Good ol Garry.

[JamieMCFC]

My ass no https://www.google.es/search?q=nike+at+ ... 2&ie=UTF-8 http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0505/080.html But as credible as the BS you are guilty of

Dumb fuck that's an article from 6 years ago. The only numbers that are ever made public are attendance and a fighters purse. Those are released by the state commission not the UFC and it depends on what state the card is held in. If the event is outside if the US that info is not released. But company value and buy rates are not public information and never will be.

[Rag_hater]

My ass no https://www.google.es/search?q=nike+at+ ... 2&ie=UTF-8 http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0505/080.html But as credible as the BS you are guilty of

Dumb fuck that's an article from 6 years ago. The only numbers that are ever made public are attendance and a fighters purse. Those are released by the state commission not the UFC and it depends on what state the card is held in. If the event is outside if the US that info is not released. But company value and buy rates are not public information and never will be.

It was not tthe point I was trying to make.
I was trying to explain to all you Mensa types that Nike was bigger than UFC,and moving from Nike to UFC was a step down.Not read anything that makes me think I am wrong.

Oh by the way what is this if there is fuckall info about Zuffa

http://www.zuffainvestoralerts.org/2013 ... t-shy.html

[Ted Hughes]

My ass no https://www.google.es/search?q=nike+at+ ... 2&ie=UTF-8 http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0505/080.html But as credible as the BS you are guilty of

Dumb fuck that's an article from 6 years ago. The only numbers that are ever made public are attendance and a fighters purse. Those are released by the state commission not the UFC and it depends on what state the card is held in. If the event is outside if the US that info is not released. But company value and buy rates are not public information and never will be.

It was not tthe point I was trying to make.
I was trying to explain to all you Mensa types that Nike was bigger than UFC,and moving from Nike to UFC was a step down.Not read anything that makes me think I am wrong.

Oh by the way what is this if there is fuckall info about Zuffa

http://www.zuffainvestoralerts.org/2013 ... t-shy.html

Statistically, what percentage of people who have contact with you, think you are an idiot ?

[Rag_hater]

My ass no https://www.google.es/search?q=nike+at+ ... 2&ie=UTF-8 http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0505/080.html But as credible as the BS you are guilty of

Dumb fuck that's an article from 6 years ago. The only numbers that are ever made public are attendance and a fighters purse. Those are released by the state commission not the UFC and it depends on what state the card is held in. If the event is outside if the US that info is not released. But company value and buy rates are not public information and never will be.

It was not tthe point I was trying to make.
I was trying to explain to all you Mensa types that Nike was bigger than UFC,and moving from Nike to UFC was a step down.Not read anything that makes me think I am wrong.

Oh by the way what is this if there is fuckall info about Zuffa

http://www.zuffainvestoralerts.org/2013 ... t-shy.html

Statistically, what percentage of people who have contact with you, think you are an idiot ?

I have not got the stats for it sure a genius like you could find them for me,and while you are at it could you find me some proof of UFC being bigger than Nike,some real proof not just bollox you and the geneii on here have dreamed up.

[Ted Hughes]

My ass no https://www.google.es/search?q=nike+at+ ... 2&ie=UTF-8 http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0505/080.html But as credible as the BS you are guilty of

Dumb fuck that's an article from 6 years ago. The only numbers that are ever made public are attendance and a fighters purse. Those are released by the state commission not the UFC and it depends on what state the card is held in. If the event is outside if the US that info is not released. But company value and buy rates are not public information and never will be.

It was not tthe point I was trying to make.
I was trying to explain to all you Mensa types that Nike was bigger than UFC,and moving from Nike to UFC was a step down.Not read anything that makes me think I am wrong.

Oh by the way what is this if there is fuckall info about Zuffa

http://www.zuffainvestoralerts.org/2013 ... t-shy.html

Statistically, what percentage of people who have contact with you, think you are an idiot ?

I have not got the stats for it sure a genius like you could find them for me,and while you are at it could you find me some proof of UFC being bigger than Nike,some real proof not just bollox you and the geneii on here have dreamed up.

I have no idea about UFC & am not interested.

I just found it interesting that yet another person, on yet another subject, thinks you are an idiot.

[Rag_hater]

I just found it interesting that yet another person, on yet another subject, thinks you are an idiot.

Well that's no secret.
You know what some say.
Simple pleasures for simple minds.

[BlueinBosnia]

I was trying to explain to all you Mensa types that Nike was bigger than UFC,and moving from Nike to UFC was a step down.Not read anything that makes me think I am wrong.

That's like saying moving from managing a programme stand at City to managing the club shop at, say, Leicester City is a step down, because we are a bigger club. He has gone from managing one (relatively tiny) portion of Nike's merchandising to managing a whole sporting franchise for half of the globe.

[Rag_hater]

I was trying to explain to all you Mensa types that Nike was bigger than UFC,and moving from Nike to UFC was a step down.Not read anything that makes me think I am wrong.

That's like saying moving from managing a programme stand at City to managing the club shop at, say, Leicester City is a step down, because we are a bigger club. He has gone from managing one (relatively tiny) portion of Nike's merchandising to managing a whole sporting franchise for half of the globe.

Fuck me and you lot are convinced I'm the stupid one,It's pretty obvious you lickers will swallow any BS,but I'm affraid I'm not that gullible.

[Alex Sapphire]

I always thought, and continued to say, that GC was so far out of his depth it wasn't funny.
Known in the trade for being OK but not at this level
I guess that means i'm in RH's gang now

[mcfc1632]

I have tended to to simply treat RH's posts with the respect they deserve, but I would suggest that there is clearly a trend (of course only IMO), in that he generally pops up in 'positive or pro-city' threads and carries on until his (IMO orchestated anti-CITY) straetgy derails \ stops the thread - job done.

Not really suggesting that we do witch hunts - doubt in the case of RH there is a need for him to be 'outed' - but a poll would be interesting asking:

Do you think that Rag_Hater's contribution to the board is:

a) that of a clear CITY fan bringing about helpful debate - even if some of it is 'thought provoking',

b) that of a total fuckwit - and proably a scum fucker on a WU mission - only interested in derailing positive threads about CITY or

c) not sure

In case it is not clear I would opt for 'B'

Of course as we all know the truth, I believe we should encourage him to stay around for comedy value - and just occaisionally remind people that take him seriously of the reality

[london blue 2]

B

[Rag_hater]

I have tended to to simply treat RH's posts with the respect they deserve, but I would suggest that there is clearly a trend (of course only IMO), in that he generally pops up in 'positive or pro-city' threads and carries on until his (IMO orchestated anti-CITY) straetgy derails \ stops the thread - job done.

Not really suggesting that we do witch hunts - doubt in the case of RH there is a need for him to be 'outed' - but a poll would be interesting asking:

Do you think that Rag_Hater's contribution to the board is:

a) that of a clear CITY fan bringing about helpful debate - even if some of it is 'thought provoking',

b) that of a total fuckwit - and proably a scum fucker on a WU mission - only interested in derailing positive threads about CITY or

c) not sure

In case it is not clear I would opt for 'B'

Of course as we all know the truth, I believe we should encourage him to stay around for comedy value - and just occaisionally remind people that take him seriously of the reality

No doubt after spending your life licking arses that having to form an opinion that is not allied to the other mongs must be pretty alien to you.
Anyway keep on licking seems to be the right level for you.

[City64]

DEFFO B

[zuricity]

I always thought, and continued to say, that GC was so far out of his depth it wasn't funny.
Known in the trade for being OK but not at this level
I guess that means i'm in RH's gang now

Gary Cook was indeed out of his depth. And i don't need RH or anyone else to convince me, i agree with you A.S.

[Wonderwall]

I wonder soriano and berigistain think of RH's theory?

[bigblue]

while you are at it could you find me some proof of UFC being bigger than Nike,some real proof not just bollox you and the geneii on here have dreamed up.

1. Cook was head of the Jordan brand, which is a sub-division of Nike.

2. Moving to a larger or smaller company has no correlation to whether you are getting a promotion/demotion. If you moved from being a high-level product manager at Microsoft ($312B market cap) to being an EVP at Splunk ($9B market cap), does that mean you got a demotion? Fuck no, the valuation of each company has nothing to do with it. It means that you are looking for a new opportunity that offers different challenges, different responsibilities, and a different working environment.

3. You are a fucking moron that keeps requesting facts that have nothing to do with the discussion. You have almost exactly the same arguing style as a creationist trying to make a case against evolution; keep bringing up irrelevant crap while covering your ears when people point out your bullshit.

[aaron bond]

while you are at it could you find me some proof of UFC being bigger than Nike,some real proof not just bollox you and the geneii on here have dreamed up.

1. Cook was head of the Jordan brand, which is a sub-division of Nike.

2. Moving to a larger or smaller company has no correlation to whether you are getting a promotion/demotion. If you moved from being a high-level product manager at Microsoft ($312B market cap) to being an EVP at Splunk ($9B market cap), does that mean you got a demotion? Fuck no, the valuation of each company has nothing to do with it. It means that you are looking for a new opportunity that offers different challenges, different responsibilities, and a different working environment.

3. You are a fucking moron that keeps requesting facts that have nothing to do with the discussion. You have almost exactly the same arguing style as a creationist trying to make a case against evolution; keep bringing up irrelevant crap while covering your ears when people point out your bullshit.

He still hasn't grasped your first point, so don't expect him to understand your second!

[Twobob]

I always thought, and continued to say, that GC was so far out of his depth it wasn't funny. Known in the trade for being OK but not at this level I guess that means i'm in RH's gang now

There are aspects of the job he fucked up on (Kaka comes to mind) but aspects if the job he did well (the Welcome to Manchester poster, his relationship with fans etc).

If you replaced your brain with that of a frog and mated with a silver-fish found under next doors front mat then, and only then, could you qualify for RH's 'gang'.

[GingeryBlue]

I always thought, and continued to say, that GC was so far out of his depth it wasn't funny.
Known in the trade for being OK but not at this level
I guess that means i'm in RH's gang now

Known in the trade for being ok?! Do you work in sport? I do and he's generally regarded as one of the sharpest, most revolutionary guys in the industry, at any level. He was INCREDIBLY sought after at Nike. Problem is over the next few years his gaffes mean established businesses will worry about hiring him but thereafter he'll either be working for us again, working for another huge brand or UFC will have taken over the world!

[Rag_hater]

while you are at it could you find me some proof of UFC being bigger than Nike,some real proof not just bollox you and the geneii on here have dreamed up.

1. Cook was head of the Jordan brand, which is a sub-division of Nike.

2. Moving to a larger or smaller company has no correlation to whether you are getting a promotion/demotion. If you moved from being a high-level product manager at Microsoft ($312B market cap) to being an EVP at Splunk ($9B market cap), does that mean you got a demotion? Fuck no, the valuation of each company has nothing to do with it. It means that you are looking for a new opportunity that offers different challenges, different responsibilities, and a different working environment.

3. You are a fucking moron that keeps requesting facts that have nothing to do with the discussion. You have almost exactly the same arguing style as a creationist trying to make a case against evolution; keep bringing up irrelevant crap while covering your ears when people point out your bullshit.

No doubt if you think going to Salford uni is the same as going to Oxford or Cambridge and there is no more prestige in going there then it's no wonder you rate UFC (moron).
And working for Jordon a sub division doesn't say anything (moron).
Oh by the way moron evolution has plenty of faults.