carl_feedthegoat wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:City were good today. The front 3 played with a lot more awareness of each other than we have seen in many games & Yaya put a lot more in.
Hope it was injury which kept Sinclair out of the squad as otherwise it's quite a mean snub imo.
I see you made zero reference to Nastys game !! and dont come out with that old chestnut "leeds were shite" as you can only play whats in front of you,just about every time Nasty plays we keep a clean sheet...coincidence???
BTW Nasty aslo plays great FOOTBALL instead of the fuckign sideways ,backwards,just hoof it upfield to noone Lescott.
What the fuck did he do ?!!
He was neat & tidy & not quite as good as Kolo Toure if you want a comment.
Gave the ball away quite a few times did one or two good things but one or two bad things as well. And yes it was only Leeds who weren't really a threat from start to finish.
Crock of shite..go to the back of the class with Ted.
Just added this to my earlier post:
From the OS: City v Southampton, 1-3. Lescott completed passes: 21 from 25. City v Leeds 4-0 Nastasic completed passes: 25 from 32.
UInder no pressure, in perfect conditions, against a lower league side, his distribution was much worse than Lescott's v a side who was chasing everything, on a wet pitch, away from home. That's stats from our own website.
Once again, you are watching the game in your head, rather than the one which actually happened.