Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Spurge wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Spurge wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:He doesn't need to clear the ball though. The only thing he can do there is head it and him heading it is far more risky then allowing the centre back to simply head it back to him. Smalling has it covered and If Hart stays on his line it's a simple header back. Really poor decision to come out and got lucky tonight.
I don't agree.
I think Hart was well aware that Smalling was not having a good game and he was all at sea in this particular passage of play. Hart made a decision quickly and took responsibility, he calledthe play early and Smalling chose to ignore him in keeping with his overall panicky performance and as a consequence obstructed Hart.
Yes England got lucky but this time it was not down to Hart unlike the judgement call he made at Chelsea.
Considering the level of pressure he's been under recently I was pleased it hadn't dented his confidence where taking responsibility is concerned. As Hodgson has said his record under his management suggests he has never let England down and that continued to be the case last night.
But the decision to come out was a wrong one. Even if Smalling ignored him, the only thing Hart can do is head it and he risks heading it straight to an opposition player who would then have an unguarded net to aim for.
But Smalling was in a far better position to deal with the ball than Hart and Smalling heading back to hart is a far safer option than Hart trying to head it out himself. I don't blame Smalling just as I didn't blame Nasti because as a centre back, that's your ball to deal with, not the keepers. You can't take chances. I'm all for Joe taking responsibility but not when it's not his responsibility to take.
There was no need for Hart to come out there. At all. He needs to stop these rash charges out the penalty area.
The two situations were very different. I don't blame nasti for the Chelsea incident - he unlike smalling new exactly what he was doing, he unlike smalling was in control of the situation, he even did the text book thing where playing back to the keeper is concerned and headed away from goal to safeguard against an OG.
Smalling on the other hand was all at sea, he did not have the ball under control, he was in serious danger of losing his man and as I've said Joe sensed it and took responsibility for it. Had he had headed it as you suggest the ball would have travelled away from goal - if he leaves it and smalling doesn't deal with it, it's one on one.
I do have a very different view to you BRF and I'm not trying to see this through blue tinted glasses, just an honest view and of course you are entitled to your own view.
By all means have your own view.
But the question remains, who do you want challenging for that ball, your centre back or keeper? Smalling imo did have that situation under control and Hart rushing out put him under unnecessary pressure.
And yes Hart may have headed it away from goal but last season he headed it away from goal in a similar situation to Ibrahmiovic who scored. Yes that was a wonder goal but with the keeper so far out his goal he risks leaving an unguarded net.
The prospect of a one on one if Smalling misses it, is far better for us that the prospect of an opposition player having an empty net to aim for.
Hart has now let in numerous goals for us and England by charging out his area when the situation absolutely did not call for it.
It was a very poor decision to come out for the ball and just created an unnecessary risk.
Thanks for letting me have my own view - the ibra example is about as bad an example as you could give - you even say so yourself.
Roy Hodgson said Hart has never let him down so not sure about the 'numerous' goals conceded in this manner for England, sure there have been a few for City, but to me it seems like you are just looking for any opportunity to have a pop at Hart now.
Deffo case closed on this.