Pellegrini Satisfometer

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

How satisfied are you with Pellegrini's work to date?

Highly satisfied
79
41%
Satisfied
47
24%
Neither satisfied nor particularly dissatisfied
16
8%
Dissatisfied
23
12%
Highly dissatisfied
30
15%
 
Total votes : 195

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby DoomMerchant » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:16 pm

john68 wrote:
Cocacolajojo wrote:Nicked this from another site:

Here's the point's tally after nine games the last 7 seasons

2013/14 16 p
2012/13 21 p
2011/12 25 p
2010/11 17 p
2009/10 18 p
2008/09 13 p
2007/08 19 p

Pellegrini is 3 points better than Hughes in 2008-2009...


When you consider theamount of resources put into the team and amount of strengthening, that list makes very poor reading.


holistic, at best.

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby ashton287 » Mon Oct 28, 2013 6:55 pm

Goaters 103 wrote:Main difference between Pellegrini and Mancini so far? Pellegrini got a far easier CL draw than Mancini ever did.

The players also like Pellegrini a lot more than Mancini.

13 games in and we cant defend with any confidence, remain completely reliant on an injury prone player, and sit 7th after losing 3 of the first 9 games. Those are the facts. Pellegrini is paid to make this team better and so far Id submit that it isn't any better or worse than it was last year. Over to you Manuel.


It is definitely worse than last year.
User avatar
ashton287
De Jong's Tackle
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5070
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: De jong

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby DoomMerchant » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:01 pm

sadly, the wife, in an animated fashion after Sunday's loss said:

"why did they fire Mancini for this bullshit? This guy is an old loser. I hate him."

she's being a bit lowbrow about it, but....i didn't really have a good riposte.

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Im_Spartacus » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:12 pm

DoomMerchant wrote:sadly, the wife, in an animated fashion after Sunday's loss said:

"why did they fire Mancini for this bullshit? This guy is an old loser. I hate him."

she's being a bit lowbrow about it, but....i didn't really have a good riposte.

cheers


Hate! Strong word, does she think he's a nonce like Ashton?
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9574
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi
Supporter of: .

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby MilnersJaw » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:42 pm

I'm nt satisfied with the fact he hasn't got the balls to drop hart, plays Garcia And nasti ahead of lescott. Bar thy though he is good.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Tokyo Blue » Tue Oct 29, 2013 6:48 am

DoomMerchant wrote:sadly, the wife, in an animated fashion after Sunday's loss said:

"why did they fire Mancini for this bullshit? This guy is an old loser. I hate him."

she's being a bit lowbrow about it, but....i didn't really have a good riposte.

cheers

Surely you could have told her how the two Spaniards have got everything under control.
Your right leg I like; I've got nothing against your right leg. The trouble is neither have you.
Tokyo Blue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Bert Trautmann's Neck
 
Posts: 12339
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:33 am

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby AG7 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:35 am

Cocacolajojo wrote:Nicked this from another site: Here's the point's tally after nine games the last 7 seasons 2013/14 16 p 2012/13 21 p 2011/12 25 p 2010/11 17 p 2009/10 18 p 2008/09 13 p 2007/08 19 p Pellegrini is 3 points better than Hughes in 2008-2009...


Only last three seasons matter when we finished 3rd, 1st and 2nd (with 17, 25 and 21 pts) ... and right now we stand worst of all three (16 pts) ... says it all really!
User avatar
AG7
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2551
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:48 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Agueroooooo!

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:49 am

sheblue wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:He got his tactics right today but his defence is a fucking shambles & he is paid to fix it.


Yes the tactics were right, and we were very unlucky but the mistakes in defence were made in the summer 100 m spent and not a decent defender brought in when it was obvious we had/have problems there.



Aaaaaaaaannnnddd that's where the spaniards come in.

I knew that if they'd make mistakes in transfer market it would be manager who would have to shoulder the blame. That's why I've never been fan of the Director of Football system.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Ted Hughes » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:05 am

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
sheblue wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:He got his tactics right today but his defence is a fucking shambles & he is paid to fix it.


Yes the tactics were right, and we were very unlucky but the mistakes in defence were made in the summer 100 m spent and not a decent defender brought in when it was obvious we had/have problems there.



Aaaaaaaaannnnddd that's where the spaniards come in.

I knew that if they'd make mistakes in transfer market it would be manager who would have to shoulder the blame. That's why I've never been fan of the Director of Football system.


Not having that.

The transfer targets were discussed with Pellegrini & he got most of what he asked for but he's ended up with an ageing cb he trusts rather than a younger one. If he had seen it as a priority, we would have a younger one.

He has bought into the bollocks about Nastasic being fantastic, same as half the people on here, & gone for a bit of experience as backup to Vinny, to play next to Nastasic, & there lies the problem.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Original Dub » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:30 am

I'm not buying into this whole thing that our points tally should be better than previous years because we have spent more.

Leave that up to the media and martin tyler.

I've seen plenty of seasons where the rags made big signings and get off to slow starts while they settle in, only to go on and win the league. And they had the same manager and staff in place.

No team has settled into the league so far this season. Liverpool and arsenal are over achieving, while chelsea are beginning to grind into gear.

We have had the most change at the club, so it's a bit childish jumping up and down saying "I told you so" at this stage.

And worse to be blaming it on the manager not looking confident on the sidelines, or a clown... or a nonce.

Come on ffs, after being handed a week of three away games, with moscow in the middle and the toughest fixture of the year at the end, then coming unstuck by a freak fuck up...

I can see improvement. I can see players that need dropping, but I can see plenty of reasons not to be bitter about getting rid of the last guy... or for getting in this guy.

But I can't understand why after what would have been the perfect week, that folk are losing their mind at the manager.
Original Dub
 

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Ted Hughes » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:36 am

Original Dub wrote:I'm not buying into this whole thing that our points tally should be better than previous years because we have spent more.

Leave that up to the media and martin tyler.

I've seen plenty of seasons where the rags made big signings and get off to slow starts while they settle in, only to go on and win the league. And they had the same manager and staff in place.

No team has settled into the league so far this season. Liverpool and arsenal are over achieving, while chelsea are beginning to grind into gear.

We have had the most change at the club, so it's a bit childish jumping up and down saying "I told you so" at this stage.

And worse to be blaming it on the manager not looking confident on the sidelines, or a clown... or a nonce.

Come on ffs, after being handed a week of three away games, with moscow in the middle and the toughest fixture of the year at the end, then coming unstuck by a freak fuck up...

I can see improvement. I can see players that need dropping, but I can see plenty of reasons not to be bitter about getting rid of the last guy... or for getting in this guy.

But I can't understand why after what would have been the perfect week, that folk are losing their mind at the manager.


I don't actually blame the Count for this one, but I would be doing had Cahill or Torres scored first half when Demichelis & Nastasic were stood scratching their arses. Then it would have been his fault for selection, but he got away with it.

Nobody can account for Joe Hart this season & had he done the same last season, we would have the same, or less, points.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby john68 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:52 pm

Dub,
I don't think there is any residual bitterness about the previous manager. I do think that now people are doing what seemed to be suppressed by that accusation at the time...questioning CHANGE, whether it was necessary and whether the change made constituted progress.

Last season was considered by many to be a failed season, so it is wholly understandable with changes made and players brought in, that expectations should be a whole lot higher. The record shows that is patently not the case and we have at this stage gone backwards.

For all the whoopee and triumphalism about our attacking players, new attacking strategies and positive "go forward" philosophy, we have only scored 3 more goals at the same stage as last season and our goal difference is only 1 goal better.

Considering last season was considered a failed season, plus losing 3 games (compared to 0 losses last season), and the fact that we have 5 fewer points....it does seem that most of that unquestioning triumphal "whoop de doo" was a little misplaced.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Alioune DVToure » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:01 pm

Never misplace your whoop-de-doo.
Alioune DVToure
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6335
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:14 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby john68 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:04 pm

Alioune DVToure wrote:Never misplace your whoop-de-doo.


My whoop de doo is fine...when I remember where I put it.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Original Dub » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:48 pm

john68 wrote:Dub,
I don't think there is any residual bitterness about the previous manager. I do think that now people are doing what seemed to be suppressed by that accusation at the time...questioning CHANGE, whether it was necessary and whether the change made constituted progress.

Last season was considered by many to be a failed season, so it is wholly understandable with changes made and players brought in, that expectations should be a whole lot higher. The record shows that is patently not the case and we have at this stage gone backwards.

For all the whoopee and triumphalism about our attacking players, new attacking strategies and positive "go forward" philosophy, we have only scored 3 more goals at the same stage as last season and our goal difference is only 1 goal better.

Considering last season was considered a failed season, plus losing 3 games (compared to 0 losses last season), and the fact that we have 5 fewer points....it does seem that most of that unquestioning triumphal "whoop de doo" was a little misplaced.


Well mate, last season was considered a failure on reflection, not on prediction.
I would like to see who we had played at this point last season, the scores and also the champions league results thrown in, before we even go down the route of style.

Anyway, there was need for change because the manager lost the dressing room. If you don't like the guy they changed to based on the first to months of the season, that's fine, but tell us who we should have gone for, because Mancini was a goner. For all the reasons we've already debated countless times.

I was very unsatisfied with the Cardiff performance, the Hull performance and elements of the Bayern performance (taking into account how amazing they were).

I am more unsatisfied with the uncharacteristic fuck ups from individuals when we are completely dominating games. "Uncharacteristic" being a very operative word, because if it was "characteristic", the changes would have been made in the Summer transfer window.

This thread is about what elements of our poor performances are down to the manager we currently have. To me, that is mainly down to dressing room harmony and tactics, so I'm more than happy to discuss that.

I don't know what the harmony is like but based on how all of his previous players speak of him, I'm not concerned about it... yet.
Tactics - I wasn't happy about how his tactics in a few games - us lining up with two strikers away from home and against Bayern, when we should have been packing the midfield, being my main gripe - but he looks to have gotten wise to this and also has made some good reactive changes during games (Everton springs to mind).
Against Chelsea, I was impressed. Very impressed actually, because a game is about the 90 odd minutes and we were playing our toughest fixture and dominating.

He now knows that he is dealing with possible three players hitting bad the roughest patches since they arrived, but the market is closed so he has to depend, for now, on using his man management skills to build their confidence and try to iron out the mistakes between now and January.

As ever, we'll know after the Christmas run and the January window whether we are shit because of this man. Maybe he isn't the right man for the job - I certainly don't have any reason to want him out now based on what I've seen from him.

But anyone who tries to tell me that we shouldn't have gotten rid of Mancini and we made a mistake by hiring this guy, purely based on what we've seen so far... well, I would suspect an agenda more so than magnificent foresight.
Original Dub
 

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Ted Hughes » Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:20 pm

Original Dub wrote:
john68 wrote:Dub,
I don't think there is any residual bitterness about the previous manager. I do think that now people are doing what seemed to be suppressed by that accusation at the time...questioning CHANGE, whether it was necessary and whether the change made constituted progress.

Last season was considered by many to be a failed season, so it is wholly understandable with changes made and players brought in, that expectations should be a whole lot higher. The record shows that is patently not the case and we have at this stage gone backwards.

For all the whoopee and triumphalism about our attacking players, new attacking strategies and positive "go forward" philosophy, we have only scored 3 more goals at the same stage as last season and our goal difference is only 1 goal better.

Considering last season was considered a failed season, plus losing 3 games (compared to 0 losses last season), and the fact that we have 5 fewer points....it does seem that most of that unquestioning triumphal "whoop de doo" was a little misplaced.


Well mate, last season was considered a failure on reflection, not on prediction.
I would like to see who we had played at this point last season, the scores and also the champions league results thrown in, before we even go down the route of style.

Anyway, there was need for change because the manager lost the dressing room. If you don't like the guy they changed to based on the first to months of the season, that's fine, but tell us who we should have gone for, because Mancini was a goner. For all the reasons we've already debated countless times.

I was very unsatisfied with the Cardiff performance, the Hull performance and elements of the Bayern performance (taking into account how amazing they were).

I am more unsatisfied with the uncharacteristic fuck ups from individuals when we are completely dominating games. "Uncharacteristic" being a very operative word, because if it was "characteristic", the changes would have been made in the Summer transfer window.

This thread is about what elements of our poor performances are down to the manager we currently have. To me, that is mainly down to dressing room harmony and tactics, so I'm more than happy to discuss that.

I don't know what the harmony is like but based on how all of his previous players speak of him, I'm not concerned about it... yet.
Tactics - I wasn't happy about how his tactics in a few games - us lining up with two strikers away from home and against Bayern, when we should have been packing the midfield, being my main gripe - but he looks to have gotten wise to this and also has made some good reactive changes during games (Everton springs to mind).
Against Chelsea, I was impressed. Very impressed actually, because a game is about the 90 odd minutes and we were playing our toughest fixture and dominating.

He now knows that he is dealing with possible three players hitting bad the roughest patches since they arrived, but the market is closed so he has to depend, for now, on using his man management skills to build their confidence and try to iron out the mistakes between now and January.

As ever, we'll know after the Christmas run and the January window whether we are shit because of this man. Maybe he isn't the right man for the job - I certainly don't have any reason to want him out now based on what I've seen from him.

But anyone who tries to tell me that we shouldn't have gotten rid of Mancini and we made a mistake by hiring this guy, purely based on what we've seen so far... well, I would suspect an agenda more so than magnificent foresight.



I thought Mancini was dreadful last season but I don't like sacking managers & didn't want him sacking.

Now though, I'm delighted he's gone & would never want him back. We may have a shit defence but the attacking options are miles better & just prove to me how crap Bob was in that area. I like attacking football & it was doing my head in how he missed such obvious stuff like crosses. We have put more in during 3 months of the Count than 3 years of Mancini. He also had no idea about strikers linking up. We are so much better in that area, it's a joke how long we struggled on. Watford had more cohesion up front than we did by comparison.

If Pellegrini is to stay on though, he has to do better defensively imo, much better. But Hart is making that problem even worse, so we'll see.

I don't care that much if the Count stays or not, as I think the club is now on the right track, but I like half of what he's done, so I hope he sorts the other half.

If not, meh. We'll get another one & perhaps he will do both.

The club now has a philosophy of playing attacking pass & move football, huge resources, is building the best academy in the world.

We will find a suitable bloke to be at the front of that. In the meantime, I'm just glad it's not that God bothering weirdo. He's had his time & can rest assured he stands in history. Now he works for someone else. Well done & goodbye.

As for the Count; I think he will win the league, but unless he sorts the defence to a level where we can at least give Bayern a game, I won't be convinced.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:35 pm

I'm not sure if this is a talking point but I thought I'd add anyway.

This season we have conceded 11 goals and scored 21 (+10). Last season, at this point, we had conceded 9 and scored 18 (+9). The PL winning season we had conceded 7 and scored 33 (+26!).

Last season we had 21 points from 9 games, 16 from this. The PL winning season we had 25 points from 9, this season, well, you know the score.

The last time we had similar points to this was when we first made the CL (17 points) and the start of the season under Leslie (18 points). Prior to that we started the first 9 with 13 points.

Feeling confident?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Wonderwall » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:43 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:I'm not sure if this is a talking point but I thought I'd add anyway.

This season we have conceded 11 goals and scored 21 (+10). Last season, at this point, we had conceded 9 and scored 18 (+9). The PL winning season we had conceded 7 and scored 33 (+26!).

Last season we had 21 points from 9 games, 16 from this. The PL winning season we had 25 points from 9, this season, well, you know the score.

The last time we had similar points to this was when we first made the CL (17 points) and the start of the season under Leslie (18 points). Prior to that we started the first 9 with 13 points.

Feeling confident?


Thoroughly depressed after reading that. Cheers beefy
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28927
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby City64 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:47 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
City64 wrote:Pellegrini is making too many selection and tactical mistakes and it is costing us big style ! Most of his mistakes are understandable because he is learning the English Premier League and his squad of players . FFS though it is evident to all and sundrie that WE have the best squad of players by some margin to piss this league !!!! these guys are on huge salaries , how can they get things so wrong ???? Joe Hart has cost us probably 7 premier league points via his sub standard performances in premier league games at Cardiff , Villa and tonight at Chelsea ........ those 7 points would put us TOP of the Premier League !!!!! Our bench tonight at Chelsea was awesome quality ????? no team in the Premier League HAS that strength in depth ?????

Im am frustrated as fuck to what is going on ! how can Garcia commmand a place in the team when we have Negredo , Milner , Dzeko , Navas etc etc etc on the fucking bench ffs ????? and no Lescott ?????


I don't think his handling of the back 4 is 'understandable' any more than Mancini's was last season.

Both managers have been intent on trying to implement their own super smartarsed plans, rather than putting together the best defenders & working the shit out of them until they are organised.

Mancini did that years ago, then fucked it up by having tricky plans & picking his favourites, no matter how shit, & this bloke is doing the same.

Just pick the best defenders & defend properly for fucks sake.



Our bench was frighteningly quality on sunday at Stamford Bridge yet Pellegrini persists with Garcia who is frighteningly shite .....


and we miss Kompany like fuck Ted .
Not really here

Fuck VAR
User avatar
City64
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10741
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Location: Urmston, Shevington , The Etihad , In a bar anywhere watching MCFC
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Pellegrini Satisfometer

Postby Peter Doherty (AGAIG) » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:49 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:I'm not sure if this is a talking point but I thought I'd add anyway.

This season we have conceded 11 goals and scored 21 (+10). Last season, at this point, we had conceded 9 and scored 18 (+9). The PL winning season we had conceded 7 and scored 33 (+26!).

Last season we had 21 points from 9 games, 16 from this. The PL winning season we had 25 points from 9, this season, well, you know the score.

The last time we had similar points to this was when we first made the CL (17 points) the start of the season under Leslie (18 points). Prior to that we started the first 9 with 13 points.

Feeling confident?

Yes. No stand-out teams like in previous seasons so this one will have many twists and turns before the picture becomes clearer. When I say no stand-out teams, there is one but they're intent on making things interesting with some slapstick goalkeeping/defending.
Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7170
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:15 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Johan Cruyff

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 114 guests