Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Whether it had worked ( as I think it did) or not it was good to see a decisive move.
Simply put, but says it all!
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Whether it had worked ( as I think it did) or not it was good to see a decisive move.
ant london wrote:If we got a good offer at Xmas and had a higher quality replacement lined up I'd get rid of AJ at the drop of a hat.
Believes his own hype at the blink of an eye, drifts in and (more accurately) out of games with alarming frequency and just does not consistently offer enough.
Don't know who I'd replace him with but I honestly really do not rate him....he's not a kid and he's been here long enough to bed in and what he offers is not good enough
brite blu sky wrote:AJ aside I think one of the main things last night shows to us is that Mancini needs time to get to know more about the new players yet.
There was zero wrong with Bob's initial set up, AJ actually was doing ok.. no worse i would point out than other players with more responsibility. Mancini wasn't to know that Silva would be out of sorts or that Nige would also be off the pace. I would argue that these two factors are what did it for AJ. It was a fairly obvious move tbh to bring on someone to shore up the space in front of DeJong going forward and to help him defensively. That leads to Nasri.. and that's why i say Bob still needs time to get to know him. To be fair he did try in the first half to take up the slack from Silva but City are always looking for SIlva so there is another issue there. Two or three out of sorts key players left the rest mullered imo. Barry has his own gravity and was the perfect substitution in that situation, if that doesn't quell the doubters as to what Barry brings to the team nothing will.
If Nasri wasn't new and needed to be played to find his feet in the team basically, then i think he would have been the one pulled for Barry. It isn't so much the price tag thing, that is facile thinking tbh, it is the fact that new players have to be given time to suss out their role, they have to be played until they work through the adjustment period, dropping or subbing them is not a smart move for the longer term, so you have to just grin and bear it. Mancini has done that consistently with players brought in and it pays off.
Just a note too about Mancini being seen as a lucky manager... I wonder if that had anything to do with his substitutions creating that 'luck'. So far this season his subs have significantly changed games, won them, saved them or killed them off. Is that all coincidence?
simon12 wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:ant london wrote:If we got a good offer at Xmas and had a higher quality replacement lined up I'd get rid of AJ at the drop of a hat.
Believes his own hype at the blink of an eye, drifts in and (more accurately) out of games with alarming frequency and just does not consistently offer enough.
Don't know who I'd replace him with but I honestly really do not rate him....he's not a kid and he's been here long enough to bed in and what he offers is not good enough
Junior Hoilett. That is all
He will go for Di Maria at RM
Mike J wrote:2 goals in 3 games adam johnson is not good enough. hilarious. he's a top player!
Terry Cookes nose wrote:Firstly, it's pretty odd to sub someone in the 38th minute. Why not wait until half time.
But then again I understand mancini. It sends a signal to the entire squad, if you guys play like shit (like they did yesterday) all of you risk the fine chance of getting subbed at any minute of the game.
It shows who's in charge and what the man in charge expects performance wise.
Dameerto wrote:Terry Cookes nose wrote:Firstly, it's pretty odd to sub someone in the 38th minute. Why not wait until half time.
But then again I understand mancini. It sends a signal to the entire squad, if you guys play like shit (like they did yesterday) all of you risk the fine chance of getting subbed at any minute of the game.
It shows who's in charge and what the man in charge expects performance wise.
That's the only thing I could criticise Bob for, really. Firstly I think it was purely a tactical move, not motivated by AJ's performance in any way (backed up by him acknowledging AJ with a tap as he was going off). Making the sub towards the end of the first half gave the opposition chance to react over halftime and explain to the players what they should do to counter our change and they went from being swamped by us in the final minutes of the first half to being far more comfortable with our new formation in the second half.
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Dameerto wrote:Terry Cookes nose wrote:Firstly, it's pretty odd to sub someone in the 38th minute. Why not wait until half time.
But then again I understand mancini. It sends a signal to the entire squad, if you guys play like shit (like they did yesterday) all of you risk the fine chance of getting subbed at any minute of the game.
It shows who's in charge and what the man in charge expects performance wise.
That's the only thing I could criticise Bob for, really. Firstly I think it was purely a tactical move, not motivated by AJ's performance in any way (backed up by him acknowledging AJ with a tap as he was going off). Making the sub towards the end of the first half gave the opposition chance to react over halftime and explain to the players what they should do to counter our change and they went from being swamped by us in the final minutes of the first half to being far more comfortable with our new formation in the second half.
well we scored so it worked. Well done Bob. Showed decisiveness when we needed it.
brite blu sky wrote:AJ aside I think one of the main things last night shows to us is that Mancini needs time to get to know more about the new players yet.
There was zero wrong with Bob's initial set up, AJ actually was doing ok.. no worse i would point out than other players with more responsibility. Mancini wasn't to know that Silva would be out of sorts or that Nige would also be off the pace. I would argue that these two factors are what did it for AJ. It was a fairly obvious move tbh to bring on someone to shore up the space in front of DeJong going forward and to help him defensively. That leads to Nasri.. and that's why i say Bob still needs time to get to know him. To be fair he did try in the first half to take up the slack from Silva but City are always looking for SIlva so there is another issue there. Two or three out of sorts key players left the rest mullered imo. Barry has his own gravity and was the perfect substitution in that situation, if that doesn't quell the doubters as to what Barry brings to the team nothing will.
If Nasri wasn't new and needed to be played to find his feet in the team basically, then i think he would have been the one pulled for Barry. It isn't so much the price tag thing, that is facile thinking tbh, it is the fact that new players have to be given time to suss out their role, they have to be played until they work through the adjustment period, dropping or subbing them is not a smart move for the longer term, so you have to just grin and bear it. Mancini has done that consistently with players brought in and it pays off.
Just a note too about Mancini being seen as a lucky manager... I wonder if that had anything to do with his substitutions creating that 'luck'. So far this season his subs have significantly changed games, won them, saved them or killed them off. Is that all coincidence?
john@staustell wrote:When we saw Barry warmimg up on TV my missus said who will he bring off. Both me and my eldest said he will bring off AJ - back to his anonymous worst - and move Yaya forward.
This should be obvious to all City-watchers, although I can understand why it mystified the less-familiar pundits and commentators like Neville.
Yet some people in the ground seemed to be grumbling and mystified. How simple are these people? "Duh, defensive midfielder for brilliant winger, duh, does not compute." Whle AJ of course, having played himself into the team with a couple of excellent performances, played himself out again!
For the rest of the half Barry was 2 classes above anyone else on the field, we were back to playing with (nearly) 11 men and it led to the equaliser.
Well done Mancini.
Dameerto wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:well we scored so it worked. Well done Bob. Showed decisiveness when we needed it.
Of course it worked since it was the right thing to do, I was saying with hindsight we might have had a longer benefit if he'd waited another few minutes until halftime. It was a ballsy gamechanging decision to make and was good to see. Before that match he would have waited until the 60 minute mark to change things around.
Bluedj wrote:I think Nasri has great games when Cliche plays, they just complement each over on the left wing, when Koralov plays, there isn't that fluidity
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, blues-clues, Google [Bot], Indianablue, Mase, Scatman and 228 guests