Patrick wrote:Complete farce.
Imagine if they actually decide that it's a bum deal. Then what? We give the money back? They ban us from Europe? We give up the massive local regeneration project?
They are a bunch of bureaucratic idiots who made a set of rules without really thinking through the consequences
Welcome to the consequences.
Truth is you came up with this shit to protect the established football hierarchy when you saw what us upstarts at city were up to, well too late, drop yer pants bend over and stop bleating
Blue Since 76 wrote:For once, the rags have actually helped us - if you get get £10m sponsorship a season for a training kit that no one will ever see you wear and which you are banned from wearing in Europe, getting £40m a season for shirt, stadium, training ground and whle surrounding area sounds pretty cheap.
The scousers can keep it shut too - £20m a season for just shirts for a team not even in Europe. Yes, they have a lot of fans worldwide, but there's no reason why we can't claim similar, considering the additional exposure we'll have.
ENIAM NAM wrote:Blue Since 76 wrote:For once, the rags have actually helped us - if you get get £10m sponsorship a season for a training kit that no one will ever see you wear and which you are banned from wearing in Europe, getting £40m a season for shirt, stadium, training ground and whle surrounding area sounds pretty cheap.
The scousers can keep it shut too - £20m a season for just shirts for a team not even in Europe. Yes, they have a lot of fans worldwide, but there's no reason why we can't claim similar, considering the additional exposure we'll have.
We sell about 150k shirts a year and Liverpool sell close to million. Umbro pay us about 20% of what Liverpool get. Sounds about right.
We are still in the very early days of success. It takes years to build up a worldwide following. We will get there, but it will take time.
Agree about the utd training kit deal, all these inflated deals help us.
Blue Since 76 wrote:ENIAM NAM wrote:Blue Since 76 wrote:For once, the rags have actually helped us - if you get get £10m sponsorship a season for a training kit that no one will ever see you wear and which you are banned from wearing in Europe, getting £40m a season for shirt, stadium, training ground and whle surrounding area sounds pretty cheap.
The scousers can keep it shut too - £20m a season for just shirts for a team not even in Europe. Yes, they have a lot of fans worldwide, but there's no reason why we can't claim similar, considering the additional exposure we'll have.
We sell about 150k shirts a year and Liverpool sell close to million. Umbro pay us about 20% of what Liverpool get. Sounds about right.
We are still in the very early days of success. It takes years to build up a worldwide following. We will get there, but it will take time.
Agree about the utd training kit deal, all these inflated deals help us.
As I said, the scousers are popular worldwide, probably in the top bracket along with Real, Barca and one other. However, our profile over the last two years has grown enormously and will be further helped by the signing of players like Aguero (960k followers on twitter) and appearances in the CL. When we win it, everyone will know our name.
feedthegreek wrote:thought id bump this with a link looks like karl heinz as had a change of heart.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/14825620.stm
CityGer wrote:"I have some questions, yes," said Jean-Luc Dehaene, the chairman of Uefa's Club Financial Control Panel.
"If we see clubs that are looking for loopholes we will act," he said.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Google [Bot] and 139 guests