City64 wrote:If it wasnt for Guzan,s fingertips it would have been a cosy 3 nil jobbie .
Still , a "few" on here would still be moaning like fuck !
carl_feedthegoat wrote:I think I will stick with the "it was a pile of fuckign shite" angle and moan about it for a few days more.
Spurge wrote:MilnersJaw wrote:bluejon wrote:Christ villa are shite are they in the last chance!
Love how my last chance has caught on.
But seriously how many chances will nasri get, when will one more poor performance be enough for the saloon?
To be fair he did ok got involved straight away and linked up play ok
kjchronic wrote:Missed the game, managed to not see the score, so decided to read through this thread to see how it went... we must've been crap as when I was reading the Tevez goal I thought that was us making it 1-1, especially considering all the mentions of 'dire' first 25 mins, I wasn't even sure on the result until I read 3 points at the end.
Experiencing a game that way was a first for me, not easy reading but at least I got a gist of the flow of the match lol
aaron bond wrote:I disagree with a lot of the comments here. It was by no means our finest performance, but it was a solid performance and we restricted Villa to few chances. Villa are fighting for their lives and they made it very difficult for us at times, but we held firm.
We created plenty of good chances and Guzan made some great saves, particularly the 2 he tipped onto the post.
Silva was disappointing by his own standards, and it was a great shame to lose Rodwell to injury again. He really looks like a good player but I'm not sure if he'll ever be able to shrug off these injuries. I really hope he can.
Another excellent performance by Kolo - he really has come into the side and performed well. And (as usual) Milner played well. I thought Tevez worked hard and didn't think he deserved to be taken off (Mancini showing him who's boss again!), and he took his goal very well.
Nasri did ok when he came on but I really just want him gone in the summer. I wish Sinclair would get these cameos instead of Nasri.
All in all, a hard-fought 3 points and that's 3 wins on the trot now. We have some key games coming up so it's good to have a bit of momentum.
Goaters 103 wrote:Patchy performance but we will take the points thank you.
Win our 5 remianing games at home, all very winnable, and that puts us on a minimum 74 points which Arse and Chelsea wont reach, meaning an automatic CL spot is clinched.
Kolo excellent, Tevez did the job when required. We still painfully lack pace and width in the final third, and as usually struggled away from home to break a bum team down, but Villa decided to gift us a goal, so thanks very much for that.
Press take on that type of City win - "Unconvincing from City, struggled at times." Press take when United sneak that sort of game - "Thats what good teams do, grind out results when they arent at their best."
Song of the night - "Gareth Barry thinks you're shit, thinks you're shit, thinks you're shit, Gareth Barry thinks you're shit, so does Milner"
Cocacolajojo wrote:Goaters 103 wrote:Patchy performance but we will take the points thank you.
Win our 5 remianing games at home, all very winnable, and that puts us on a minimum 74 points which Arse and Chelsea wont reach, meaning an automatic CL spot is clinched.
Kolo excellent, Tevez did the job when required. We still painfully lack pace and width in the final third, and as usually struggled away from home to break a bum team down, but Villa decided to gift us a goal, so thanks very much for that.
Press take on that type of City win - "Unconvincing from City, struggled at times." Press take when United sneak that sort of game - "Thats what good teams do, grind out results when they arent at their best."
Song of the night - "Gareth Barry thinks you're shit, thinks you're shit, thinks you're shit, Gareth Barry thinks you're shit, so does Milner"
Great song. I don't understand why they STILL bother to bo Barry. Did he say something bad about them or what? What happened when he went to us?
Socrates wrote:kjchronic wrote:Missed the game, managed to not see the score, so decided to read through this thread to see how it went... we must've been crap as when I was reading the Tevez goal I thought that was us making it 1-1, especially considering all the mentions of 'dire' first 25 mins, I wasn't even sure on the result until I read 3 points at the end.
Experiencing a game that way was a first for me, not easy reading but at least I got a gist of the flow of the match lol
Years of experience has taught me to largely steer clear of these threads. Negative moaning minnies completely dominate them and I just end up wanting to shove someone's left leg up their arse. (Yes it is often you Carl but not always) As an anti-violence person that feeling doesn't do anything for me. So best advice: never judge the team by the match threads...
patrickblue wrote:Sorry to resurrect this thread, but I 'm a bit puzzled why no-one remarked on Dzeko,s disallowed goal. As far as I've always seen it, to be offside a player needs to be nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second last opponent (generally the last defender as the keeper's usually the second). Seeing it came back to him off the post, on that definition he would be onside. I'm sure someone with some reffing experience can give a reason why that's not the case, and I'm just interpreting in the way I read the rules. What I'm surprised about is that it's not been mentioned. I'm only posting this now as I've just got back from New Orleans, where I watched the game in a bar, so there wasn't going to be any sort of discussion there, seeing all they ever do is watch basketball, in fact my missus who was pissed as a fart is an expert in comparison.
Any views?
zuricity wrote:patrickblue wrote:Sorry to resurrect this thread, but I 'm a bit puzzled why no-one remarked on Dzeko,s disallowed goal. As far as I've always seen it, to be offside a player needs to be nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second last opponent (generally the last defender as the keeper's usually the second). Seeing it came back to him off the post, on that definition he would be onside. I'm sure someone with some reffing experience can give a reason why that's not the case, and I'm just interpreting in the way I read the rules. What I'm surprised about is that it's not been mentioned. I'm only posting this now as I've just got back from New Orleans, where I watched the game in a bar, so there wasn't going to be any sort of discussion there, seeing all they ever do is watch basketball, in fact my missus who was pissed as a fart is an expert in comparison.
Any views?
I think it goes like this. At the time the shot came in, Edin was in an offside position. Old world rules , linesman would flag. Modern rules he is passive offside. The ball did not get played back to him by any another player. At which time he received it, there had been player movement and he looked on side. Since no other player touched the ball, his passive becomes active and he is offside.
patrickblue wrote:
See where you're going, I would certainly agree with old world rules. and that would have been that. It's the fact that it came back to him not forward makes me look at it the other way, He was still a mile O/S when it came back to him.
Still, not really arguing the point, just really surprised no-one else did at the time.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Pretty Boy Lee, Scatman, stupot and 109 guests