BlueinBosnia wrote:paulh wrote:hey my post was aimed at the previous posts regarding people carrying weight shouldnt wear shirts(which i think is bullshit) i was not bragging in the slightest
I didn't say they shouldn't wear shirts, but I do feel there's a time and a place (matches, the pub and slumming about in the garden, pretty much like you said) for them. I just said it wasn't for me, and that I think modern shirts hardly look spectacular on your average middle-age match attender. Vintage shirts often look fine, and the past two have seemed okay, too. However, the First Advice/Reebok one makes pretty much anyone look like a scruffy bugger, and this shirt is in a similar vein, in my opinion.
Dazzacity wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:paulh wrote:hey my post was aimed at the previous posts regarding people carrying weight shouldnt wear shirts(which i think is bullshit) i was not bragging in the slightest
I didn't say they shouldn't wear shirts, but I do feel there's a time and a place (matches, the pub and slumming about in the garden, pretty much like you said) for them. I just said it wasn't for me, and that I think modern shirts hardly look spectacular on your average middle-age match attender. Vintage shirts often look fine, and the past two have seemed okay, too. However, the First Advice/Reebok one makes pretty much anyone look like a scruffy bugger, and this shirt is in a similar vein, in my opinion.
My opinion is that your opinion is utter bollox !! who the fook are you to say what people should and shouldnt wear.
BlueinBosnia wrote:Dazzacity wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:paulh wrote:hey my post was aimed at the previous posts regarding people carrying weight shouldnt wear shirts(which i think is bullshit) i was not bragging in the slightest
I didn't say they shouldn't wear shirts, but I do feel there's a time and a place (matches, the pub and slumming about in the garden, pretty much like you said) for them. I just said it wasn't for me, and that I think modern shirts hardly look spectacular on your average middle-age match attender. Vintage shirts often look fine, and the past two have seemed okay, too. However, the First Advice/Reebok one makes pretty much anyone look like a scruffy bugger, and this shirt is in a similar vein, in my opinion.
My opinion is that your opinion is utter bollox !! who the fook are you to say what people should and shouldnt wear.
Read the first half-sentence again slowly. There's a good lad.
I bet the women who wear pyjamas in Tescos have a similar opinion to you, and you're all entitled to it.
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:It has been foretold that one day a thread on MCF.net will not cumulate in a discussion about DoomMerchant's gut.
DoomMerchant wrote:related, do you silly cunts really spell "pajamas" with a fuclin "y" in it?
jesus fucl sort it out please....
cheers
Chinners wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:related, do you silly cunts really spell "pajamas" with a fuclin "y" in it?
jesus fucl sort it out please....
cheers
Yes, because that is how it's spelt ... time for the head wobble thread for you I reckon
Alex Sapphire wrote:Chinners wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:related, do you silly cunts really spell "pajamas" with a fuclin "y" in it?
jesus fucl sort it out please....
cheers
Yes, because that is how it's spelt ... time for the head wobble thread for you I reckon
It's actually spelt پايجامه
But those yanks are lazy bastards who spell everything the way it sounds
Which is why we love them asking for Woucestershire sauce in their Bludy Mairees
irblinx wrote:I think we should start one of those international relief efforts to try and raise enough money to buy our North American cousins a massive pile of the letter U, it would hopefully bring the coloUr back to their cheeks
Dronny wrote:Got the new away shirt delivered earlier today and mighty fine it is. Compared to the same sized home shirt from two years ago its a little short which is a bit of a bugger but not enough to detract from it's allround brilliance. The new Mercer jacket is bloody good too.
Dingus McDouchey wrote:irblinx wrote:I think we should start one of those international relief efforts to try and raise enough money to buy our North American cousins a massive pile of the letter U, it would hopefully bring the coloUr back to their cheeks
Lol! But if you check the Latin origin, the "u" was never in those words to begin with. [highlight]Yanks have got it right on this one.[/highlight]
Alioune DVToure wrote:Dingus McDouchey wrote:irblinx wrote:I think we should start one of those international relief efforts to try and raise enough money to buy our North American cousins a massive pile of the letter U, it would hopefully bring the coloUr back to their cheeks
Lol! But if you check the Latin origin, the "u" was never in those words to begin with. [highlight]Yanks have got it right on this one.[/highlight]
Not quite. Most English words that derive from Latin do so via French, hence: color (Lat) - couleur (Fr) - culur - (Anglo-Norman) - colour (English).
The US English 'color' comes full circle, but more from a desire to phoneticise the language than through an etymological renaissance.
Alioune DVToure wrote:Dingus McDouchey wrote:irblinx wrote:I think we should start one of those international relief efforts to try and raise enough money to buy our North American cousins a massive pile of the letter U, it would hopefully bring the coloUr back to their cheeks
Lol! But if you check the Latin origin, the "u" was never in those words to begin with. [highlight]Yanks have got it right on this one.[/highlight]
Not quite. Most English words that derive from Latin do so via French, hence: color (Lat) - couleur (Fr) - culur - (Anglo-Norman) - colour (English).
The US English 'color' comes full circle, but more from a desire to phoneticise the language than through an etymological renaissance.
Wonderwall wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:Dingus McDouchey wrote:irblinx wrote:I think we should start one of those international relief efforts to try and raise enough money to buy our North American cousins a massive pile of the letter U, it would hopefully bring the coloUr back to their cheeks
Lol! But if you check the Latin origin, the "u" was never in those words to begin with. [highlight]Yanks have got it right on this one.[/highlight]
Not quite. Most English words that derive from Latin do so via French, hence: color (Lat) - couleur (Fr) - culur - (Anglo-Norman) - colour (English).
The US English 'color' comes full circle, but more from a desire to phoneticise the language than through an etymological renaissance.
I had to re-check the title of the thread after I read that!
Alioune DVToure wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:Dingus McDouchey wrote:irblinx wrote:I think we should start one of those international relief efforts to try and raise enough money to buy our North American cousins a massive pile of the letter U, it would hopefully bring the coloUr back to their cheeks
Lol! But if you check the Latin origin, the "u" was never in those words to begin with. [highlight]Yanks have got it right on this one.[/highlight]
Not quite. Most English words that derive from Latin do so via French, hence: color (Lat) - couleur (Fr) - culur - (Anglo-Norman) - colour (English).
The US English 'color' comes full circle, but more from a desire to phoneticise the language than through an etymological renaissance.
I had to re-check the title of the thread after I read that!
HAHA.
I'm desperately trying to think of a way to make myself seem interesting again after that.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: dick dastardley, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, trueblue64 and 193 guests