Daily Mail

[BobbyJ1956]

Two quotes:
(Even) the Duke of Edinburgh once said "the Daily Mail is a bloody awful newspaper."
On the other hand, from Harry Truman, "if you can't stand the heat ... " - you know the rest.

[dazby]

Sorry hadn't noticed this city related article from today... negative of course.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1390727/Manchester-Citys-Mario-Balotelli-nightclub-scuffle-Italy.html

So that's three negative stories in one day. Great journalism! Some poor little rag journo is not a happy chappy with the NKOTB (that's New Kids On The Block BTW and it takes nothing away from my coolness).

Well, keep adding all the bogies, solely from the Daily Fail in this thread... at this rate it should be hilarious come Christmas. And at that point, I'll email the cunts with a link to this thread :)

You have coolness? And if it wasn't a cat what was it?

[Avalon]

What's fucking ridiculous is that we have a topic on this... paper.

If there's one office that I'd like to see burned to the ground, or have some lunatic walk in and shoot everybody, it would be the Daily Mail office. They're an insult to everybody's intelligence and they're doing nothing but hatemongering and spitting falacies.

[ayrshireblue]

Great article in the main paper today about how Baconface is hated by all and the reasons why.

[Ted Hughes]

Great article in the main paper today about how Baconface is hated by all and the reasons why.

Haven't read it but there should be an article like that every fucking week. He's the one who tramples over journalists who dare to report anything he doesn't like the sound of. He's bullied & banned people for years yet most of the time, their colleagues kiss his arse rather than tell the truth about it, then stir up shit about us instead. That bastard should be getting hung drawn & qurtered in every paper every week, rather than us getting it. He has done enough to deserve it; we haven't.

[Ted Hughes]

Those who think we get a fair press compared to say the rags; Talksport just had Steve Curry (rag journo) spending ten minutes taking apart the piece criticising Ferguson & refuting most of the points mentioned, telling several million listeners that it's not true & what a great bloke Ferguson is, how warm & friendly he is 'if you know him' & that he does a lot for charity. Seriously. So now, that piece has actually been turned into an advert for Ferguson.

Would some journo do that for Mancini ? Would they fuck. They would put on some fucker who agrees & all join in slagging him off.

This is the difference. Sure, the rags get shit off the press, but they & the scousers & the usual suspects (Harry etc) then have a whole army of media people arguing their case & printing positive stuff to counter it. When we get shit, that same army jump on it & stick their knives in our back, whether it's true or not.

We do not get the same treatment as these people.

[Goaters 103]

Those who think we get a fair press compared to say the rags; Talksport just had Steve Curry (rag journo) spending ten minutes taking apart the piece criticising Ferguson & refuting most of the points mentioned, telling several million listeners that it's not true & what a great bloke Ferguson is, how warm & friendly he is 'if you know him' & that he does a lot for charity. Seriously. So now, that piece has actually been turned into an advert for Ferguson.

Would some journo do that for Mancini ? Would they fuck. They would put on some fucker who agrees & all join in slagging him off.

This is the difference. Sure, the rags get shit off the press, but they & the scousers & the usual suspects (Harry etc) then have a whole army of media people arguing their case & printing positive stuff to counter it. When we get shit, that same army jump on it & stick their knives in our back, whether it's true or not.

We do not get the same treatment as these people.

This.

That fat ponce Curry is so far up Ferguson's backside that you can see his nostrils whenever Baconface opens his gob. Oliver Holt in The Mirror (currently championing a return for Michael Owen to the England squad from Utd's 3rd team) and Mark Ogden in the Telegraph (slagging off City's parade, firstly stating it will be ruined by the weather, then ruined by Tevez no... oops he did come, so he then reverted to it being ruined by Balotelli not showing), are other examples of Utd worshippers who will do anything to spin the positive for Utd and stick the boot into City.

[guv111]

There does seem to be a bit of a theme at the Daily Mail (I hope none of you are eating):

Charitable Sir Alex Ferguson - Steven Defour is not the first to get a good luck message from the Manchester United boss

24: The story of Sir Alex Ferguson's amazing 24 years as United manager

Bit of a weird one here, even by Ferguson standards:

Sir Alex Ferguson warns Manchester United stars: Cross me and you'll die

Some sexy pics in this one about our man:

PICTURE SPECIAL: Life's a beach for Sir Alex Ferguson as the United boss kicks back on his holidays

[Foreverinbluedreams]

Myself and a another blue on Twitter are just having a go at Ian Ladyman for the shit the Mail is printing. Absolutely anything for a negative slant on anything at all.

Ian Ladyman is an absolute prick of the highest order and has had a massive anti-city agenda since the club served a banning order on him.

He can not bring himself to talk positively about our club even if we merit it and his supposed sources are "tomato" and "brown". Utter bullshit spreader of worst kind if their was any justice in the world he get sacked and never be allowed to work in the industry again.

Well done for giving him stick he bloody deserves it and much much more.

When did the club serve Ladyboy with a banning order?

He was given a press pass by City on the last two preseason tours and actually wrote some very positive stuff about us.

The way he's been writing recently however suggests that something must have happened between him and someone at the club.

[Ted Hughes]

Myself and a another blue on Twitter are just having a go at Ian Ladyman for the shit the Mail is printing. Absolutely anything for a negative slant on anything at all.

Ian Ladyman is an absolute prick of the highest order and has had a massive anti-city agenda since the club served a banning order on him.

He can not bring himself to talk positively about our club even if we merit it and his supposed sources are "tomato" and "brown". Utter bullshit spreader of worst kind if their was any justice in the world he get sacked and never be allowed to work in the industry again.

Well done for giving him stick he bloody deserves it and much much more.

When did the club serve Ladyboy with a banning order?

He was given a press pass by City on the last two preseason tours and actually wrote some very positive stuff about us.

The way he's been writing recently however suggests that something must have happened between him and someone at the club.

He was printing malicious shit about us in Hughes' day; really dreadful nasty bollocks, then did suddenly seem to change his tune for a while & be a lot more neutral. Perhaps Sir Alex has had a word & got him back on track.

[patrickblue]

Talking of bacon banning journos, have you seen this.

[youtube]jwkHHf7dYeo&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

[Goaters 103]

Finally a Daily Mail article I can agree with. It must be the banning of one of their reporters that has led to a truer picture of Baconface.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... -lout.html

[Dameerto]

Scargill in a tracksuit, hahahaha I never thought the Mail would make me laugh.