feedthegreek wrote:another negative article here, the dailly mirror as well.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... er-2126333
How is it anyone at uniteds fault that united have been linked with unrealistic transfer targets, it's the media who make up the ridiculous transfer stories, have united bid for the likes bale and ronaldo? No? The only ONE player united have publicly commented on is fabregas the fact you guys make this stuff up to sell papers is no reflection on motes or Woodward, just another pathetic attempt to have a pop at moyes before the season has even started, shoddy journalism again
Another pile of tosh served up by the ever reliable anti United comic the mirror!! Honestly every bloody story in the last month involving United on here is negative!! Even if there's a glimmer of positivity you guys still find a negative!!!
One target Fabregas!!!! "ONE" can you read that you idiotic fools!! And yes while it seems like a pointless task going for him United must no something you Journo's don't "no way" .. Lol which in its self is hardly surprising is it? ..seeing as tho most of your news is old/cut and paste or just blatantly made up!
Oh how you've waited for the non Fergie years....
After selling Ronaldo in 2009 for 80 million and several lesser players in the following years, up to last year Manchester United have spent "net zero" on transfer fees in the last 5 years, meanwhile Chelsea and Man City respectively have spent close to 400 and 500million, Now they have no Fergie and if Rooney goes is sold to their rival David Moyes will surely face a long hard season ahead while the Glaziers continue to siphon off 100's of millions each year.to finance their debt.
So is that all your gonna bring to the argument? Stop moaning?
Should have aimed for Cabaye or Eriksson. All this Fabregas business has made us lose more ground in this window. I would have liked us to buy a left back, 2 wingers, def mid, playmaker and a striker if Rooney is to leave. All I can see happening is Fellaini coming on the last day of the window. Why let David Gill leave same time as Fergie?
It sounds to me like 2010 when we sold ronnie and didnt take the tevez option. We made a lot of noise about finding world class replacements with the 80 million we got for ronnie but we ended up signing Owen on a free and Valencia for 16 million. I can see us selling Rooney for 30 mil and buying 1 or 2 players for a combined sun of about 30 million.
I totally agree. We need to go for a more realistic target
saulman wrote:I thought Coke and Pepsi were owned by the same company. Stories like this make great advertising for both side.
saulman wrote:I thought Coke and Pepsi were owned by the same company. Stories like this make great advertising for both side.
ant london wrote:saulman wrote:I thought Coke and Pepsi were owned by the same company. Stories like this make great advertising for both side.
I can't decide whether you are taking the piss or not here??
I think you are but just in case not might I suggest http://www.google.com
john@staustell wrote:saulman wrote:I thought Coke and Pepsi were owned by the same company. Stories like this make great advertising for both side.
One of the first things you ever learn in life mate is that Coke and Pepsi are NOT the same company!!
CTID Hants wrote:
Ha Ha,
So much so that if someone asks for a Coke and they sell Pepsi under the trades descriptions act 1974 they HAVE to inform the customer they are not getting coke!! Coke actually send people out to check too!!
CTID Hants wrote:john@staustell wrote:saulman wrote:I thought Coke and Pepsi were owned by the same company. Stories like this make great advertising for both side.
One of the first things you ever learn in life mate is that Coke and Pepsi are NOT the same company!!
So much so that if someone asks for a Coke and they sell Pepsi under the trades descriptions act 1974 they HAVE to inform the customer they are not getting coke!! Coke actually send people out to check too!!
BlueinBosnia wrote:CTID Hants wrote:john@staustell wrote:saulman wrote:I thought Coke and Pepsi were owned by the same company. Stories like this make great advertising for both side.
One of the first things you ever learn in life mate is that Coke and Pepsi are NOT the same company!!
So much so that if someone asks for a Coke and they sell Pepsi under the trades descriptions act 1974 they HAVE to inform the customer they are not getting coke!! Coke actually send people out to check too!!
But Coke and Pepsi are the classic example of heightening/exaggerating brand rivalry so as to force other competitors out of the market. Between them, Coca Cola Company Ltd and PepsiCo have about 40% of the market share of ALL soft drinks (not just cola) worldwide.
Which countries is Pepsi more popular than cola in, by the way? When I was a kid, I thought they were about equal in Britain, but I'd say Coke is about 70% of the market now (with Pepsi being c.25% and other brands 5%). Coke is probably 95-99% in Belgium (due to abhorrent marketing campaigns that I'm sure would be illegal in any fully-modernised country), and in Bosnia, I'd say Pepsi is third in the market, behind Coke and Cockta, but Pepsi really does taste awful here and is packaged and promoted terribly.
ant london wrote:In the whole Middle East Pepsi dominates Coca Cola still. Believe it stems back to the 70s/80s when Coke opened a bottling plant or plants in Israel and were, consequently, boycotted.
From what I understand Ford had the same issue and you still don't see many on the road.
Alioune DVToure wrote:
People refuse to drink Pepsi in Spain. No bars stock it because people won't drink anything other than Coca-Cola. There are some prissy fucks over here.
I love 7 Up but you can hardly find that over here either. It shits all over Sprite in my opinion.
BlueinBosnia wrote:But Coke and Pepsi are the classic example of heightening/exaggerating brand rivalry so as to force other competitors out of the market. Between them, Coca Cola Company Ltd and PepsiCo have about 40% of the market share of ALL soft drinks (not just cola) worldwide.
Which countries is Pepsi more popular than cola in, by the way? When I was a kid, I thought they were about equal in Britain, but I'd say Coke is about 70% of the market now (with Pepsi being c.25% and other brands 5%). Coke is probably 95-99% in Belgium (due to abhorrent marketing campaigns that I'm sure would be illegal in any fully-modernised country), and in Bosnia, I'd say Pepsi is third in the market, behind Coke and Cockta, but Pepsi really does taste awful here and is packaged and promoted terribly.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: CTID Hants, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 96 guests