bigblue wrote:While Mario and Aguero may not link up great together, I think it comes back to the mystical "Plan B". If having the small front 4 isn't working, throw on Mario (like vs Everton at home) and have him create a goal from nothing. He certainly offers something different going forward than our other strikers. Like Aguero, Mario was devastating in the fall before their shot accuracy started to drop off. If he can get back to smashing shots on target from 35 yards, it's hard to see us not scoring a goal even when the main plan isn't going 100%
Socrates wrote:bigblue wrote:Everyone's being too harsh on Mario. He can be part of a winning team that has us demolish other teams (1-6 @ the swamp). Think he's got his head down and should do better now. He could learn from Aguero, who probably has one of the most professional attitudes in the whole league.
That has been my thinking too but I have to confess that those Aguero stats are a big blow to the theory. If our most effective striker is at his least effective when playing with Mario then that is a genuine reason to think we might be better with someone else. I know people are comparing Sturridge to Mario on the basis of selfishness, I don't think selfishness is the problem with Mario though, I think it is randomness. Aguero cannot guess what Mario will do next and it effects his game.
Ted Hughes wrote:It's a simple enough game when players up front actually make an effort to just knock the ball to each other. Some then hit it off like magic, others have to work on it but if you don't even try, it doesn't work.
None of our strikers, including Aguero, have made any effort to play together since early season. It's ok Gary Neville showing all this wonderful link up between Aguero & Tevez but Tevez is Aguero's Argentinian pal, who he passes to. It's not just about Tevez finding him, it's about him finding Tevez. Loads of time this season Aguero could have laid it on a plate for Dzeko or Balotelli but doesn't even notice them. They are more guilty than Aguero because they tend to just play for themselves most of the time, but Aguero is not blameless in this. Tevez has shown him how he could improve too.
john68 wrote:Socs,
Though I agree that what you say may play some part the in the statistically poor Aguero/Balotelli partnership, I think the bigger part of the problem is that Mario has no clue of the tactical importance of some of Aguero's movement. On Saturday, it was plain to see that Tevez not only understood what Aguero was attempting to accomplish but on many occasions was a step ahead in facilitating the space for Aguero by drawing players.
Mario has great feet, great skill and great ability. He does NOT have a great football brain. His randomness can be an asset, as we have seen when he has attempted some of his more outlandish moves. It is also proving to be detrimental to the team or the players round him.
Notwithstanding his attitude, we must remember that Mario is still a baby in football terms at this level, lacking the necessary maturity. Had Tevez been around, and the Tevez/Aguero partnership flourished, Mario would have been seen as a talented youngster, with huge potential but a lot to learn. He would have been vying with Dzeko to keep the bench warm, maybe playing the last minutes to see games out.
He has such great potential that he is worth keeping. If Tevez stays, the pressure on Mario will ease and he will have the chance to grow up and mature.
john68 wrote:Not sure if it is that he is not fast enough, or whether it is just part of the football culture he grew up with or a habit he has got into. But You are right Carl, when he goes looking for the foul, it annoys the fuck out of me too.
Not getting the foul simply means he has ridiculously given away possession and is on the floor should the ball run free again.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, john@staustell, Majestic-12 [Bot], nottsblue, PeterParker and 212 guests