Crossie wrote:Heard about this, but I don't understand the details, do you still need to subscribe to sky? Or can you just use your current sky dish, plug in the Greek decoder, and hey presto, all the channels for no cost??
Crossie wrote:Heard about this, but I don't understand the details, do you still need to subscribe to sky? Or can you just use your current sky dish, plug in the Greek decoder, and hey presto, all the channels for no cost??
Patrick wrote:Crossie wrote:Heard about this, but I don't understand the details, do you still need to subscribe to sky? Or can you just use your current sky dish, plug in the Greek decoder, and hey presto, all the channels for no cost??
That's what I understand
You probably have to subscribe to the foreign channel though..... At least you would be saving the euro instead of supporting the evil Murdoch empire
mcfc1632 wrote:This and similar cases have been going on for a while -whilst it all sounds great there is a possible dire consequence for football in England
All(most) clubs get themselves into hock to get to the sacred land of the PL and then spend more to stay there - because of the riches that come from the Sky deal. Why have Sky chosen to pay so much? because of the monopoly they have had on the provision of the product in the UK and wider distribution rights.
Football has underpinned the Sky package to domestic customers - how will this change if UK people can get the sport from an alternative source - same for commercial customers (e.g. pubs) - Sky's revenues might plummet.
This may seem a good thing but what will be the knock-on implications to the deal they have with the PL when they come to renegotiate in a couple of years???
I reckon they could offer half the price and there would still be no credible competition. In turn what would be the knock-on implications to the clubs that have become so dependent on the revenue.
There are all sorts of scenarios - including some 'big' clubs deciding to break from the collective bargain - e.g. the scum
Things could unravel possibly quite dramatically
daveh1962 wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:This and similar cases have been going on for a while -whilst it all sounds great there is a possible dire consequence for football in England
All(most) clubs get themselves into hock to get to the sacred land of the PL and then spend more to stay there - because of the riches that come from the Sky deal. Why have Sky chosen to pay so much? because of the monopoly they have had on the provision of the product in the UK and wider distribution rights.
Football has underpinned the Sky package to domestic customers - how will this change if UK people can get the sport from an alternative source - same for commercial customers (e.g. pubs) - Sky's revenues might plummet.
This may seem a good thing but what will be the knock-on implications to the deal they have with the PL when they come to renegotiate in a couple of years???
I reckon they could offer half the price and there would still be no credible competition. In turn what would be the knock-on implications to the clubs that have become so dependent on the revenue.
There are all sorts of scenarios - including some 'big' clubs deciding to break from the collective bargain - e.g. the scum
Things could unravel possibly quite dramatically
The only people have REALLY benefited from Sky have been the players who have been paid huge wages because the clubs can due to Sky's income.
If the income from Sky is dramatically reduced then all that will happen is that the players salaries will be negotiated lower.
BlueinBosnia wrote:Final point in all of this- technically, the High Court could ignore the European Court's ruling, and side with Sky. After all, there's big money involved with this for the UK.
mcfc1632 wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:Final point in all of this- technically, the High Court could ignore the European Court's ruling, and side with Sky. After all, there's big money involved with this for the UK.
I agree that this is correct but I do not think that it will be the outcome in this case. The reason is that this is not a case of 'escalation' to the ECJ because a plaintiff was unhappy about a HC judgement - this was actually referred to the RCJ by the HC (I think) for guidance - which they have now received
BlueinBosnia wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:Final point in all of this- technically, the High Court could ignore the European Court's ruling, and side with Sky. After all, there's big money involved with this for the UK.
I agree that this is correct but I do not think that it will be the outcome in this case. The reason is that this is not a case of 'escalation' to the ECJ because a plaintiff was unhappy about a HC judgement - this was actually referred to the RCJ by the HC (I think) for guidance - which they have now received
You're right it was, but they're not obliged to follow the ECJ's ruling as far as I know.
everyonehatesus wrote:this can only be great news as sky will have to do something to their pricing now too.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: nottsblue, Scatman, stupot and 284 guests