Ted Hughes wrote:Cheers Doug.
We do seem to be just randomly throwing players into games at different levels atm. I don't mind that for a short while, but at some point we have to start putting the players into some kind of team environment, as they can't progress or learn pass & move football as part of a general shambles.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Cheers Doug.
We do seem to be just randomly throwing players into games at different levels atm. I don't mind that for a short while, but at some point we have to start putting the players into some kind of team environment, as they can't progress or learn pass & move football as part of a general shambles.
I am looking for something more positive tomorrow when we take on Chelsea again with the under 21's at Platt Lane.Most of the players who played water polo in Italy should be playing.I think it's those games and the NextGen series where we need to see more of a team.
Ted Hughes wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Cheers Doug.
We do seem to be just randomly throwing players into games at different levels atm. I don't mind that for a short while, but at some point we have to start putting the players into some kind of team environment, as they can't progress or learn pass & move football as part of a general shambles.
I am looking for something more positive tomorrow when we take on Chelsea again with the under 21's at Platt Lane.Most of the players who played water polo in Italy should be playing.I think it's those games and the NextGen series where we need to see more of a team.
I'm not really arsed about it from a results point of view, it's purely that there is a drop in overall standard if there isn't at least some kind of team unit, within which the players can express themselves.
the_georgian_genius wrote:how many players that are with the EDS are available for the under 18's? i.e how many could have played today. We seem to have a young team throughout the ages with many players playing years above their natural ages.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Cheers Doug.
We do seem to be just randomly throwing players into games at different levels atm. I don't mind that for a short while, but at some point we have to start putting the players into some kind of team environment, as they can't progress or learn pass & move football as part of a general shambles.
I am looking for something more positive tomorrow when we take on Chelsea again with the under 21's at Platt Lane.Most of the players who played water polo in Italy should be playing.I think it's those games and the NextGen series where we need to see more of a team.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:the_georgian_genius wrote:how many players that are with the EDS are available for the under 18's? i.e how many could have played today. We seem to have a young team throughout the ages with many players playing years above their natural ages.
Not too sure. Hiwula is injured at the moment (out for the season) so Devante Cole is in the EDS team plus there is Pozo, Lopes and Rekik. I think Suarez is over 18 now. Bar Rekik they are all attacking players.
There is also Ntcham who I think is 16 like Pozo but already playing EDS.
the_georgian_genius wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:the_georgian_genius wrote:how many players that are with the EDS are available for the under 18's? i.e how many could have played today. We seem to have a young team throughout the ages with many players playing years above their natural ages.
Not too sure. Hiwula is injured at the moment (out for the season) so Devante Cole is in the EDS team plus there is Pozo, Lopes and Rekik. I think Suarez is over 18 now. Bar Rekik they are all attacking players.
There is also Ntcham who I think is 16 like Pozo but already playing EDS.
decided to have a bit of a look and it does tell you something.
Shay Facey, Ellis Plummer, Greg Leigh, Karim Rekik, George Evans, George Glendon, Jules Ntcham, Jordi Hiwula, Devante Cole are all U18.
Marco Lopes, Mattias Boasserts, Jose Angel Pozo are all U17.
That's 12 players that are available for the Under 18's this season, that's basically a team. Would this be a youth cup team?
bobby brows wrote:Cheers for the report Doug. An ongoing u18s thread seems like a good idea.
The one thing I've noticed in all the next gen/u21s games is how less physical we seem to be compared to everyone else. Against Middlesbrough in August for example they looked like they fielded a team ready for the football league. We look ready for junior football bar one or two.
But then I've always felt we don't mature players on the physical side of the game
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The one coming along who is physical is Ntcham who is a bit of a beast for his age.But surely we want footballers and not big lumps coming through?
Tokyo Blue wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The one coming along who is physical is Ntcham who is a bit of a beast for his age.But surely we want footballers and not big lumps coming through?
This is an interesting one. On the whole, I agree with you - the football is the main focus - and physique a bonus. A Micah Richards or Yaya Toure-shaped bonus.
I watched about an hour of the Juventus game and thought Ntcham did very well. Other other hand it is only one game.
I am really interested in this thread, the info and the views expressed. I hope the contributors can continue to update throughout the season if at all possible.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:bobby brows wrote:Cheers for the report Doug. An ongoing u18s thread seems like a good idea.
The one thing I've noticed in all the next gen/u21s games is how less physical we seem to be compared to everyone else. Against Middlesbrough in August for example they looked like they fielded a team ready for the football league. We look ready for junior football bar one or two.
But then I've always felt we don't mature players on the physical side of the game
Our EDS side fielded a back 4 on Wednesday which was 4 centre backs and I would say they are all quite physical. Kennedy,Plummer,Rekik and Walters.The problem I see with them is I think they lack pace.Certainly Kennedy and Walters are slow compared to top level football.Plummer and Rekik I am not as sure about.
But in midfield I would agree that Evans( although he isnt afraid of putting his foot in) Suarez,Lopes,Rusnak,Drury are not physical players.The one coming along who is physical is Ntcham who is a bit of a beast for his age.But surely we want footballers and not big lumps coming through?
bobby brows wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:bobby brows wrote:Cheers for the report Doug. An ongoing u18s thread seems like a good idea.
The one thing I've noticed in all the next gen/u21s games is how less physical we seem to be compared to everyone else. Against Middlesbrough in August for example they looked like they fielded a team ready for the football league. We look ready for junior football bar one or two.
But then I've always felt we don't mature players on the physical side of the game
Our EDS side fielded a back 4 on Wednesday which was 4 centre backs and I would say they are all quite physical. Kennedy,Plummer,Rekik and Walters.The problem I see with them is I think they lack pace.Certainly Kennedy and Walters are slow compared to top level football.Plummer and Rekik I am not as sure about.
But in midfield I would agree that Evans( although he isnt afraid of putting his foot in) Suarez,Lopes,Rusnak,Drury are not physical players.The one coming along who is physical is Ntcham who is a bit of a beast for his age.But surely we want footballers and not big lumps coming through?
I've seen Kieran Kennedy a few times this year. He should get used to the dimensions of ewen fields as he'll be playing at that level.
I agree there is a difference between size and just beIng big but I think about Ronaldo when arrived at the filth he was quick but small. They got him in the gym and bulked him. Birmingham did the same with joe hart. It's a physical game and it's important to have strengh on the ball.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 84 guests