Mike J wrote:i had such high hopes for Lee Croft. what a shame.
Currently plying his trade for 500 quid a week at St Johnstone under Steve Lomas and Tommy Wright.
Mike J wrote:i had such high hopes for Lee Croft. what a shame.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Blue2 wrote:Blue in North London wrote:IMO the main reason why Croft didn't make it in the topflight was because he was unfit and he didn't have the technique/skills required. He was simply not good enough
As a 15 yeard od he was unbelieveably good and had everything to make it, but fitness was a key factor I think. Once he got in the 1st team he always seemed slow, overweight and not physically strong enough.
Absolutely about the fitness. And lack of real pace. I think I've never seen 20 year old as unfit.
If anything, I think he stopped working hard because he started believing his own hype. Hype we were all building.
john68 wrote:I saw Croft's development a slightly differently Mate.
I agree he was physically advanced and he did reach a level before his peers. After that though, he was left at the reserve level for a long time and was never given the challenges to push him on. I made a comment at the time that he had been playing against the same 16/17 years olds for too long. When he got his chance, his development had stagnated.
Not sure he would have made it, but too late when given the chance, the damage was done and his level already set.
Grob wrote:john68 wrote:I saw Croft's development a slightly differently Mate.
I agree he was physically advanced and he did reach a level before his peers. After that though, he was left at the reserve level for a long time and was never given the challenges to push him on. I made a comment at the time that he had been playing against the same 16/17 years olds for too long. When he got his chance, his development had stagnated.
Not sure he would have made it, but too late when given the chance, the damage was done and his level already set.
Maybe he was left down in the reserves for too long but in the cold light of day he wasnt any better than anything else we had at the time, we were just so rubbish in those days that we wanted a saviour and because he could beat a man every now and again, which was a novelty at the time, we thought he was the answer. I was one years back who hoped he could do something, same with BWP and Flood, but all 3 when they did get their chances were just not good enough. All 3 in the end got fair chances under Pearce.
At least we got Nedum, Ireland, and Richards through from that era.
2 players I did think deserved a chance under Keegen were Tyronne Mears and Stephen Elliott. Those were two players who I thought were better talents than Croft in terms of having the ability to play at the top level. They were never given a chance here then both had alot of injury trouble after they had prematurely moved on at the final part of their development which meant they never hit their potential.
Grob wrote:john68 wrote:I saw Croft's development a slightly differently Mate.
I agree he was physically advanced and he did reach a level before his peers. After that though, he was left at the reserve level for a long time and was never given the challenges to push him on. I made a comment at the time that he had been playing against the same 16/17 years olds for too long. When he got his chance, his development had stagnated.
Not sure he would have made it, but too late when given the chance, the damage was done and his level already set.
Maybe he was left down in the reserves for too long but in the cold light of day he wasnt any better than anything else we had at the time, we were just so rubbish in those days that we wanted a saviour and because he could beat a man every now and again, which was a novelty at the time, we thought he was the answer. I was one years back who hoped he could do something, same with BWP and Flood, but all 3 when they did get their chances were just not good enough. All 3 in the end got fair chances under Pearce.
At least we got Nedum, Ireland, and Richards through from that era.
2 players I did think deserved a chance under Keegen were Tyronne Mears and Stephen Elliott. Those were two players who I thought were better talents than Croft in terms of having the ability to play at the top level. They were never given a chance here then both had alot of injury trouble after they had prematurely moved on at the final part of their development which meant they never hit their potential.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Grob wrote:john68 wrote:I saw Croft's development a slightly differently Mate.
I agree he was physically advanced and he did reach a level before his peers. After that though, he was left at the reserve level for a long time and was never given the challenges to push him on. I made a comment at the time that he had been playing against the same 16/17 years olds for too long. When he got his chance, his development had stagnated.
Not sure he would have made it, but too late when given the chance, the damage was done and his level already set.
Maybe he was left down in the reserves for too long but in the cold light of day he wasnt any better than anything else we had at the time, we were just so rubbish in those days that we wanted a saviour and because he could beat a man every now and again, which was a novelty at the time, we thought he was the answer. I was one years back who hoped he could do something, same with BWP and Flood, but all 3 when they did get their chances were just not good enough. All 3 in the end got fair chances under Pearce.
At least we got Nedum, Ireland, and Richards through from that era.
2 players I did think deserved a chance under Keegen were Tyronne Mears and Stephen Elliott. Those were two players who I thought were better talents than Croft in terms of having the ability to play at the top level. They were never given a chance here then both had alot of injury trouble after they had prematurely moved on at the final part of their development which meant they never hit their potential.
To be fair, Elliott looked legit pretty good. I never quite understood why we sold him.
Mase wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Grob wrote:john68 wrote:I saw Croft's development a slightly differently Mate.
I agree he was physically advanced and he did reach a level before his peers. After that though, he was left at the reserve level for a long time and was never given the challenges to push him on. I made a comment at the time that he had been playing against the same 16/17 years olds for too long. When he got his chance, his development had stagnated.
Not sure he would have made it, but too late when given the chance, the damage was done and his level already set.
Maybe he was left down in the reserves for too long but in the cold light of day he wasnt any better than anything else we had at the time, we were just so rubbish in those days that we wanted a saviour and because he could beat a man every now and again, which was a novelty at the time, we thought he was the answer. I was one years back who hoped he could do something, same with BWP and Flood, but all 3 when they did get their chances were just not good enough. All 3 in the end got fair chances under Pearce.
At least we got Nedum, Ireland, and Richards through from that era.
2 players I did think deserved a chance under Keegen were Tyronne Mears and Stephen Elliott. Those were two players who I thought were better talents than Croft in terms of having the ability to play at the top level. They were never given a chance here then both had alot of injury trouble after they had prematurely moved on at the final part of their development which meant they never hit their potential.
To be fair, Elliott looked legit pretty good. I never quite understood why we sold him.
We didn't mate, he chose to leave and the fee was settled at a tribunal
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Mase wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Grob wrote:john68 wrote:I saw Croft's development a slightly differently Mate.
I agree he was physically advanced and he did reach a level before his peers. After that though, he was left at the reserve level for a long time and was never given the challenges to push him on. I made a comment at the time that he had been playing against the same 16/17 years olds for too long. When he got his chance, his development had stagnated.
Not sure he would have made it, but too late when given the chance, the damage was done and his level already set.
Maybe he was left down in the reserves for too long but in the cold light of day he wasnt any better than anything else we had at the time, we were just so rubbish in those days that we wanted a saviour and because he could beat a man every now and again, which was a novelty at the time, we thought he was the answer. I was one years back who hoped he could do something, same with BWP and Flood, but all 3 when they did get their chances were just not good enough. All 3 in the end got fair chances under Pearce.
At least we got Nedum, Ireland, and Richards through from that era.
2 players I did think deserved a chance under Keegen were Tyronne Mears and Stephen Elliott. Those were two players who I thought were better talents than Croft in terms of having the ability to play at the top level. They were never given a chance here then both had alot of injury trouble after they had prematurely moved on at the final part of their development which meant they never hit their potential.
To be fair, Elliott looked legit pretty good. I never quite understood why we sold him.
We didn't mate, he chose to leave and the fee was settled at a tribunal
Oh yeah, that was it.
Well fuck him then!
Yffi_88 wrote:St Johnstone is the only team in the Scottish AND English leagues to contain the letter 'J'.
So its not all doom and gloom for Crofty.
Beeks wrote:35 fucking goals this season now!!
Bianchi on Ice wrote:I know its easy to look back now and be mildly critical..but the players we had coming through were by and large frustratingly short of the quality needed. There always seemed to be a vital component missing..as if Cassell had been instructed to find a player with a specific attribute but no remit to provide anything else.
Kelvin Etuhu...pace, strength...but zero crossing ability
Ishmael Miller...pace...power...no composure
Ched Evans...physicality...willing...no pace
Willo Flood..willing..brave..lightweight
Lee Croft...skilful...no stamina
Stephen Jordan...decent composure...no pace...sluggish on the turn
Bradley Wright-Phillips...related to SWP...but not SWP
I dont mean to be flippant but thats as I saw it. Most have found their level.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Nick, Scatman and 209 guests