Panti Or Hart

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Who'd you want?

Hart
16
16%
Panti
80
82%
Richy
2
2%
 
Total votes : 98

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Mike J » Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:14 pm

Wonderwall wrote:Phillipe Courtois may be the answer, getting rave reviews for Athletico and is keeping Mignolet out of the Belgium team.

I am very surprised he is still on loan, I wouldnt be surprised to see him as Chelseas number 1 next season with a decent World Cup under his belt


Best keeper in the world for me at the minute. If city are thinking about replacing hart he'd be my No1 target. Highly doubt chelsea will sell him though. They cant keep him and cech happy though
User avatar
Mike J
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:48 pm
Supporter of: Who do you think
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Wonderwall » Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:39 pm

Mike J wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:Phillipe Courtois may be the answer, getting rave reviews for Athletico and is keeping Mignolet out of the Belgium team.

I am very surprised he is still on loan, I wouldnt be surprised to see him as Chelseas number 1 next season with a decent World Cup under his belt


Best keeper in the world for me at the minute. If city are thinking about replacing hart he'd be my No1 target. Highly doubt chelsea will sell him though. They cant keep him and cech happy though


I think Chelsea will extend his contract and keep him on loan at Athletico for another year, however, Mr Kompany might have a word in his ear in the summer tournament. He is a top keeper, and if Pellers is set on replacing Joe, then this would also be my No1 target.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Herb » Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:59 pm

Alioune DVToure wrote:I wonder what agreement we have with Panti behind the scenes. He's clearly better than a bog-standard PL No.13 (e.g. Hilario, Harper) and also seems to be very serious about being No.1 for his country. I can't imagine he's on more than about £20k per week, a wage he could pick up at a bottom-half club whilst also playing every week.

Stretford have a similar thing going on with Lindegaard, who's also very capable and in his prime. I wonder what keeps these guys motivated.

We all know that one clanger from Panti and Joe's back between the sticks.


I know where you're coming from Ali but I must make the moral case because if Joe H was allowed freedom to fumble and fuck-up regularly for 18+ months then Costel deserves at least the rest of this season to prove himself. I'm not saying that we shouldn't buy-in a back up for him, if it's thought that Joe's not going to get decent enough for reserve purposes in the short-term, but the ethical position is that Costel should have as much of our respect and patience as Joe had . . . . . . . . . . or perhaps a little less because 18+ months of putting up with Joe's comedy capers was a bit excessive!
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Breks » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:05 pm

Herb wrote:
I know where you're coming from Ali but I must make the moral case because if Joe H was allowed freedom to fumble and fuck-up regularly for 18+ months then Costel deserves at least the rest of this season to prove himself. I'm not saying that we shouldn't buy-in a back up for him, if it's thought that Joe's not going to get decent enough for reserve purposes in the short-term, but the ethical position is that Costel should have as much of our respect and patience as Joe had . . . . . . . . . . or perhaps a little less because 18+ months of putting up with Joe's comedy capers was a bit excessive!


Totally agree with you pal.
Breks
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:03 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Pablo Zabaleta

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:07 pm

Herb wrote:
Alioune DVToure wrote:I wonder what agreement we have with Panti behind the scenes. He's clearly better than a bog-standard PL No.13 (e.g. Hilario, Harper) and also seems to be very serious about being No.1 for his country. I can't imagine he's on more than about £20k per week, a wage he could pick up at a bottom-half club whilst also playing every week.

Stretford have a similar thing going on with Lindegaard, who's also very capable and in his prime. I wonder what keeps these guys motivated.

We all know that one clanger from Panti and Joe's back between the sticks.


I know where you're coming from Ali but I must make the moral case because if Joe H was allowed freedom to fumble and fuck-up regularly for 18+ months then Costel deserves at least the rest of this season to prove himself. I'm not saying that we shouldn't buy-in a back up for him, if it's thought that Joe's not going to get decent enough for reserve purposes in the short-term, but the ethical position is that Costel should have as much of our respect and patience as Joe had . . . . . . . . . . or perhaps a little less because 18+ months of putting up with Joe's comedy capers was a bit excessive!


Except of course that Joe has PROVED he can be world class keeper. Panti hasn't.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:21 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Herb wrote:
Alioune DVToure wrote:I wonder what agreement we have with Panti behind the scenes. He's clearly better than a bog-standard PL No.13 (e.g. Hilario, Harper) and also seems to be very serious about being No.1 for his country. I can't imagine he's on more than about £20k per week, a wage he could pick up at a bottom-half club whilst also playing every week.

Stretford have a similar thing going on with Lindegaard, who's also very capable and in his prime. I wonder what keeps these guys motivated.

We all know that one clanger from Panti and Joe's back between the sticks.


I know where you're coming from Ali but I must make the moral case because if Joe H was allowed freedom to fumble and fuck-up regularly for 18+ months then Costel deserves at least the rest of this season to prove himself. I'm not saying that we shouldn't buy-in a back up for him, if it's thought that Joe's not going to get decent enough for reserve purposes in the short-term, but the ethical position is that Costel should have as much of our respect and patience as Joe had . . . . . . . . . . or perhaps a little less because 18+ months of putting up with Joe's comedy capers was a bit excessive!


Except of course that Joe has PROVED he can be world class keeper. Panti hasn't.


You're right NQDP, Joe has built up a lot of good will because he was arguably the Premier League's best keeper for three years on the trot, that's why both Mancini and Pellegrini persevered with him despite his drop in form. The same faith can't be extended to Pantillimon, yet, as he hasn't proven himself. How people fail to grasp that is beyond me.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Sideshow Bob » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:59 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:You're right NQDP, Joe has built up a lot of good will because he was arguably the Premier League's best keeper for three years on the trot, that's why both Mancini and Pellegrini persevered with him despite his drop in form. The same faith can't be extended to Pantillimon, yet, as he hasn't proven himself. How people fail to grasp that is beyond me.


best PL keeper for 3 years on the trot...surely this is a clarkie?? hart has been at best average and at worst UTTER FUCKING DOGSHIT for nearly 2 years!!!
Sideshow Bob
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7886
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:19 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Jonny Evans

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:12 pm

Sideshow Bob wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:You're right NQDP, Joe has built up a lot of good will because he was arguably the Premier League's best keeper for three years on the trot, that's why both Mancini and Pellegrini persevered with him despite his drop in form. The same faith can't be extended to Pantillimon, yet, as he hasn't proven himself. How people fail to grasp that is beyond me.


best PL keeper for 3 years on the trot...surely this is a clarkie?? hart has been at best average and at worst UTTER FUCKING DOGSHIT for nearly 2 years!!!


Sorry, no idea what a 'clarkie' is.

2009/10 PFA goalkeeper of the year
2011/12 PFA goalkeeper of the year

Van Der Sar won it in between but don't think there was much to choose between them that year and feel VDS got the nod because he was retiring that year.

It's 2 years now is it? Not 18 months?
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Herb » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:47 pm

Blue Dreams, that goalkeeper of the year thing is absolute bollox because most of Joe's glory came from sitting behind a solid defence - might be worth you looking at the stats for saves made from shots in % terms because that might draw your attention to the fact that Joe Hart was nothing more than a very good shot stopper when at his very best and that he's always been either average or poor in all other goal keeping areas. We all wish he'd been better but he wasn't.
He can't handle a cross and never has been able to, he can't distribute quickly (must always fuck about until the opportunity's lost), he can't distribute accurately (hopeful punts in the main and often into the stand), he can't command his defence to the degree that the defenders have long since ignored his shouts when he bothers to make them and his positioning is terrible.
You might not see beyond his good looks and golden locks but the opposition are keenly aware of his failings and they've exploited them at our cost too often!

Joe Hart has not proven himself as a top international keeper. He is perhaps the best English keeper out there but that's only because we have shite keepers in England.

And please don't think it's personal because nobody's having a pop at Joe, we all wanted him to do well and we all supported him through a bad time but he didn't get better and it cost us dearly. The fact is that our trophy cabinet is lacking silverware (think of all the thousands of loyal Blues wasting money on the trip to Wembly last year - all because he couldn't handle the one shot he had to save?). We truly gave him more time than we could afford and he's now out and deserves to stay out whereas Costel is in and deserves to stay in so how about getting behind our current keeper rather than going on endlessly about loser Joe?
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Beefymcfc » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:48 pm

Remember, Joe is just having a rest.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Herb » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:52 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:Remember, Joe is just having a rest.


Well let's hope it's a rest for the rest of the season because I'd like us to be in with a shout for a trophy and that's not going to happen if the 'has-been in green' gets his clumsy paws on the jersey . . .

Having said that I'm sure it'd be on the floor if you threw it at him to catch.
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:02 pm

Surprise, surprise, there's a Herb post following mine, sorry Strawman you're still on my ignore list.

I'd put my mortgage on there being some fucking idiotic reference to Hart's hair in your post somewhere.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Herb » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:17 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Surprise, surprise, there's a Herb post following mine, sorry Strawman you're still on my ignore list.

I'd put my mortgage on there being some fucking idiotic reference to Hart's hair in your post somewhere.


Well done ForeverUpJoesArse, That's magic, I just love the way you put it out that you ignore me but you still can't help but post a reply to the post you didn't read. . . sort of don't want to know but so intrigued that you can't let go eh?

Oh, and if you ever do read my response to your post responding to my post that you didn't read then you'll see that you were half right as I did indeed make a reference to Hart's fucking idiotic hair . . . the hair you focus your life on . . . the hair you'd love to stroke . . . the hair that stops you from seeing the truth . . the magic dangerous truth-hiding hair that controls your every thought and every breath . . and . . oh I can't be arsed going on but you'll get the drift.
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:31 pm

I really find it strange that a City fan can be so OTT strong in his condemnation of a City player who is is considered by so many to be the best keeper England has bar none. No problems with the criticism of him and wanting him dropped but the strength of feeling is quite amazing.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby zuricity » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:00 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
I think Chelsea will extend his contract and keep him on loan at Athletico for another year, however, Mr Kompany might have a word in his ear in the summer tournament. He is a top keeper, and if Pellers is set on replacing Joe, then this would also be my No1 target.


Word in his ear, with a view to joining him at Athletico ?
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18391
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:11 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I really find it strange that a City fan can be so OTT strong in his condemnation of a City player who is is considered by so many to be the best keeper England has bar none. No problems with the criticism of him and wanting him dropped but the strength of feeling is quite amazing.


Harts tele ads and arrogance, along with his best mates group of scum mates from across the City probably have a lot to do with the resentment Doug.............maybe if the cunt was a little bit more humble then he would get more support.

If he starts doing his job better on a regular basis then people might not vent so much his way,....we have been waiting 19 months so far for that to happen.!
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32245
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Herb » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:28 pm

As a special response to Doug H, a man I have tremendous respect for.

In my defence I must point out that I gave Joe Hart my full support right through the issues he endured last season, that I really wanted him to start this season in flying form and that I was gutted when he came back playing even worse than last season.
I'm convinced, along with about 90% of us, that dropping him was the right thing to do but I do still quite like the fella (even if I'm not impressed with him being best mate to any rag that winks at him) and I'd applaud him if he turned out for us in the next game because I always applaud all of our players.

I admit that I have gone on about Joe's issues like a stuck record but that's not because of any hate for the man but as a retort to counter the odd notion that he's a world class keeper - which is something that he might be one day if he gets his head down and gets a lot better. In the interim I'd like to see Costel given the grace of the rest of this season to prove himself but that's just my opinion.
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.
Herb
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Out on the wiley, windy moors
Supporter of: City super City
My favourite player is: NOT Howler Hart!

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Beefymcfc » Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:27 pm

I do believe that Joe blamed a lot of his form on Mancini and also believe that Pellers has noticed this. A shot across the bow may do the trick and if he gets back to his young self then I don't think many can complain.

Panti over Joe, on form, come on?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:37 pm

Herb wrote:As a special response to Doug H, a man I have tremendous respect for.

In my defence I must point out that I gave Joe Hart my full support right through the issues he endured last season, that I really wanted him to start this season in flying form and that I was gutted when he came back playing even worse than last season.
I'm convinced, along with about 90% of us, that dropping him was the right thing to do but I do still quite like the fella (even if I'm not impressed with him being best mate to any rag that winks at him) and I'd applaud him if he turned out for us in the next game because I always applaud all of our players.

I admit that I have gone on about Joe's issues like a stuck record but that's not because of any hate for the man but as a retort to counter the odd notion that he's a world class keeper - which is something that he might be one day if he gets his head down and gets a lot better. In the interim I'd like to see Costel given the grace of the rest of this season to prove himself but that's just my opinion.


Fair enough.As I said it wasn't the opinion but the venom that seemed to be in it. I do think if Joe comes back next game or very soon Pants will be suitably gutted and look for the door.I wouldn't blame him.I have no doubt he has ambitions to be the best in the world.That might be a pipe dream but I think it's real in his thinking and he won't do it as a number 2 obviously.Whoever persuaded him to stay at City did a good job.

Similarly though I think if Joe doesn't get back sooner rather than later his ambitions to play for England in the world cup will almost force him to look elsewhere.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Panti Or Hart

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:43 am

Still talking bollox I see Herb. You had plenty of retorts to me filled with venom towards Hart and not once did I say he's 'world class'.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Pretty Boy Lee, Stan and 199 guests