King Kev wrote:Now I know the rule is that the referee is supposed to decide if the game should stop when a player is injured but I was very disappointed with Swansea today.
In the first half Joe Hart was screaming at the ref to stop the game when a Swansea player was down in the area.
Unfortunately when Micah was rolling around in the area in obvious distress in the second half Swansea chose to ignore it and try to score.
It hardly seems fair to try and use an injury to a fellow professional to your advantage.
Swansea should be ashamed of themselves.
Nigels Tackle wrote:
ok to play on when one of your own (nasri) is down though?
ref not players should stop the game...
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Always leave it to the ref imo as there are too many cheats out there in all teams who would take advantage.
King Kev wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:
ok to play on when one of your own (nasri) is down though?
ref not players should stop the game...
I know the ref is supposed to decide if the game should be stopped, I meant to mention that in my post but must have forgot.
In what way is playing on whilst a member of your own team is injured unfair??
ashton287 wrote:I think the ref has to stop it if its a head injury but other than that if a player goes down off the ball then it's his own problem until the play comes to a stop of its own accord.
King Kev wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Always leave it to the ref imo as there are too many cheats out there in all teams who would take advantage.
So when the Swansea player went down and the ref doesn't see it Joe should just ignore it and play on?
What if he had a heart attack like Foe or Mwamba? Or swallowed his tongue like Paul Lake? Do we just ignore and try to score before referee notices?
Nigels Tackle wrote:
nasri goes down, we play on but instead of carlos scoring we lose possession and swansea go up the other end and score... is that fair?
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I remember a game vs West Ham a few years back. Julian Faubert was lying on the floor, we kicked it out and he jumped straight back up up. I disagree with putting the ball out. It should be the ref and ref only who decides. Too many cheats who take advantage.
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I remember a game vs West Ham a few years back. Julian Faubert was lying on the floor, we kicked it out and he jumped straight back up up. I disagree with putting the ball out. It should be the ref and ref only who decides. Too many cheats who take advantage.
Beefymcfc wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I remember a game vs West Ham a few years back. Julian Faubert was lying on the floor, we kicked it out and he jumped straight back up up. I disagree with putting the ball out. It should be the ref and ref only who decides. Too many cheats who take advantage.
In that case the referee should allow the biggest hardest player to twat him.
King Kev wrote:But what if the referee doesn't see the player lying prone on the ground, as happened yesterday?
Sometimes every second counts when it comes to getting treatment to the player.
Blue Since 76 wrote:King Kev wrote:But what if the referee doesn't see the player lying prone on the ground, as happened yesterday?
Sometimes every second counts when it comes to getting treatment to the player.
The reaction of other players is usually the give away. The linesman could perhaps help when the ref has his back to it. But when you had to kick the ball out it became ridiculous with players dropping all over the pitch.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: blues2win, city72, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 81 guests