***mackems v super city official match thread***

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Ted Hughes » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:45 pm

sheblue wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
Bleed_Blue wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Is that the rags above

Oh dear.


Have to choose if we want to see Rags above or loose the league early to Arsenal ...cannot be more awful

Spurs lost atleast .. thankfully


How the fuck can anybody give up the league to that bunch of bang average spineless cunts at this stage ?

Have a look at their fucking performance so far. We were miles better than that, whether we lost or not. The rags haven't needed to get out of 2nd gear.

Perhaps now Arsenal have Jones, Evans & Smalling to go at in Utd's back 4, the cunts will manage an attack in the next 45 mins ?

People really think those wankers will just cruise along all season without fucking up ? Not a hope in hell.


Although I hate admitting it they are defending much better than us at the moment.


By 2 goals, & they are supposed to be 'tight at the back' & we have had a aknowledged nightmare start & we are still 4 goals better on g difference. Imagine if we become average ?
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Peter Doherty (AGAIG) » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:46 pm

DoomMerchant wrote:The good news is everyone kinda mostly blows, so there's that.

Yes. Someone's going to win this title by default. We can only hope it's us.
Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7170
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:15 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Johan Cruyff

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Original Dub » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:54 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
By 2 goals, & they are supposed to be 'tight at the back' & we have had a aknowledged nightmare start & we are still 4 goals better on g difference. Imagine if we become average ?


I was just saying that to a rag who was giving it the whole "and we were supposed to be in a crisis. .. your terrible defending will see you struggle".

Oh dear.
Original Dub
 

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Herb » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:58 pm

We're just 6 points adrift of the leaders and with 27 games to play.
Say no more.
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Ted Hughes » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:00 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
By 2 goals, & they are supposed to be 'tight at the back' & we have had a aknowledged nightmare start & we are still 4 goals better on g difference. Imagine if we become average ?


I was just saying that to a rag who was giving it the whole "and we were supposed to be in a crisis. .. your terrible defending will see you struggle".

Oh dear.


I was actually meaning Arsenal, got wrong end of stick. The rags are a goal worse off & about 11 behind on goal diff.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Hazy2 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:01 pm

A win would have had us sitting pretty, lucky no real damage done, this has to be he last weekend of away form shite. Some team puts a big run together it could be vital.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9693
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby jimtolmie_tache » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:02 pm

Getting tired of Kolarov. It's bad enough watching an endless ice hockey power play, without the inevitable left footed rugby conversion at the end from Aleks. Yes, he does a few good free kicks, but even that's fading out now.

United fans seem terrified at the thought of signing Leighton Baines, well fuck that, I'd have him at City tomorrow, stupid sideburns and all.
User avatar
jimtolmie_tache
Micah Richard's Penalty Dives
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:08 am
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Vincent Kompany

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Original Dub » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:09 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
I was actually meaning Arsenal, got wrong end of stick. The rags are a goal worse off & about 11 behind on goal diff.


Better again.
Original Dub
 

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Original Dub » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:10 pm

jimtolmie_tache wrote:Getting tired of Kolarov. It's bad enough watching an endless ice hockey power play, without the inevitable left footed rugby conversion at the end from Aleks. Yes, he does a few good free kicks, but even that's fading out now.

United fans seem terrified at the thought of signing Leighton Baines, well fuck that, I'd have him at City tomorrow, stupid sideburns and all.


Good first post, hard to argue with any of it.
Original Dub
 

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby MilnersJaw » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:11 pm

Remembrance Sunday? Nah don't want to remember this one cheers
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Ted Hughes » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:18 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
I was actually meaning Arsenal, got wrong end of stick. The rags are a goal worse off & about 11 behind on goal diff.


Better again.


We are 12 against. They are 13 against.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby ashton287 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:37 pm

Herb wrote:We're just 6 points adrift of the leaders and with 27 games to play.
Say no more.


13 of them are away though. At the current rate that's another 8 points all season. Today wasn't a flash in the pan break from the norm, it is how we have played away from home all season. If it hasn't changed yet and we have just lost to probably the worst side in the league, with the worst defence in the league. When will it change?

To add a bit of perspective. Only 1 team has ever lost more than 6 games in a season and gone on to win the league, that was in fucking 95. Your lucky to win it losing 6 games and most years the winner hasn't lost more than 5 games.

We have lost 4. Realistically we can lose 2 more games all season and even then we would be lucky to win the league. So that's 2 games when we have to go away to arsenal, Liverpool, Southampton, the rags, Everton and spurs.

It's not gonna happen.
User avatar
ashton287
De Jong's Tackle
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5070
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: De jong

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Original Dub » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:42 pm

ashton287 wrote:
13 of them are away though. At the current rate that's another 8 points all season. Today wasn't a flash in the pan break from the norm, it is how we have played away from home all season. If it hasn't changed yet and we have just lost to probably the worst side in the league, with the worst defence in the league. When will it change?

To add a bit of perspective. Only 1 team has ever lost more than 6 games in a season and gone on to win the league, that was in fucking 95. Your lucky to win it losing 6 games and most years the winner hasn't lost more than 5 games.

We have lost 4. Realistically we can lose 2 more games all season and even then we would be lucky to win the league. So that's 2 games when we have to go away to arsenal, Liverpool, Southampton, the rags, Everton and spurs.

It's not gonna happen.


Based on that post, bad shit just never changes. It's there for good.

I'm sorry to say it mate, but it's looking more and more like depression.

Man up ffs.
Original Dub
 

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Ted Hughes » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:53 pm

ashton287 wrote:
Herb wrote:We're just 6 points adrift of the leaders and with 27 games to play.
Say no more.


13 of them are away though. At the current rate that's another 8 points all season. Today wasn't a flash in the pan break from the norm, it is how we have played away from home all season. If it hasn't changed yet and we have just lost to probably the worst side in the league, with the worst defence in the league. When will it change?

To add a bit of perspective. Only 1 team has ever lost more than 6 games in a season and gone on to win the league, that was in fucking 95. Your lucky to win it losing 6 games and most years the winner hasn't lost more than 5 games.

We have lost 4. Realistically we can lose 2 more games all season and even then we would be lucky to win the league. So that's 2 games when we have to go away to arsenal, Liverpool, Southampton, the rags, Everton and spurs.

It's not gonna happen.


How many teams have won it on goal difference ?
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby ashton287 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:30 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
How many teams have won it on goal difference ?


Lightning might strike twice. Is that what your getting at?

It would need to strike 5 or 6 times at this rate for someone to hand us a title again.
User avatar
ashton287
De Jong's Tackle
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5070
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: De jong

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby mcfc1632 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:37 pm

sheblue wrote:
Clowncrete wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Richards played with much more attacking intelligence than Zabba imo.


Wasn't Richards out of position when the goal went in?


Richards was awful, his positional sense is awful, little overlapping with navas, just stood there static like a big lamp pole.



Ted - I rarely disagree with you - but if you or anyone else, thinks that Richards was more than a lazy and incompetent passenger then I am gobsmacked.

For me he was back to his utterly bewilderingly and useless jogging best (worst).

At least when Zabba came on the other players trusted him enough to pass to him - with Micah it was more like they were always thinking - what is this cunt doing?

Just what did he do of any value today? It was like we were playing with an agreed handicap of our 10 against their 11 until the 71st minute
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Denis4583 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:39 pm

It was dzekos fault
Denis4583
De Michelis's Pace
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:44 pm
Supporter of: ManCity
My favourite player is: Dzeko

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby Denis4583 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:39 pm

Go to bosnia:)
Denis4583
De Michelis's Pace
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:44 pm
Supporter of: ManCity
My favourite player is: Dzeko

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby MilnersJaw » Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:58 pm

To be fair I did not see micha make any contribution today. One positive thing was pellers taking Garcia and micha off for being utter shite. Shame he started with them
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: ***mackems v super city official match thread***

Postby sheblue » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:04 pm

Look if this away form continues its 4th place, last 16 exit from champs league and maybe a cup if lucky. That's it.
sheblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Bert Trautmann's Neck
 
Posts: 12552
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:28 pm
Supporter of: city
My favourite player is: silva

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: city72, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 149 guests