Beefymcfc wrote:Just sit there and shut your mouth!
We are nothing more than paying entertainees nowadays and the easier to hurd us in and out the better. In this present day the likes of Hillsborough and Heysal will always be in light with the powers that be, and who can blame them, but the reality is that we have changed over the years whereas the powers that be have not.
Over 4 decades of football, and understanding every era, this is one of the worst I've seen. The supporter has no rights whatsoever and it was better to get a slap and watch the game than getting kicked out for being a little bit unreasonable.
BlueinBosnia wrote:A tough one, that. If they find it offensive, though, I'd say it's offensive.
DoomMerchant wrote:
altho, to be fair i learned while working with an HIV analytics data team in the mid 90s in SF that many men don't identify as "gay" but are referred to, epidemiologically i suppose, as "men who have sex with men."
In which case, you don't have a boyfriend....you just fuck your neighbor, who happens to be a man as well. No biggie.
if those offended fans aren't creative enough to find a more interesting comeback to a troglodyte call out like that then maybe they shouldn't be at a football match. Amiwrong?
cheers
Im_Spartacus wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:
altho, to be fair i learned while working with an HIV analytics data team in the mid 90s in SF that many men don't identify as "gay" but are referred to, epidemiologically i suppose, as "men who have sex with men."
In which case, you don't have a boyfriend....you just fuck your neighbor, who happens to be a man as well. No biggie.
if those offended fans aren't creative enough to find a more interesting comeback to a troglodyte call out like that then maybe they shouldn't be at a football match. Amiwrong?
cheers
I think its the club complaining, not the fans. And your point shows exactly why such lazy stereotypical labels are offensive to some - although i'm pretty sure that most homosexual men would have a smile about such a chant rather than throw a queenie strop on the concourse and totter off home.
The precedent for all this was set with the sol campbell case - if somebody finds it offensive, is a criminal offence in this day and age. The club could and should take a hard line and eject people who make those chants, exactly as clubs do now when"town full of pakis" for example is sung by a small minority, until such time as people decide its not worth the hassle of missing the game.
Not saying its right to take that approach, but "hate" as defined by the courts is just as much about homophobia as it is about the black/asian man, so the fan caught doing those chants wouldnt have a leg to stand on.
Beefymcfc wrote:Most chants could be construed as offensive so we may as well just sit on our hands.
Beefymcfc wrote:Most chants could be construed as offensive so we may as well just sit on our hands.
Sister of fu wrote:Is it acceptable to call people homophobic names and that be ok as its “banter”??
Sister of fu wrote:Homophobic comments don’t get the same treatment as say a racist one. Its ok to take the piss out of some bloke if he wears a pink shirt say in the away end and fans call him homophobic names, imagine if as fans we did the same if he was black?? I have heard stewards call dykes and all sorts stood at City and no bats an eye lid, call someone because of the colour of your skin you would get arrested. I’m sorry but that’s wrong. What’s banter and what’s not??? Is it acceptable to call people homophobic names and that be ok as its “banter”??
Sister of fu wrote:Homophobic comments don’t get the same treatment as say a racist one. Its ok to take the piss out of some bloke if he wears a pink shirt say in the away end and fans call him homophobic names, imagine if as fans we did the same if he was black?? I have heard stewards call dykes and all sorts stood at City and no bats an eye lid, call someone because of the colour of your skin you would get arrested. I’m sorry but that’s wrong. What’s banter and what’s not??? Is it acceptable to call people homophobic names and that be ok as its “banter”??
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Sister of fu wrote:Homophobic comments don’t get the same treatment as say a racist one. Its ok to take the piss out of some bloke if he wears a pink shirt say in the away end and fans call him homophobic names, imagine if as fans we did the same if he was black?? I have heard stewards call dykes and all sorts stood at City and no bats an eye lid, call someone because of the colour of your skin you would get arrested. I’m sorry but that’s wrong. What’s banter and what’s not??? Is it acceptable to call people homophobic names and that be ok as its “banter”??
I heard them talking about homophopia on national radio today ( well it was TalkSport) Andie and your name was mentioned as joining the fight.
Sister of fu wrote:the first out female footballer in England.
Sister of fu wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Sister of fu wrote:Homophobic comments don’t get the same treatment as say a racist one. Its ok to take the piss out of some bloke if he wears a pink shirt say in the away end and fans call him homophobic names, imagine if as fans we did the same if he was black?? I have heard stewards call dykes and all sorts stood at City and no bats an eye lid, call someone because of the colour of your skin you would get arrested. I’m sorry but that’s wrong. What’s banter and what’s not??? Is it acceptable to call people homophobic names and that be ok as its “banter”??
I heard them talking about homophopia on national radio today ( well it was TalkSport) Andie and your name was mentioned as joining the fight.
Yeah I am now the patron of Just a ball game? and the first out female footballer in England. Clarke Carlise is also a patron. He text me this week which was nice of him.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, BlueinBosnia, carolina-blue, Harry Dowd scored, Mase, Paul68, stupot and 128 guests