dazby wrote:Originally posted in Ask the Lads by rosbif cuisson 'bleu'
I've noticed recently that when Bale places the ball for free kicks he spends time rotating the ball before placing it on the ground.
I'm guessing he's looking for the valve (if balls still have them...i know that since my day laces have gone...). I reckon it was so he can find the section of the ball that is ever so slightly 'harder' in order to improve the contact when he strikes it.
Does anyone who plays ( or not ) know if this is what's going on or if he's just 'getting in the zone'. He does seem to have found a way to get that fast dip on his free kicks. Tranny used to have a way of striking a free kick that produced a similar flight , but i never saw him looking so closely at the ball.
dazby wrote:The fact that the balls are so light means that they an swerve so much when kicked with topspin. I'm going to be coaching some players next week on how to do these kicks. Normally, when taking a goal kick it's like a golf shot. Hit the ball low and then allow the studs to go through the grass and sometimes take a divot. With these kicks (note Tranny's winner against us in the first Chumps league game) you place the ball a little more forward in your stance and actually take your divot before you make contact with the ball. This causes topspin on the ball and gives it a much more unpredictable flight path making it much harder to defend.
Note Tevez goal on the weekend. He hits the ground before the ball causing the ball to fly with no backspin. As a result, it goes through the air much faster. Had he of hit it conventionally it wouldn't have generated the same speed and should have been saved.
blues-clues wrote:Cricket balls usually swing because one side is rougher, dirtier or has been tampered with. Perhaps Bale is looking for damage, dirt or marks on the ball that might change its aerodynamics slightly; maybe he has something in his hair that he is applying to the ball before he kicks it that has the same result?? Would that be outlawed under current rules -it is in cricket!
london blue 2 wrote:The technique needed is more of a jab punch than a follow through. Hard to explain.
Ted Hughes wrote:dazby wrote:The fact that the balls are so light means that they an swerve so much when kicked with topspin. I'm going to be coaching some players next week on how to do these kicks. Normally, when taking a goal kick it's like a golf shot. Hit the ball low and then allow the studs to go through the grass and sometimes take a divot. With these kicks (note Tranny's winner against us in the first Chumps league game) you place the ball a little more forward in your stance and actually take your divot before you make contact with the ball. This causes topspin on the ball and gives it a much more unpredictable flight path making it much harder to defend.
Note Tevez goal on the weekend. He hits the ground before the ball causing the ball to fly with no backspin. As a result, it goes through the air much faster. Had he of hit it conventionally it wouldn't have generated the same speed and should have been saved.
Dazby: When Jimmy Anderson for instance releases a cricket ball it barely rotates, just swings, but on occasion if it makes a half turn, the air flow changes & it starts to go the other way.
Some swing bowlers can still swing it if it rotates provided the seam stays straight of course but I think the majority of top exponents don't have much rotation or at least very slow rotation.
To do that with a football, you must be making contact somewhere close to the centre.
Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:dazby wrote:The fact that the balls are so light means that they an swerve so much when kicked with topspin. I'm going to be coaching some players next week on how to do these kicks. Normally, when taking a goal kick it's like a golf shot. Hit the ball low and then allow the studs to go through the grass and sometimes take a divot. With these kicks (note Tranny's winner against us in the first Chumps league game) you place the ball a little more forward in your stance and actually take your divot before you make contact with the ball. This causes topspin on the ball and gives it a much more unpredictable flight path making it much harder to defend.
Note Tevez goal on the weekend. He hits the ground before the ball causing the ball to fly with no backspin. As a result, it goes through the air much faster. Had he of hit it conventionally it wouldn't have generated the same speed and should have been saved.
Dazby: When Jimmy Anderson for instance releases a cricket ball it barely rotates, just swings, but on occasion if it makes a half turn, the air flow changes & it starts to go the other way.
Some swing bowlers can still swing it if it rotates provided the seam stays straight of course but I think the majority of top exponents don't have much rotation or at least very slow rotation.
To do that with a football, you must be making contact somewhere close to the centre.
wasting your time asking an Ozzie to comment on Anderson's bowling. It's clearly a mystery to them all
Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:dazby wrote:The fact that the balls are so light means that they an swerve so much when kicked with topspin. I'm going to be coaching some players next week on how to do these kicks. Normally, when taking a goal kick it's like a golf shot. Hit the ball low and then allow the studs to go through the grass and sometimes take a divot. With these kicks (note Tranny's winner against us in the first Chumps league game) you place the ball a little more forward in your stance and actually take your divot before you make contact with the ball. This causes topspin on the ball and gives it a much more unpredictable flight path making it much harder to defend.
Note Tevez goal on the weekend. He hits the ground before the ball causing the ball to fly with no backspin. As a result, it goes through the air much faster. Had he of hit it conventionally it wouldn't have generated the same speed and should have been saved.
Dazby: When Jimmy Anderson for instance releases a cricket ball it barely rotates, just swings, but on occasion if it makes a half turn, the air flow changes & it starts to go the other way.
Some swing bowlers can still swing it if it rotates provided the seam stays straight of course but I think the majority of top exponents don't have much rotation or at least very slow rotation.
To do that with a football, you must be making contact somewhere close to the centre.
wasting your time asking an Ozzie to comment on Anderson's bowling. It's clearly a mystery to them all
Ted Hughes wrote:london blue 2 wrote:The technique needed is more of a jab punch than a follow through. Hard to explain.
With a football imo the simplest description is: toe ender.
london blue 2 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:london blue 2 wrote:The technique needed is more of a jab punch than a follow through. Hard to explain.
With a football imo the simplest description is: toe ender.
It's definately not toe ending, its about using power to strike the ball but the technique requires you to (the only word I can think is) punch the ball with very little or no follow through.
london blue 2 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:london blue 2 wrote:The technique needed is more of a jab punch than a follow through. Hard to explain.
With a football imo the simplest description is: toe ender.
It's definately not toe ending, its about using power to strike the ball but the technique requires you to (the only word I can think is) punch the ball with very little or no follow through.
it can be done using spin (not so successfully), as following through a strike can also keep the ball from rotating at times (see Elano).
Best way I can explain is when you hit a shot/volley without using all your power but the ball flies like a mofo.
Its all in the technique and anyone whos played footy regularly has probably experienced it before. The guys that can do it regularly are the guys that can take these freekicks.
Hazy2 wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:london blue 2 wrote:The technique needed is more of a jab punch than a follow through. Hard to explain.
With a football imo the simplest description is: toe ender.
It's definately not toe ending, its about using power to strike the ball but the technique requires you to (the only word I can think is) punch the ball with very little or no follow through.
it can be done using spin (not so successfully), as following through a strike can also keep the ball from rotating at times (see Elano).
Best way I can explain is when you hit a shot/volley without using all your power but the ball flies like a mofo.
Its all in the technique and anyone whos played footy regularly has probably experienced it before. The guys that can do it regularly are the guys that can take these freekicks.
The Saints LB Shaw top young player is doing it from open play with crosses, one touch to set it up and nightmare cross for defenders and keepers to deal with, as you say some have it others no chance. Bale is a class act working on his game daily.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carolina-blue, Google [Bot], Mase, nottsblue, Scatman, stupot and 102 guests