zuricity wrote:I'm sure we can break even with a mind boggling Sponsorhip deal with Etihad again if necessary.
Socrates wrote:zuricity wrote:I'm sure we can break even with a mind boggling Sponsorhip deal with Etihad again if necessary.
Very unlikely that one mate. Any deal between the 2 will remain on a commercial basis and, if it wasn't, then that alone could be used as a reason to fail the audit as either a) it would be excluded as it came from a connected party or b) if it was money from Mansour, syphoned through Etihad, then it would amount to fraud!
Slim wrote:Socrates wrote:zuricity wrote:I'm sure we can break even with a mind boggling Sponsorhip deal with Etihad again if necessary.
Very unlikely that one mate. Any deal between the 2 will remain on a commercial basis and, if it wasn't, then that alone could be used as a reason to fail the audit as either a) it would be excluded as it came from a connected party or b) if it was money from Mansour, syphoned through Etihad, then it would amount to fraud!
If the connected party owned by the applicant has zero connection with football(other than the sponsorship) then they are excluded from being audited by FIFA.
Socrates wrote:Slim wrote:Socrates wrote:zuricity wrote:I'm sure we can break even with a mind boggling Sponsorhip deal with Etihad again if necessary.
Very unlikely that one mate. Any deal between the 2 will remain on a commercial basis and, if it wasn't, then that alone could be used as a reason to fail the audit as either a) it would be excluded as it came from a connected party or b) if it was money from Mansour, syphoned through Etihad, then it would amount to fraud!
If the connected party owned by the applicant has zero connection with football(other than the sponsorship) then they are excluded from being audited by FIFA.
Doesn't matter. UEFA can rule that the sponsorship is not on a commercial basis, unless evidence is provided to the contrary, and refuse MCFC's license.
ant london wrote:
love the jewish princess WAG today. I would slice her bagel any day
Chinners wrote:Spot on. Micah would be better concentrating his efforts on getting in the City side first.
Chinners wrote:[youtube]yn8IFmiL2yg[/youtube]
ant london wrote:Still can't believe how Paul Simpson gets to the ball before the keeper for that fourth goal......he starts from MILES away, cracking pace
Fish111 wrote:ant london wrote:Still can't believe how Paul Simpson gets to the ball before the keeper for that fourth goal......he starts from MILES away, cracking pace
Lol. I think it was because the keeper was stood still, it gave Simpson a distinct advantage in the race seeing as though he was running at pace. :-)
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: gmercer1, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Nick, trueblue64 and 164 guests