sheblue wrote:I dont think its a case of an isco 'alternative' as it looks like the club and mr Pelligrini thought that isco was so good they wanted him no matter how many midfielders were at the club already. They would fit him in.
.
I agree. He's an upgrade to what we have available on the left (Silva or Nasri, neither of whom are comfortable), but I think it was more a case of getting a player they believe will be the next big thing. In the same way that if Messi became available for a realistic price, we'd have to be in for him - better player, obviously, but a player you would find room for, regardless of who you already had.
Personally seen very little of him, but any article I've read about him rates him very highly and another good season could see him pushing Silva, Cazorla, Mata for a place in the WC squad. If we were willing to spend around £25m on him, then I guess we rate him highly too. As do Madrid.
The proof will be whether we go after an alternative or stick with Silva, Nasri and Navas to do that role. I suspect well stick, but time will tell.