Pick the manager.

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Blue Since 76 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:14 am

City64 wrote:
Laudrup and Martinez are both quality young premier league managers but would either be able to manage superstar players with huge ego,s earning huge money at a huge club ?



I think Martinez needs to take a step up before moving to a top 4 side. Laudrup however had a previous record if winning things. He was also a player others would look up to for what he achieved in the game, so I think he'd have less issue with the egos.

Not saying I'd take him, but if it had to be a choice of one of the other 18 managers in the PL, it'd be him or AVB. AVB was given a rough time at Chelsea and the press were on his back when he took over at Spurs, due to his time at Chelsea but mainly due to him replacing St 'Arry. A bit like Mancini was when he first came in. Think he's done pretty well so far and if Levy actually spends some money in summer, they could be a real threat next season.
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:27 am

Blue Since 76 wrote:
City64 wrote:
Laudrup and Martinez are both quality young premier league managers but would either be able to manage superstar players with huge ego,s earning huge money at a huge club ?



I think Martinez needs to take a step up before moving to a top 4 side. Laudrup however had a previous record if winning things. He was also a player others would look up to for what he achieved in the game, so I think he'd have less issue with the egos.

Not saying I'd take him, but if it had to be a choice of one of the other 18 managers in the PL, it'd be him or AVB. AVB was given a rough time at Chelsea and the press were on his back when he took over at Spurs, due to his time at Chelsea but mainly due to him replacing St 'Arry. A bit like Mancini was when he first came in. Think he's done pretty well so far and if Levy actually spends some money in summer, they could be a real threat next season.


Spurs are the PL biggest spenders this season as far as I know.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby MilnersJaw » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:25 pm

Levy is a tight arse though
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Blue Since 76 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:03 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Spurs are the PL biggest spenders this season as far as I know.


According to transfermarkt.co.uk, they spent £65m this season (summer & January) which is more than I remembered. However, they also sold £47m, so only spent a net £17m.

Other net spends for comparison:
Chelsea £78m
Rags £54m
Liverpool £50m
Villa £22m!
Us £15m
Newcastle £15m
Arsenal £3.5m profit

Levy is a very shrewd operator and doesn't spend big. If he did, who knows what they could achieve.

Nice to see that the rags haven't bought the league, though. And for any Arsenal fans wondering why they're struggling...
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby john68 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:50 pm

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:
john68 wrote:
YOU FINALLY DID IT...You convinced me Mate....How could we possibly compare the "LOTS IN FACT" that Laudrup has won against the might of Danish Football...(1 League Title and 3 Cup wins), As well as our underestimated League Cup, against the paucity of success and much over estimated record of Mancini...(3 Serie A Titles, 3 Coppa Italias, 1 Supercoppa, 1 FA Cup, 1 Premier league title and a Community Shield).

Viva La Revolution...Mancini out! Tomorrow we march on the Etihad...Laudrup IN!!!!!
PS...Just so I am clear, when we get Laudrup in, who do we want as his replacement the following week? I think it's always best to plan ahead....:-)
PPS...Can I make it clear before the revolution starts that the waving of red flags is a defo no go for me...:-)


Mr 68. How very trite. When he went to Brondby they were at a low ebb and he revived the club. It is not unfair to say that he has massively over achieved at Brondby, Getafe and Swansea. And he has done it all with teams playing with panache and style. Wouldn't that be lovely at our club? And it seems he is good enough for Madrid but not Manchester City supporters. Mark my words he is in line for a big job now, but you know best.


Roger, I never doubted the talents of Mr Laudrup for one moment mate. I was just amused by the irony of "Laudrup's won all this, get him in being compared to Mancini's record...get him out."

You could well be right Roger but telling me that the guy who wandered up Snowdon should replace a bloke who climbed the Eiger ain't the best argument to prove your case....:-)

...and I still won't do red flags....not even for you Pal...:-)
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:30 pm

john68 wrote:
Roger, I never doubted the talents of Mr Laudrup for one moment mate. I was just amused by the irony of "Laudrup's won all this, get him in being compared to Mancini's record...get him out."

You could well be right Roger but telling me that the guy who wandered up Snowdon should replace a bloke who climbed the Eiger ain't the best argument to prove your case....:-)

...and I still won't do red flags....not even for you Pal...:-)


Oh come on now John. I wasn't suggesting that his trophy haul was as large as Bob's. I was merely pointing out that to suggest he had only won the Carling Cup is nonsense. Managers need an opportunity at a club with a realistic chance before they can amass these impressive honours. It therefore doesn't follow that to be a great manager, you need to have a bulging sack (of trophies)
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby john68 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:45 pm

Agreed Mate.....but even you must smile at the weakness of that reasoning.

We should take the risk and gamble on a guy who might be good if given the resources, based on what he did in a very poor league in Denmark?

Are City really at that stage of evolving our project?
...and quite seriously, how long would you give him if he fails to come up with the goods?

I have said previously, you may well be right but not one single reason you have put forward is convincing...yet!!!!
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby zuricity » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:15 pm

john68 wrote:Agreed Mate.....but even you must smile at the weakness of that reasoning.

We should take the risk and gamble on a guy who might be good if given the resources, based on what he did in a very poor league in Denmark?

Are City really at that stage of evolving our project?
...and quite seriously, how long would you give him if he fails to come up with the goods?

I have said previously, you may well be right but not one single reason you have put forward is convincing...yet!!!!


John, i think Laudrup has the makings of a great manager, not just because of what he won as a player and coach so far , like many from
Norway, Sweden, Denmark, he masters the English language .

However , i do not think he will be at City , because i can't see our owner dumping Bob. He has no reason to, even if we only finish second this season. There is something simply not right about the Rags success this season, they really are an average team.
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18411
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:03 pm

john68 wrote:Agreed Mate.....but even you must smile at the weakness of that reasoning.

We should take the risk and gamble on a guy who might be good if given the resources, based on what he did in a very poor league in Denmark?

Are City really at that stage of evolving our project?
...and quite seriously, how long would you give him if he fails to come up with the goods?

I have said previously, you may well be right but not one single reason you have put forward is convincing...yet!!!!


Well John, you are asking a manager to change things at City, who has been wrestling with the dilemma of how to break teams down away from home for fourteen months, without success. That is also a gamble. Quite possibly a bigger one.
Laudrup has been successful in the main. He has also always tried to get his teams playing decent football everywhere he has been, resources or not. Now that certainly wouldn't going to change if he came to City.
And I'd like it.
Especially after watching another underwhelming away effort tonight.
City and sniffing knickers.
Come on Blues.
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby MilnersJaw » Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:24 am

Blue Since 76 wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Spurs are the PL biggest spenders this season as far as I know.


According to transfermarkt.co.uk, they spent £65m this season (summer & January) which is more than I remembered. However, they also sold £47m, so only spent a net £17m.

Other net spends for comparison:
Chelsea £78m
Rags £54m
Liverpool £50m
Villa £22m!
Us £15m
Newcastle £15m
Arsenal £3.5m profit

Levy is a very shrewd operator and doesn't spend big. If he did, who knows what they could achieve.

Nice to see that the rags haven't bought the league, though. And for any Arsenal fans wondering why they're struggling...


did we really spend 15 mil? i thought rodwell along was 12 mil.
Still here.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby john68 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:54 am

Zurich/Piccs,
I don't doubt that Laudrup has the makings of bbeing a great manager, please don't think I was.

Where I think you are falling into a trap Roger is that your opinion regarding Mancini was formed quite early in his reign, and since, you have become quite forensic in your analysis of his mistakes. In that respect, I think your argument has lacked balance. You have been quick to criticise and jump on him for errors but have offered him much less credit for his successes.

I also think that you have lumped the blame for any losses onto his head without regard to the circumstances around him. I pointed out to you a long time ago that Mancini's record is far better than the great Joe Mercer and is also far ahead of Taggart's record over a similar building period.

You mounted your high horse when I asked whether you would have sacked Mercer. Particularly in 1968-69, when as Champions, we spent large chunks of the season wondering whether we were relegation candidates. A far worse record than we are now experiencing.

Are you surprised that our nearest rival who we sneaked past in the last minute last season has now overtaken us, having strengthened with Van Penis? Or that Chelsea despite having bought Hazard and Oscar are closer to us?

If you think Mancini is so poor, then what about the other 18 managers struggling behind us?

Or is this to with higher expectations and money?...Not a jibe, but a serious question.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby aaron bond » Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:11 am

MilnersJaw wrote:
Blue Since 76 wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Spurs are the PL biggest spenders this season as far as I know.


According to transfermarkt.co.uk, they spent £65m this season (summer & January) which is more than I remembered. However, they also sold £47m, so only spent a net £17m.

Other net spends for comparison:
Chelsea £78m
Rags £54m
Liverpool £50m
Villa £22m!
Us £15m
Newcastle £15m
Arsenal £3.5m profit

Levy is a very shrewd operator and doesn't spend big. If he did, who knows what they could achieve.

Nice to see that the rags haven't bought the league, though. And for any Arsenal fans wondering why they're struggling...


did we really spend 15 mil? i thought rodwell along was 12 mil.


NET spend.
aaron bond
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:11 pm
Location: Singapore
Supporter of: City

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:48 am

john68 wrote:Zurich/Piccs,
I don't doubt that Laudrup has the makings of bbeing a great manager, please don't think I was.

Where I think you are falling into a trap Roger is that your opinion regarding Mancini was formed quite early in his reign, and since, you have become quite forensic in your analysis of his mistakes. In that respect, I think your argument has lacked balance. You have been quick to criticise and jump on him for errors but have offered him much less credit for his successes.

I also think that you have lumped the blame for any losses onto his head without regard to the circumstances around him. I pointed out to you a long time ago that Mancini's record is far better than the great Joe Mercer and is also far ahead of Taggart's record over a similar building period.

You mounted your high horse when I asked whether you would have sacked Mercer. Particularly in 1968-69, when as Champions, we spent large chunks of the season wondering whether we were relegation candidates. A far worse record than we are now experiencing.

Are you surprised that our nearest rival who we sneaked past in the last minute last season has now overtaken us, having strengthened with Van Penis? Or that Chelsea despite having bought Hazard and Oscar are closer to us?

If you think Mancini is so poor, then what about the other 18 managers struggling behind us?

Or is this to with higher expectations and money?...Not a jibe, but a serious question.


Of course its to do with higher expectations. And the nature of the modern game.
As we have discussed in great detail when referring to FFP, money has a direct link with succeas now. I have said for many years, that for the shite to miss the top four would be as poor a season as say, Villa getting relegated. We are now in that bracket with them.
At the start of the season there was to be a two horse race and we are many furlongs back in that. In fact missing out on the top four has looked more likely than retaining our title. Thankfully that spectre was banished last night I'd guess.
And so yes, its bloody unfair and irrelevent to compare Bob with Mercer. So stop it!
Not forgetting our failings in Europe. Yes we have had tough groups, but are dismal showing this year will probably see us back in pot 3 again next season and potentially getting lumped into another "group of death". Its important for the club's development we do well in the Chumps League.

As you know only too well though Mr68, my really gripe is the style we have gone about things with some really turgid displays, wasting some of the finest attacking talent in world football.

And John, it doesn't necessarily need to be Laudrup. You asked me for namres and so I gave you two examples, Martinez and Laudrup.

Finally, I think you should give over with this "how long would you give the next manager" line, as you well know that I usually take the "stability" course, and don't want to see change for changes sake.

When the day comes, and a new manager has us playing with vim and vigour, it will feel like a breath of fresh air. Mark my words.
And we'll all be able to see the difference.
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby john68 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:57 pm

There is just so much wrong with that reply mate. So much expectation, based on so very little.

"MONEY...has a direct link with success" (well usually or often but not always). It took City from a long way down to an FA Cup win, a League Title and a Community Shield win. For me that buys Mancini some time to develop the next phase and certainly buys him more than a few months of the subsequent season, which is when you were asking for his execution.

"There was to be a two horse race"....Sez who?... SSN? Talkshite, Radio Manchester? The Mirror, Sun, Mail, Express? Our nearest rivals both strengthened significantly, Hazard, Oscar and Van Penis particularly. We by contrast let de Jong go and weakened. Whoever Mancini's targets were, for whatever reason, be it finance, Marwood or orders from above, Mancini never got anywhere near the likes of de Rossi, Cavani et al, nor any of the above mentioned that we were supposedly in the market for. Yet you thought it was going to be a two horse race. In God's name why?

Why do ignore the evidence of Kaldhoon's own words? It would allow you to understand why 2 windows have gone by and whilst our competitors have bought, we have sold. But for some reason, that has had no impact on your expectations.

"Missing out on top 4 has looked more likely than retaining our title"...Technically a correct statement, but used in the manner to overstate the danger of our demise, just not true. For most of the season, the gap between us and the team lying 5th has been extremely safe. None of the chasing pack has shown much evidence of putting a winning run together, all have been up and down. It is only since that run of quite recent Liverpool, Southampton results that the gap between us and the chasing group has in any way narrowed. At the time you started to call for Mancini's head, we were quite safe.

"It's bloody unfair and irrelevant to compare Bob with Mercer"...Unfair to who or what? Maybe unfair to your argument Mate. As for relevance, never have 2 seasons and the situation been so similar. In the season following our '68 title win, by the same stage of the season, we were sat somewhere near the bottom end of the division. Not 2nd, as we are now. Our results had been abysmal all season and our expectations totally shattered from almost the 1st week of the season. At the similar time of the season, we were on the way to an FA Cup win at Wembley...which is exactly the same position we are in now. Coincidentally, we had also fallen out of the European Cup versus a team few of us had then heard of (Fenerbahce), at the 1st hurdle. I'd say that was extremely relevant Roger....and for the record, check how poorly we were doing the next season too. Legend or not, hero or not, historic figure or not, Mercer's record at that point was far inferior to Mancini's.That is not my opinion, it is a FACT.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby john68 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:24 pm

...and could I please nail this myth that Mancini knows only one way to play and has no plan B.

Just taking those eleven very highly successful early games of last season that you want Mancini tactically to revert back to. Which particular set up do you want him to revert to? Is it the 4.4.3 of the Swansea, Bolton or Villa games? The 4.4.1.1 of the Spurs, Wigan, Fulham, Everton, rags, Wolves, QPR or Newcastle? Or is it the 4.5.1 of the Blackburn game? And if you are accusing Mancini of not attempting to change things around, maybe you should look at the fact Mancini deployed 4 different team set ups over last season.
(the source of that is the club's own published figures.) Maybe I got them because I was happy to come out of the pub and look. Soz mate, just couldn't resist that last line...:-).

Once again Piccs, I will reiterate that I was NOT criticising nor ridiculing your choice of naming Laudrup. I think he could well be an excellent manager. I was expressing my amusement at you using such piss poor comparative evidence as your argument.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Blue Since 76 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:22 pm

john68 wrote:
"It's bloody unfair and irrelevant to compare Bob with Mercer"...Unfair to who or what? Maybe unfair to your argument Mate. As for relevance, never have 2 seasons and the situation been so similar. In the season following our '68 title win, by the same stage of the season, we were sat somewhere near the bottom end of the division. Not 2nd, as we are now. Our results had been abysmal all season and our expectations totally shattered from almost the 1st week of the season. At the similar time of the season, we were on the way to an FA Cup win at Wembley...which is exactly the same position we are in now. Coincidentally, we had also fallen out of the European Cup versus a team few of us had then heard of (Fenerbahce), at the 1st hurdle. I'd say that was extremely relevant Roger....and for the record, check how poorly we were doing the next season too. Legend or not, hero or not, historic figure or not, Mercer's record at that point was far inferior to Mancini's.That is not my opinion, it is a FACT.


So could it be argued that Mercer wasn't actually all that good?...

Wasn't around at the time, but he didn't build a longer term legacy, like say a Shankley. Has his legendary status come about due to the very poor managers who followed him? If we'd brought in say a Clough, would anyone remember Mercer?

And now I'm running before my dad strings me up.
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby City64 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:56 pm

john68 wrote:Zurich/Piccs,
I don't doubt that Laudrup has the makings of bbeing a great manager, please don't think I was.

Where I think you are falling into a trap Roger is that your opinion regarding Mancini was formed quite early in his reign, and since, you have become quite forensic in your analysis of his mistakes. In that respect, I think your argument has lacked balance. You have been quick to criticise and jump on him for errors but have offered him much less credit for his successes.

I also think that you have lumped the blame for any losses onto his head without regard to the circumstances around him. I pointed out to you a long time ago that Mancini's record is far better than the great Joe Mercer and is also far ahead of Taggart's record over a similar building period.

You mounted your high horse when I asked whether you would have sacked Mercer. Particularly in 1968-69, when as Champions, we spent large chunks of the season wondering whether we were relegation candidates. A far worse record than we are now experiencing.




Are you surprised that our nearest rival who we sneaked past in the last minute last season has now overtaken us, having strengthened with Van Penis? Or that Chelsea despite having bought Hazard and Oscar are closer to us?

If you think Mancini is so poor, then what about the other 18 managers struggling behind us?

Or is this to with higher expectations and money?...Not a jibe, but a serious question.



Excellent post John68
Not really here

Fuck VAR
User avatar
City64
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10741
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Location: Urmston, Shevington , The Etihad , In a bar anywhere watching MCFC
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby john68 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:07 pm

If I am to be brutally honest under Joe Mercer, City were very successful at winning trophies but apart from winning the title once, our League record was quite poor. His record lags behind the likes of Shankly and Clough by some margin.

The thing about Mercer was not just his football record, much of it was about the man. He was a thorough gentleman that became universally loved and respected. In City terms, he was not simply a manager, he was so much more, The Father of the club. Supported as a manager and loved as a man.

He fully deserves his special place in our history.

My argument to Piccs is solely based on football records in almost identical football circumstances....and Mancini's record is superior. I fully believe that had Mercer been in place today, his record would have seen him sacked or under very severe pressure.
I also think that Taggart would not have survived his early years under today's environment.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby Blue Since 76 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:27 pm

john68 wrote:
My argument to Piccs is solely based on football records in almost identical football circumstances....and Mancini's record is superior. I fully believe that had Mercer been in place today, his record would have seen him sacked or under very severe pressure.
I also think that Taggart would not have survived his early years under today's environment.


Interesting to read and I agree about the last bits - they'd probably both have been sacked, Taggart especially considering the team had finished 2nd the season previous and he almost got them relegated. What could have been...
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Pick the manager.

Postby zuricity » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:55 pm

City64 wrote:
Excellent post John68


i don't mind being quoted, but i don't like the association . I don't agree with Piccs at all on this one. indeed John i feel is correct.

Moreover this debate should take place after the season finishes, the ride isn't over yet.

Furthermore as Slim mentioned elsewhere today about Roberto, trophies we haven't seen for years... keep on doing it Bobby Manc.
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18411
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: C & C, Google [Bot], Indianablue, Pretty Boy Lee, salford city, stevefromdonny, stupot, Wonderwall and 148 guests