho says no...


That's it isn't it. People keep throwing Mourinho's name around like he'd be sure to join us. I don't think he would come. Who else is there? Complete and utter joke like Benitez?

Although I'm sure loads of people would want Steve Bruce or someone like that.


Ruud Gullit.


To be fair Benitez has won more pots than Bob and in different countries.

That is all.


I hope your joking with that Benitez comment. Bobby ain't doing all too well right now but Benitez is garbage.

Gullit would be great for comedy value. He'd bench Silva and Tevez, buy few Dutch scrubs and we'd have no tactics. We'd be shit but at least it would be funny. I think.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Paco Gento » Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:57 pm

The 'Hitler of Brazilians' Van Gaal can be a good option for City. 442/433 attacking football, he will get rid of anything slow and lazy and will reshape you in no time. One thing you can't argue about him is everywhere he worked the clubs immediately made a huge progress. Discipline in the squad will improve too and he will cost nothing.
Paco Gento
De Michelis's Pace
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:07 pm
Location: Madrid, España
Supporter of: Real Madrid Castilla
My favourite player is: Butragueño

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby CityFanFromRome » Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:05 pm

What about Ancelotti? I don't think he'll stay at Chelsea unless he wins the CL, he has Prem experience having won it last season and European experience having won the CL twice with Milan. He's touted to go to Roma if he leaves Chelsea, he's the main target of the new owners which should arrive there next week, but you never know, he may want to prove a point to Abramovich if he does get sacked by the Russian.
User avatar
CityFanFromRome
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5129
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: Rome
Supporter of: Man City & Roma
My favourite player is: Carlos Tévez

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:06 pm

Paco Gento wrote:The 'Hitler of Brazilians' Van Gaal can be a good option for City. 442/433 attacking football, he will get rid of anything slow and lazy and will reshape you in no time. One thing you can't argue about him is everywhere he worked the clubs immediately made a huge progress. Discipline in the squad will improve too and he will cost nothing.


Van Gaal I'd take. In fact, he has always been one of my favourites.

However van Gaal comes with his own set of problems. A) That'd mean ANOTHER complete squad revamp. We got SO many players that doesn't suit his system ie team first and foremost.... no bullshit. B) He is "My way or the highway" character. The complicated structure of our Club with strong director of football etc wouldn't necesserily suit him. C) When Taggart retires, van Gaal has always been number one to take over so this could REALLY lead into embarrasing situation.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Paco Gento » Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:11 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:The 'Hitler of Brazilians' Van Gaal can be a good option for City. 442/433 attacking football, he will get rid of anything slow and lazy and will reshape you in no time. One thing you can't argue about him is everywhere he worked the clubs immediately made a huge progress. Discipline in the squad will improve too and he will cost nothing.


Van Gaal I'd take. In fact, he has always been one of my favourites.

However van Gaal comes with his own set of problems. A) That'd mean ANOTHER complete squad revamp. We got SO many players that doesn't suit his system ie team first and foremost.... no bullshit. B) He is "My way or the highway" character. The complicated structure of our Club with strong director of football etc wouldn't necesserily suit him. C) When Taggart retires, van Gaal has always been number one to take over so this could REALLY lead into embarrasing situation.


Do you have a director of football? I thought in England things worked differently and the coach had control over almost everything.

You think he will take over drunk old trog? Fungus will appoint some of his muppet Neville, Giggs, Scholes etc so he can control the club even if not still officially a manager.
Paco Gento
De Michelis's Pace
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:07 pm
Location: Madrid, España
Supporter of: Real Madrid Castilla
My favourite player is: Butragueño

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:13 pm

Paco Gento wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:The 'Hitler of Brazilians' Van Gaal can be a good option for City. 442/433 attacking football, he will get rid of anything slow and lazy and will reshape you in no time. One thing you can't argue about him is everywhere he worked the clubs immediately made a huge progress. Discipline in the squad will improve too and he will cost nothing.


Van Gaal I'd take. In fact, he has always been one of my favourites.

However van Gaal comes with his own set of problems. A) That'd mean ANOTHER complete squad revamp. We got SO many players that doesn't suit his system ie team first and foremost.... no bullshit. B) He is "My way or the highway" character. The complicated structure of our Club with strong director of football etc wouldn't necesserily suit him. C) When Taggart retires, van Gaal has always been number one to take over so this could REALLY lead into embarrasing situation.


Do you have a director of football? I thought in England things worked differently and the coach had control over almost everything.

You think he will take over drunk old trog? Fungus will appoint some of his muppet Neville, Giggs, Scholes etc so he can control the club even if not still officially a manager.


If my memory serves me, they offered van Gaal Rags job when Taggart was going to retire some seven years ago.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Paco Gento » Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:15 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Paco Gento wrote:The 'Hitler of Brazilians' Van Gaal can be a good option for City. 442/433 attacking football, he will get rid of anything slow and lazy and will reshape you in no time. One thing you can't argue about him is everywhere he worked the clubs immediately made a huge progress. Discipline in the squad will improve too and he will cost nothing.


Van Gaal I'd take. In fact, he has always been one of my favourites.

However van Gaal comes with his own set of problems. A) That'd mean ANOTHER complete squad revamp. We got SO many players that doesn't suit his system ie team first and foremost.... no bullshit. B) He is "My way or the highway" character. The complicated structure of our Club with strong director of football etc wouldn't necesserily suit him. C) When Taggart retires, van Gaal has always been number one to take over so this could REALLY lead into embarrasing situation.


Do you have a director of football? I thought in England things worked differently and the coach had control over almost everything.

You think he will take over drunk old trog? Fungus will appoint some of his muppet Neville, Giggs, Scholes etc so he can control the club even if not still officially a manager.


If my memory serves me, they offered van Gaal Rags job when Taggart was going to retire some seven years ago.


So it makes sense I didn't know this. I always thought the drunk old trog will only leave Man U in a wooden box and his successor will be chosen by him.
Paco Gento
De Michelis's Pace
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:07 pm
Location: Madrid, España
Supporter of: Real Madrid Castilla
My favourite player is: Butragueño

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby avoidconfusion » Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:51 am

Van Gaal did very well at Bayern too....
so now as every enemy circles our city
sour and sore, we swear war
User avatar
avoidconfusion
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:20 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Mad Zabba

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:56 am

avoidconfusion wrote:Van Gaal did very well at Bayern too....


I don't know if you are being sarcastic but he was excellent there last year. They haven't been doing well this season though.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mourinho at City

Postby mcfc1632 » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:14 pm

please please no - everything would be about him and very little about CITY and then he would fuck off and leave no legacy or momentum - total vanity signing to satisfy people that cannot think beyond the immediate and the press campaign (IMO) - of course they want him back - but they do not have the long term interests of CITY at heart
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: carolina-blue, city72, Hazy2, Majestic-12 [Bot], PeterParker and 143 guests