Ted Hughes wrote:However good the results v QPR & Villareal, the 6-1 win was not just the best result of this season, but baring in mind the fact they'd won the previous 19 there : it's the best result in the history of the Premier League, anywhere.
You only have to look at how Sunderland were struggling to string 3 passes together without making an unforced error, against a rag side which was on it's knees terrified of making a mistake, or how many times experienced Chelsea players were incabale of making a sure contact on the ball when clean through on goal because they were at OT, to realise the 100 mile thick wall of psychological BULLSHIT City had to break through to win there in that manner. It was fucking monumental what those boys in blue did that day.
The Villareal result was crucial to putting us in the right frame of mind for the rags but that & the QPR results just helped prove we can be the real deal when things go wrong, as well as when they go right.
The rags hammering was history being made.
I'd agree with that 100% if it wasn't a derby. The fact that it was makes it just slightly less tour-de-force overcoming of that psychology. Derbies are different. If say we were Arsenal and we went and did that then I'd agree.
Don't get me wrong it was utterly fantastic, but we can batter the rags in a derby and then go and turn in a lead balloon v W.Brom the next week.
We said before the derby that it was more significant for them, more riding on it and more pressure on them. I still hold by that and by the same logic it actually proved nothing for City but severely relegated the rags from position of best team.
So I'm still convinced pulling out results when underperforming and when really needed edge it for me, although they won't be remembered for very long, whereas the derby win will be.