steveo_88 wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:steveo_88 wrote:I really can't believe what I'm reading. We've underperformed this year due to a culmination of factors and because of a few poor results along the way Joe Hart is suddenly a shite keeper and Costel 'HASN'T HAD A FUCLIN SAVE TO MAKE' is the answer?
Costel is slower than the illegitimate one running down the wing if he has to get down and actually save a shot. He attempts to catch less than De Gea and when he comes to punch is less than fifty fifty if he makes contact! I don't care if he plays in the upcoming derby but a serious chance of winning a pot? Have i missed the punchline?
That might be fair criticism except that Joe Hart catches less than Monty Panasar!
Yes I'm not impressed with that but that may be down to the coaching. In England we prefer keepers to catch the ball, outside the British Isles there's less emphasis on it, not an excuse, just they may be emphasising 'if you come - at least get something on it'. A sort of Casilias approach who hardly ever catches the ball. Joe still needs to improve in several areas of his game he's not the finished article.
Yet just because Joe is not the finished product there's still no justification for sticking a lumbering goon in net who for his size is an even worse catcher of the ball. Which for Costel is exacerbated by the fact he attempts to punch everything.
Costel is never going to be a Buffon, Casilias, Cech, Van Der Sar, Kahn or even a Hart. IMO he's not even as accomplished as Carlo Nash or Nicky Weaver.
Well, for starters, Casillas is about 6ft, while Hart is 6'5 & twice as wide. With his stature he should be clothes-lining players left & right to catch the ball most of the time instead of punching. It's a weakness, not as bad as his atrocious kicking, but there's no way around it. It can lead to danger if the ball ends up with the opposition at the edge of the box, which seems to happen quite frequently.
A lumbering goon? That's just silly. Pants might not be as agile as Hart & other keepers (understandable with his build) & he has spilled the odd cross or shot during his time here, but most of the time he's been pretty assured.
I seem to remember that Stoke played their 2nd keeper in the FA Cup Final 2010. Granted, he played out of his skin, but it would be interesting what their fans thought of it before the game.
In my opinion, if you have two decent keepers (even if one of them is superior) & you decide to hand one the Cup competitions & he doesn't concede a goal & most importantly doesn't cock up, you should stick with him. Now, if you had some gimp like Ross Turnbull as 2nd choice, there wouldn't even be a debate, but this isn't the case here, so... debate away.