Wonderwall wrote:Mr Blatter is wading in with his thoughts on diving
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25586007
Roberto Martinez is also having his say
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25587737
patrickblue wrote:Both him and Martinez seem quite happy to damn gollum with their comments.
Blue Since 76 wrote:Twobob wrote:
Allways remember (in fact its the only thing I do remember of that period as I have had it removed for my sanity) is when Pearce lambasted Corradi for diving at the swamp. Corradi was wank though.
And Corradi got the hump with him for being named publicly and I don't recall one other manager backing Pearce on it. They all only have a problem with other teams doing it to them and it's about time something was done about it. It's virtually impossible for the referees to spot and can be managed after the event, even if it means someone lost on the day.
zabbadabbado wrote:I am starting to think the RAGS practice it in training.JIZZINYOUREYE always looks to come in side on the edge off the penalty area before diving at any type of contact.
dikdok wrote:Football is definitely a contact sport so the above problems will always be a matter of interpretation but what about grabbing? Are there any rules that say one player may not actually hold on to another part (cf Vinnie Jones) of another player. I am thinking particularly of grabbing at shirts in the penalty box during free kicks and corners.
Does anyone know?
Thanks.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:There would be massive controversy.There are plenty of cases where there is contact and the player goes down but doesn't have to. Januzi's "fall" was a classic case.There was enough there for it to be a foul but he made more of it than he needed to and that's the problem.Probably the majority of players overdo the fall to try to make sure the ref gives it.There is always a lot of disagreement as it is between the so called experts.
It would be fun to be on a panel that decides if it's a dive or not.
nottsblue wrote:
The grey area is this newish phenonomen of leaving a trailing leg to anticipate contact from defender, ie looking for a penner. Where the fuck did this come from by the way? Adam Johnson has done it for us in the past and i hate it. Almost as bad as the Tom Daley impersonators. This also needs to be stamped out but this is more difficult to police as a bloke running fast who is clipped will be put of balance and also sometimes players dive over to escape a clattering or injury and aren't looking for a penner.
BmoreBlue wrote:cannot for the life of me comprehend that ashley young has only been carded twice for diving since 2008. seems impossible.
BmoreBlue wrote:cannot for the life of me comprehend that ashley young has only been carded twice for diving since 2008. seems impossible.
Pretty Boy Lee wrote:
Therein lies the problem for me. We have a punishment in place for diving but don't bloody use it.
Watching the prem highlights last night I finally saw the 3 dives everyone talked at the swamp about and correct me if I'm wrong but none of them got booked.
Im_Spartacus wrote: I think that's a really important point you make and why no panel will ever sit to adjudicate dives or 'simulation'. Ex professionals as pundits talk about 'having the right to go down' under any contact, but nobody has ever defined exactly how that works, if contact constitutes a minor brush of leg against leg, how does that not translate to a penalty when a player is trying to wear the attacker's shirt. All part of the same problem to me in identifying transgressions inside the area.
Reality is that if you are fouled, you should fall down in a natural manner if indeed the contact is substantial enough to warrant hitting the deck. If you aren't fouled, you look like a cunt as you launch yourself into the air to do a triple salko in order to 'convince' the referee of the severity of the contact. Now for me, even if there has been a foul, this gymnastic shit of arched backs in midair, howls of agony, 5 rolls on the floor etc, are just as much simulation as a blatant dove, as it is simulating that the situation is worse than it actually was in order to influence the referees decision.
Richard Keyes was spot on this weekend, and several other times this season when he called out the ex-pros of Andy Gray and this week Alex McLeish for shying away from calling Welbeck and Januzaj cheats. He would never have had the balls to do it under sky, and particularly not against united, but clearly he has more freedom of expression in Qatar, which in itself shows half of the problem with British TV and punditry. The fact that Keyes is calling it out as cheating on a foreign tv station, whereas the ex-pros like to call it simulation or whatever, shows the cultural problem that has evolved amongst the British media and particularly ex-pros of facing up to the issue.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Pretty Boy Lee and 133 guests