Ted Hughes wrote:Spurs is one of the hardest away games we'll play all season. if we win it then it really makes a big statement but if we get turned over, I don't think it says that much; any of the top 4 could get turned over there at any time if Spurs were at their best.
If we win a few/lose a few v the top 4 & batter everybody else, we will win the league. We've started well in that regard.
One thing is for sure though; last season's City team was not good enough to go toe to toe away at Spurs & beat them. Are we good enough now ? Let's see. I won't lose any sleep if we get beat. Just have a go & see what happens.
Ted Hughes wrote:Same as at Bolton but perhaps with different personnel, Clichy for his pace for example. Imo, if we play for & get a draw it's 1 point so if we attack & lose, we only lose 1 point. If we win, we gain 3. If we are trying to win the league, winning games is the way to go in most circumstances. We have the players. Lets give it a go. If we lose, we lose.
brite blu sky wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Same as at Bolton but perhaps with different personnel, Clichy for his pace for example. Imo, if we play for & get a draw it's 1 point so if we attack & lose, we only lose 1 point. If we win, we gain 3. If we are trying to win the league, winning games is the way to go in most circumstances. We have the players. Lets give it a go. If we lose, we lose.
Ok so no particular insight into how to play Spurs at WHL then? Play our own game and see where it gets us then. That's a bit dull but is a safe option.
Personally as long as we flood the midfield and look to cut out Spurs distribution at source from players like Huddlestone we will be pretty safe and frustrate them. As we often have a 5 man mid then suits fine as long as they push up and mix it up in a high line.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:brite blu sky wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Same as at Bolton but perhaps with different personnel, Clichy for his pace for example. Imo, if we play for & get a draw it's 1 point so if we attack & lose, we only lose 1 point. If we win, we gain 3. If we are trying to win the league, winning games is the way to go in most circumstances. We have the players. Lets give it a go. If we lose, we lose.
Ok so no particular insight into how to play Spurs at WHL then? Play our own game and see where it gets us then. That's a bit dull but is a safe option.
Personally as long as we flood the midfield and look to cut out Spurs distribution at source from players like Huddlestone we will be pretty safe and frustrate them. As we often have a 5 man mid then suits fine as long as they push up and mix it up in a high line.
The key to beating Spurs might come down to scoring more goals than them:)
But really I reckon it's all about stopping Bale and Lennon getting at us.
Ted Hughes wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:brite blu sky wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Same as at Bolton but perhaps with different personnel, Clichy for his pace for example. Imo, if we play for & get a draw it's 1 point so if we attack & lose, we only lose 1 point. If we win, we gain 3. If we are trying to win the league, winning games is the way to go in most circumstances. We have the players. Lets give it a go. If we lose, we lose.
Ok so no particular insight into how to play Spurs at WHL then? Play our own game and see where it gets us then. That's a bit dull but is a safe option.
Personally as long as we flood the midfield and look to cut out Spurs distribution at source from players like Huddlestone we will be pretty safe and frustrate them. As we often have a 5 man mid then suits fine as long as they push up and mix it up in a high line.
The key to beating Spurs might come down to scoring more goals than them:)
But really I reckon it's all about stopping Bale and Lennon getting at us.
Hence Cichy for Kolarov.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Google [Bot], Im_Spartacus, Scatman and 60 guests