Pretty Boy Lee wrote:I think the amount of know it alls afte the fact is sad this time around.
Only formation I heard people clamoring for was 5 man midfield. We get that, get undone by a freak play and you all suddenly knew better.
Some right fucking moaning on here at times.
Dubciteh wrote:I thought the tactics were spot on and were exactly what i called for pre game(see match thread).
We tried going gung ho previously in europe against top sides and it never works.
We were shading the game up until the stupidity of Demi. The key was not to concede an early goal and grow into the game and thats exactly what was happening until the sending off. I fancied us right up until that moment.
Even at one down i thought the subs the count made just after the sending off were perfect.
The second goal was the killer but was a result of the sending off, kolorov had alves in his pocket in the 1st half, once silva went left wing we were always liable to leave space there and they exploited it, this coupled with clichys exhaustion was the reason for the second goal.
We will get there in the champions league i have full confidence on another night we would of won, its small margins.
Ted Hughes wrote: You didn't hear me asking for it & certainly not Kolarov, in a million fucking years.
Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Ted Hughes wrote: You didn't hear me asking for it & certainly not Kolarov, in a million fucking years.
I don't recall seeing who you asked for, I don't normally make it to the 8th paragraph tho so I might have missed it :)
You never know this defeat could prove to be the catalyst.You make a persuasive argument. I can kind of understand why he did it though. Which makes claims that we will only attackattackattack a bit daft. For me, in hindsight, of course I would have loved to see us press them all over and try and tear them a new arsehole as soon as we had possession. Maybe we're still not there psychologically, I know I didn't expect to win (not suggesting I may have psychokinetically affected the team, like, just in case). The pride they can take in the way we played and attacked with ten men ,will hopefully do wonders for our mentality. Not as if we can't afford to sit back all game away is it!?
Ted Hughes wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Ted Hughes wrote: You didn't hear me asking for it & certainly not Kolarov, in a million fucking years.
I don't recall seeing who you asked for, I don't normally make it to the 8th paragraph tho so I might have missed it :)
I didn't ask for anything. I believed Pellegrini when he said we will not change. Just assumed the choice would be whether he plays Jovetic, Dzeko or Nasri as the 2nd attacker. I would have gone for Jovetic as he is like an extra midfield player anyway & Nasri isn't fit.
If I thought we were going into systems to play v Barca, at home, not even one of them I came up with would involve Kolarov as a midfield player.
Dubciteh wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Ted Hughes wrote: You didn't hear me asking for it & certainly not Kolarov, in a million fucking years.
I don't recall seeing who you asked for, I don't normally make it to the 8th paragraph tho so I might have missed it :)
I didn't ask for anything. I believed Pellegrini when he said we will not change. Just assumed the choice would be whether he plays Jovetic, Dzeko or Nasri as the 2nd attacker. I would have gone for Jovetic as he is like an extra midfield player anyway & Nasri isn't fit.
If I thought we were going into systems to play v Barca, at home, not even one of them I came up with would involve Kolarov as a midfield player.
I actually wanted milner there all along but only realised yesterday he was suspended, with nasri not fit and jovetic/silva not great at tracking back, it made sense to me to play kolorov there to thwart one of there most dangerous weapons Dani Alves on the overlap and it worked the 1st half. Granted as you have said in other threads i didnt expect kolorov and the rest to forget how to pass and shit themselves but in theory before the match the tactic for kolorov was the best available. I would imagine once we had a stonghold in the game the plan was then in the second half to replace him with nasri or jovetic but the sending off killed this option.
Ted Hughes wrote:Dubciteh wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Ted Hughes wrote: You didn't hear me asking for it & certainly not Kolarov, in a million fucking years.
I don't recall seeing who you asked for, I don't normally make it to the 8th paragraph tho so I might have missed it :)
I didn't ask for anything. I believed Pellegrini when he said we will not change. Just assumed the choice would be whether he plays Jovetic, Dzeko or Nasri as the 2nd attacker. I would have gone for Jovetic as he is like an extra midfield player anyway & Nasri isn't fit.
If I thought we were going into systems to play v Barca, at home, not even one of them I came up with would involve Kolarov as a midfield player.
I actually wanted milner there all along but only realised yesterday he was suspended, with nasri not fit and jovetic/silva not great at tracking back, it made sense to me to play kolorov there to thwart one of there most dangerous weapons Dani Alves on the overlap and it worked the 1st half. Granted as you have said in other threads i didnt expect kolorov and the rest to forget how to pass and shit themselves but in theory before the match the tactic for kolorov was the best available. I would imagine once we had a stonghold in the game the plan was then in the second half to replace him with nasri or jovetic but the sending off killed this option.
That's all fair enough & sound tactically, but we have ruined our system in order to stop a fullback. What did Barca do different ?
That sends the message out to the whole team, that Barca are better than us & we went to pieces accordingly.
They had Masherano. How many headers did he have to win ? How many corners did we have ?
If we are admitting that we can't play football on equal terms v Barca, which Kolarov's selection says, then how about we have another plan of actually trying to beat them, by hitting them at their weak spots ?
We just stood in a line & got beat. Like Palace at Arsenal. Except Palace created more chances.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I was not surprised or disappointed that MP changed the set up a little for Barca but like Ted amazed and disappointed that the change involved Kolarov. Given how well Garcia played against Chelsea (plus his recent improvements in all games) I expected him to partner Fernandinho to allow Yaya to fully support our attacking play.
Kolarov probably did help down Barc's right side just by being a body there but his talent as a genuine midfield player is close to nil. No touch or control at all.At nil nil I was just hoping MP would make changes in the set up for the last 20 minutes or so but events changed all that.Even at 1 nil with 3 minutes to go I would have said we had a good chance away but 2 nil is probably too much.
bayblue wrote:I don't get all the doom and gloom around here.
Ted Hughes wrote: Well I'll give you where mine comes from. Imo, we have just been played off the park at football by a side which isn't better than us, because we were scared of them.
Dubciteh wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Ted Hughes wrote: You didn't hear me asking for it & certainly not Kolarov, in a million fucking years.
I don't recall seeing who you asked for, I don't normally make it to the 8th paragraph tho so I might have missed it :)
I didn't ask for anything. I believed Pellegrini when he said we will not change. Just assumed the choice would be whether he plays Jovetic, Dzeko or Nasri as the 2nd attacker. I would have gone for Jovetic as he is like an extra midfield player anyway & Nasri isn't fit.
If I thought we were going into systems to play v Barca, at home, not even one of them I came up with would involve Kolarov as a midfield player.
I actually wanted milner there all along but only realised yesterday he was suspended, with nasri not fit and jovetic/silva not great at tracking back, it made sense to me to play kolorov there to thwart one of there most dangerous weapons Dani Alves on the overlap and it worked the 1st half. Granted as you have said in other threads i didnt expect kolorov and the rest to forget how to pass and shit themselves but in theory before the match the tactic for kolorov was the best available. I would imagine once we had a stonghold in the game the plan was then in the second half to replace him with nasri or jovetic but the sending off killed this option.
Ted Hughes wrote:
That's all fair enough & sound tactically, but we have ruined our system in order to stop a fullback. What did Barca do different ?
That sends the message out to the whole team, that Barca are better than us & we went to pieces accordingly.
They had Masherano. How many headers did he have to win ? How many corners did we have ?
If we are admitting that we can't play football on equal terms v Barca, which Kolarov's selection says, then how about we have another plan of actually trying to beat them, by hitting them at their weak spots ?
We just stood in a line & got beat. Like Palace at Arsenal. Except Palace created more chances.
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:One thing really irked me last night in particular. Barcelona clearly aren't the best in the air, but whenever we got a free kick ten/15 yards inside their own half, rather than launch it into the box, we played it short and it just came to nothing. Also we get a corner in the 87th minute, bring our defenders up, the crowd gets excited and Silva hit's the first man. Why oh why does he take corners?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 104 guests