Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I have to say I've been very impressed with how Spartacus has articulated on this subject.
Now who's playing mind games.....:-)
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I have to say I've been very impressed with how Spartacus has articulated on this subject.
john68 wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I have to say I've been very impressed with how Spartacus has articulated on this subject.
Now who's playing mind games.....:-)
Chinners wrote:Maureen can feck off as far as I'm concerned ... we'll be looking for another manager again after two seasons so whats the point
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:That's the $64 million question.
But as I can't see the direction we're meant to be going in under Mancini, I think it is less of a risk.
So much depends on the FA Cup, win that and once again it is hard to dismiss him. But is that enough when we presumably want bigger things?
Ted Hughes wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:That's the $64 million question.
But as I can't see the direction we're meant to be going in under Mancini, I think it is less of a risk.
So much depends on the FA Cup, win that and once again it is hard to dismiss him. But is that enough when we presumably want bigger things?
I don't actually give a flying toss about the FA Cup when it comes to judging the manager. I would love to win it of course, but with this squad I would expect any old manager to win the FA Cup here & there, so I won't judge Mancini either way on that.
Winning the title however was a huge achievement & I'm not sure that many managers could have done it so quickly. Therefore, I'm not convinced that many managers would be a consistent improvement on Bob, although for this season, I think Mel fucking Machin wold have been an improvement, as Bob has been utterly useless 90% of the time.
I would back Bob to get his shit together & deliver next season more than I would back most of his potential replacements though.
I have to add though that if Mourinho took over, I think we would get at least equal or better results, especially in Europe.
I have no football reason for not wanting Mourinho, he is a proven better manager than Bob so far.
I just don't want that circus of petty squabbling bullshit at our place, end of.
Lee_R wrote:Have to admit even though I started this thread.. Mourinhos stats this season are worse than Mancinis in the league. Considering R Madrid are by far the 2nd best team in the spanish league and the big divide, its quite shocking.
(league only)
Mancini
P 26
W 15
D 8
L 3
F 48
A 24
Mourinho
P 23
W 14
D 4
L 5
F 58
A 22
Kind of tells me that if it wasnt for Ronaldo, as a team they'd not be doing too well.
john68 wrote:
I ask a specific question, and you dodge the question again....and again...and again.
There are many weaknesses to your argument but this perhaps is the biggest. "Maybe, somewhere, in the whole of football, there may be."....Is that it? Maybe...possibly...somewhere.
Quite obviously beyond demolition and destruction, you haven't thought this through.
Honestly Roger, you don't want a debate, you just want a moan.
lots of love
Not impressed
Middleton
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
And we havent had any squabbling at our gaff ? the Tevez affair wasnt a circus? the weekly Ballo drivel wasnt a Circus?
I think when all is said and done we have had enough goings on at City with Mancini in charge to match Billy smarts fuckign circus mate.
Ive said it before , Mourinho would not be a gamble , anybody else would be.
zuricity wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
And we havent had any squabbling at our gaff ? the Tevez affair wasnt a circus? the weekly Ballo drivel wasnt a Circus?
I think when all is said and done we have had enough goings on at City with Mancini in charge to match Billy smarts fuckign circus mate.
Ive said it before , Mourinho would not be a gamble , anybody else would be.
Sorry Carl , don't often disagree , but Jose would be a very big gamble. Very big. I think he's a spent force. Furthermore i don't and never have wanted him anywhere near City.
Let him go to the swamp whilst we watch the demise of the Rags.
Lee_R wrote:Have to admit even though I started this thread.. Mourinhos stats this season are worse than Mancinis in the league. Considering R Madrid are by far the 2nd best team in the spanish league and the big divide, its quite shocking.
(league only)
Mancini
P 26
W 15
D 8
L 3
F 48
A 24
Mourinho
P 23
W 14
D 4
L 5
F 58
A 22
Kind of tells me that if it wasnt for Ronaldo, as a team they'd not be doing too well.
Beefymcfc wrote:In all seriousness, it's a wierd one with JM this season. So far off the pace that even Atletico are above them. We think we've got a good squad of players but he's got a fantastic group there that should be beating the likes of Granada and certainly not drawing with the then bottom team of Espanyol. What's more mystifying is that he is the arm round the shoulder manager that every club he's at, love. When you have fall-outs with strong characters and the crowd are booing you before, during and after games then you know something is seriously wrong.
JM is currently one of the greats in the game and for things to go so wrong, so quickly, then it makes you wonder if he can pull it back.
On another note, I'd love Real to beat the Rags tomorrow in similar way to how they beat us; a fuck up at the back in the dying minutes.
Beefymcfc wrote:In all seriousness, it's a wierd one with JM this season. So far off the pace that even Atletico are above them. We think we've got a good squad of players but he's got a fantastic group there that should be beating the likes of Granada and certainly not drawing with the then bottom team of Espanyol. What's more mystifying is that he is the arm round the shoulder manager that every club he's at, love. When you have fall-outs with strong characters and the crowd are booing you before, during and after games then you know something is seriously wrong.
JM is currently one of the greats in the game and for things to go so wrong, so quickly, then it makes you wonder if he can pull it back.
On another note, I'd love Real to beat the Rags tomorrow in similar way to how they beat us; a fuck up at the back in the dying minutes.
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:john68 wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I have to say I've been very impressed with how Spartacus has articulated on this subject.
Now who's playing mind games.....:-)
No John, he has been very wise.
Plus....... you would need a mind for me to play games with.
Ted Hughes wrote:zuricity wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
And we havent had any squabbling at our gaff ? the Tevez affair wasnt a circus? the weekly Ballo drivel wasnt a Circus?
I think when all is said and done we have had enough goings on at City with Mancini in charge to match Billy smarts fuckign circus mate.
Ive said it before , Mourinho would not be a gamble , anybody else would be.
Sorry Carl , don't often disagree , but Jose would be a very big gamble. Very big. I think he's a spent force. Furthermore i don't and never have wanted him anywhere near City.
Let him go to the swamp whilst we watch the demise of the Rags.
We have had our share of embarrassing incidents & Bob can be a bit of a turd at times, but the stuff which happens around Mourinho has a raglike kind of evil nastiness about it which we don't.
He will continue to win stuff though. I made the mistake of calling him a spent force & overrated, on here when he went to Inter & he improved Bob's team hugely & again won the Champions League with a side nowhere near the best in the competition, thus forcing me to eat my words. Then he twatted the invincible Barca team.
The bloke is having a bad season but he is fucking good at his job, & is having to play a lot more open & cavallier as Real's manager than he would if it was upto him.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, gmercer1, rosbif cuisson 'bleu' and 211 guests