typical mourinho

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: typical mourinho

Postby kinkylola » Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:34 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:League leaders?


well, I guess they had slipped down by then ... but I haven't rain man memorized the table.
kinkylola
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2787
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:39 pm
Location: Baltimore

Re: typical mourinho

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:36 pm

kinkylola wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:League leaders?


well, I guess they had slipped down by then ... but I haven't rain man memorized the table.

;-)

We beat the league leaders and we now play the league leaders, hopefully with the same outcome.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: typical mourinho

Postby kinkylola » Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:41 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:
kinkylola wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:League leaders?


well, I guess they had slipped down by then ... but I haven't rain man memorized the table.

;-)

We beat the league leaders and we now play the league leaders, hopefully with the same outcome.


no argument from me
kinkylola
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2787
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:39 pm
Location: Baltimore

Re: typical mourinho

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:18 pm

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Thank goodness we never went for him. He has a side with players such as Oscar, mata , lampard and hazard and they end up playing football as exciting as a tony pulis stoke side.


Ouch; that might be a little harsh on Pulis.
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: typical mourinho

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:27 pm

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Thank goodness we never went for him. He has a side with players such as Oscar, mata , lampard and hazard and they end up playing football as exciting as a tony pulis stoke side.


Ouch; that might be a little harsh on Pulis.

I've noticed that the other 2 Spanish maestro's aren't getting a look in this season. I'd take either of them in a shot, preferably Mata.

Maureen is a fucking idiot cutting his nose off to make a point. Looks to me that he's forcing him out of the club to free up a few quid for a decent striker. Wonder if Wiggy is really injured or they're saving him from injury to sell onto Chelsea.

Mata - Shrek switch? It's suit both teams I'd guess.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: typical mourinho

Postby Clowncrete » Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:40 pm

Spurge wrote:
Clowncrete wrote:[highlight]Chelsea have been dire so far. I thought they would be title contenders but they look very poor everytime I see them.[/highlight] They have got loads of results due to fluke goals or refereeing decisions. Many of their key goals have come from set-pieces as well, which is surprising.

I have a feeling mourinho wanted the rag job and didn't get it and is now doing a half-hearted job for Chelsea so far. He has tried to piss of Chelsea's best player and best striker as well. I think he is waiting for Gollum's sacking and will jump on the rag job after that.


Well however you want to describe their performances they are title contenders at this moment in time - have you looked at the table recently?


So? The rags were awful last season but got results by sheer luck, refereeing decisions or Van Rapist's clinical finishing. Chelsea have won so many games by fluke this season. Against Aston Villa, Ivanovic scored but shouldn't have been on the field. Ramirez dived to get a point against West Brom. A Completely jammy victory because of a misunderstanding between Hart and Nasty. Another lucky one vs Sunderland. Getting a crucial goal against Cardiff which should have been chalked off. The table lies.
Clowncrete
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 11:35 am
Location: Land of holy cows
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Super Kev!

Re: typical mourinho

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:53 pm

Clowncrete wrote:
Spurge wrote:
Clowncrete wrote:[highlight]Chelsea have been dire so far. I thought they would be title contenders but they look very poor everytime I see them.[/highlight] They have got loads of results due to fluke goals or refereeing decisions. Many of their key goals have come from set-pieces as well, which is surprising.

I have a feeling mourinho wanted the rag job and didn't get it and is now doing a half-hearted job for Chelsea so far. He has tried to piss of Chelsea's best player and best striker as well. I think he is waiting for Gollum's sacking and will jump on the rag job after that.


Well however you want to describe their performances they are title contenders at this moment in time - have you looked at the table recently?


So? The rags were awful last season but got results by sheer luck, refereeing decisions or Van Rapist's clinical finishing. Chelsea have won so many games by fluke this season. Against Aston Villa, Ivanovic scored but shouldn't have been on the field. Ramirez dived to get a point against West Brom. A Completely jammy victory because of a misunderstanding between Hart and Nasty. Another lucky one vs Sunderland. Getting a crucial goal against Cardiff which should have been chalked off. The table lies.

Feck me, don't say they are akin to the Rags last season, that'd be us all fecked and a sure sign that Chelsea are winning the league.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: typical mourinho

Postby twosips » Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:36 pm

Clowncrete wrote:
Spurge wrote:
Clowncrete wrote:[highlight]Chelsea have been dire so far. I thought they would be title contenders but they look very poor everytime I see them.[/highlight] They have got loads of results due to fluke goals or refereeing decisions. Many of their key goals have come from set-pieces as well, which is surprising.

I have a feeling mourinho wanted the rag job and didn't get it and is now doing a half-hearted job for Chelsea so far. He has tried to piss of Chelsea's best player and best striker as well. I think he is waiting for Gollum's sacking and will jump on the rag job after that.


Well however you want to describe their performances they are title contenders at this moment in time - have you looked at the table recently?


So? The rags were awful last season but got results by sheer luck, refereeing decisions or Van Rapist's clinical finishing. Chelsea have won so many games by fluke this season. Against Aston Villa, Ivanovic scored but shouldn't have been on the field. Ramirez dived to get a point against West Brom. A Completely jammy victory because of a misunderstanding between Hart and Nasty. Another lucky one vs Sunderland. Getting a crucial goal against Cardiff which should have been chalked off. The table lies.


You do realise comparing them to the rags team of last season that won the league and then saying Chelsea have no chance cos they're like that very same team is just totally incongruous, right? If United got that much 'luck', however tangible a commodity that may be, then what's to say Mourinho won't too? Mourinho is a very fucking lucky manager.

Discounting Chelsea is very dangerous as they'll scrape and claw their way through games and 99% of the time JUST do enough to get the result they want.
twosips
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:58 am
Supporter of: mcfc

Re: typical mourinho

Postby Clowncrete » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:13 pm

twosips wrote:
Clowncrete wrote:
Spurge wrote:
Clowncrete wrote:[highlight]Chelsea have been dire so far. I thought they would be title contenders but they look very poor everytime I see them.[/highlight] They have got loads of results due to fluke goals or refereeing decisions. Many of their key goals have come from set-pieces as well, which is surprising.

I have a feeling mourinho wanted the rag job and didn't get it and is now doing a half-hearted job for Chelsea so far. He has tried to piss of Chelsea's best player and best striker as well. I think he is waiting for Gollum's sacking and will jump on the rag job after that.


Well however you want to describe their performances they are title contenders at this moment in time - have you looked at the table recently?


So? The rags were awful last season but got results by sheer luck, refereeing decisions or Van Rapist's clinical finishing. Chelsea have won so many games by fluke this season. Against Aston Villa, Ivanovic scored but shouldn't have been on the field. Ramirez dived to get a point against West Brom. A Completely jammy victory because of a misunderstanding between Hart and Nasty. Another lucky one vs Sunderland. Getting a crucial goal against Cardiff which should have been chalked off. The table lies.


You do realise comparing them to the rags team of last season that won the league and then saying Chelsea have no chance cos they're like that very same team is just totally incongruous, right? If United got that much 'luck', however tangible a commodity that may be, then what's to say Mourinho won't too? Mourinho is a very fucking lucky manager.

Discounting Chelsea is very dangerous as they'll scrape and claw their way through games and 99% of the time JUST do enough to get the result they want.


No there is still one difference between rags and Chelsea. Strikers. Rags had Van Persie to drag them out every time. Chelsea have no one like that.
Clowncrete
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 11:35 am
Location: Land of holy cows
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Super Kev!

Re: typical mourinho

Postby zuricity » Wed Dec 25, 2013 6:30 am

Clowncrete wrote:
No there is still one difference between rags and Chelsea. Strikers. Rags had Van Persie to drag them out every time. Chelsea have no one like that.


Not any more Rip van A*se is up to his old antics and injured.

Re Chelsea ... Outfoxed by Basel home and away , enough said. They are also rans. Big gob will fall on his sword there.
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18395
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Nigels Tackle and 109 guests