Bias on City-United match

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Bias on City-United match

Postby john@staustell » Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:40 am

Dear SKY

So once again the programme is massively overloaded against City.

Past-it Martin Tyler may as well be 15 when he says at 2-0 'but remember United are still in the CL' and 'United have won the title xx times'. The man was nearly crying when City scored after 40 seconds, mumbling something about City scoring. If the same had been done by his beloved United he'd have been screaming his head off. He just cant help himself with his bias. What IS he going to do as United plummet down the leagues? Retire him to save his sanity.

'Experts' - Gary Neville (United but sensible), Paul Scholes (Biased and inexperienced, United), Jamie Rednapp (Liverpool), Jamie Carragher (Liverpool), Graham Souness (Liverpool). Whilst Neville and Souness are objective, all of these would have wanted a United win.

Which brings us to the City-hating Niall Quinn, presumably put in to try and balance everybody else, at least on paper. This guy hates City these days as we are no longer a'homely' club or something ridiculous. Predicting a 1-1 draw should see him retired from punditry forever. What neutral in their right mind thought City wouldn't win.

Pure, unadulterated bias and I look forward to the day when SKY have proper competition so we can vote with our feet.

Yours sincerely

John @ St Austell
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20273
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Slim » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:09 am

Your middle name is @?
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Hazy2 » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:21 am

Slim wrote:Your middle name is @?


TW he likes to ignore.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9692
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby john@staustell » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:31 am

Slim wrote:Your middle name is @?


It's my thorn-in-the-side name in many places. Since they closed SKYTEXT it's my only way to get at them.

Wouldn't want to get confused with anyone else. :-)
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20273
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Bianchi on Ice » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:35 am

This is how it is.
We win and its because money has been spent
We lose and its how can they lose when all that money has been spent
Unlike liverpool who have god as manager and do everything organically, and scum who seemingly have a divine right to win all the time.
I could accept these views if they were actually based in reality, but they arent.
All i can do is not buy newspapers, click on links to their websites, pay for subscriptions to sky, bbc etc and take part in any form of monetary transaction to these said establishments.
They can change their tune if they like, but its too late
Its not about the fucking "price tag" sky...you cunts
Bianchi on Ice
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3973
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:28 pm
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: warren beatty

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Slim » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:38 am

Hazy2 wrote:
Slim wrote:Your middle name is @?


TW he likes to ignore.


And we LOL.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Im_Spartacus » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:39 am

john@staustell wrote:Dear SKY

So once again the programme is massively overloaded against City.

Past-it Martin Tyler may as well be 15 when he says at 2-0 'but remember United are still in the CL' and 'United have won the title xx times'. The man was nearly crying when City scored after 40 seconds, mumbling something about City scoring. If the same had been done by his beloved United he'd have been screaming his head off. He just cant help himself with his bias. What IS he going to do as United plummet down the leagues? Retire him to save his sanity.

'Experts' - Gary Neville (United but sensible), Paul Scholes (Biased and inexperienced, United), Jamie Rednapp (Liverpool), Jamie Carragher (Liverpool), Graham Souness (Liverpool). Whilst Neville and Souness are objective, all of these would have wanted a United win.

Which brings us to the City-hating Niall Quinn, presumably put in to try and balance everybody else, at least on paper. This guy hates City these days as we are no longer a'homely' club or something ridiculous. Predicting a 1-1 draw should see him retired from punditry forever. What neutral in their right mind thought City wouldn't win.

Pure, unadulterated bias and I look forward to the day when SKY have proper competition so we can vote with our feet.

Yours sincerely

John @ St Austell


I very much suspect sky will face a make or break battle with BT backed by BeIN Sports over the next deal, and that they will either lose, or pay so far over the odds it will cripple them.

But BT wouldn't be much different, the out of work pundits will just move from sky to BT
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9577
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi
Supporter of: .

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Michael Brookes » Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:43 am

Im_Spartacus wrote:
john@staustell wrote:Dear SKY

So once again the programme is massively overloaded against City.

Past-it Martin Tyler may as well be 15 when he says at 2-0 'but remember United are still in the CL' and 'United have won the title xx times'. The man was nearly crying when City scored after 40 seconds, mumbling something about City scoring. If the same had been done by his beloved United he'd have been screaming his head off. He just cant help himself with his bias. What IS he going to do as United plummet down the leagues? Retire him to save his sanity.

'Experts' - Gary Neville (United but sensible), Paul Scholes (Biased and inexperienced, United), Jamie Rednapp (Liverpool), Jamie Carragher (Liverpool), Graham Souness (Liverpool). Whilst Neville and Souness are objective, all of these would have wanted a United win.

Which brings us to the City-hating Niall Quinn, presumably put in to try and balance everybody else, at least on paper. This guy hates City these days as we are no longer a'homely' club or something ridiculous. Predicting a 1-1 draw should see him retired from punditry forever. What neutral in their right mind thought City wouldn't win.

Pure, unadulterated bias and I look forward to the day when SKY have proper competition so we can vote with our feet.

Yours sincerely

John @ St Austell


I very much suspect sky will face a make or break battle with BT backed by BeIN Sports over the next deal, and that they will either lose, or pay so far over the odds it will cripple them.

But BT wouldn't be much different, the out of work pundits will just move from sky to BT


very true, with all the streaming we've watched over the years across all the channels.. its essentially just a merry go round of the same pundits getting recycled across the different nations/networks. Well.. apart from the Aussies who seem to forgo "ex division 1 English footballer" and instead have what sounds like the 2 blokes sat on the couch in the fosters ads!
User avatar
Michael Brookes
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1837
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: bored at work
Supporter of: test
My favourite player is: test

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby roblues » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:20 pm

In Canada we had Jim Beglin, who delighted in observing that we weren't exactly inspired except for the opening ten minutes, that Hernandez could be just the spark that the scum needed to get them a goal, and in the 88th minute decided to talk for 30 seconds or so about the delightful goal that Ivanovic scored to "embarrass" us at the Etihad.
roblues
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:42 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON / Rochdale, UK
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Chinners » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:22 pm

I'm getting to the stage with commentators where I really don't give a flying one how bias they are. City are usually bias on the pitch winning games so feck em
Image
User avatar
Chinners
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Hampton Court Palace
Supporter of: B*ll*x
My favourite player is: Kun Tueart

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Dubciteh » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:24 pm

Chinners wrote:I'm getting to the stage with commentators where I really don't give a flying one how bias they are. City are usually bias on the pitch winning games so feck em


Me too, i prefer to spend my time admiring what i see not getting worked up about what the commentators are saying.
derby day the scores were level,
then the goat was fed by neville,
silly boy should know for sure,
feed the goat and he will score!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Dubciteh
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8628
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:49 am
Location: Dublin
Supporter of: CTID
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Nigels Tackle » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:43 pm

Chinners wrote:I'm getting to the stage with commentators where I really don't give a flying one how bias they are. City are usually bias on the pitch winning games so feck em


i actually like swearing at them
plenty of "fuck off tyler"'s in my house last night
ARMCHAIR FAN
Nigels Tackle
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18643
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: here, there, every fucking where
Supporter of: man love
My favourite player is: riyad meh!rez

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:47 pm

I thought Scholes was superb, but he is a Utd fan, as is Ne***e, Tyler is an 'old guard' fan, then we have several Liverpool.

Not one of them is 'on our side'. Most were honest, & were fulsome in their praise, but the fact that Sky don't even make the slightest effort to produce a balanced panel when City play ANYONE is basically disrespectful to the club.

They don't do this to anyone else, just City. Even top 8 clubs get their own man on there. We rarely do.

I have no problem with Scholes being on there, if he's sat next to Uwe Rosler.

I thought Scholes was brilliant. His comments about Arsenal were fucking hilarious & I don't think I've ever agreed with anyone more about anything, especially Jack Wilshire; honesty at last rather than lies & bullshit.

But he is a Utd fan who refers to them as 'we'. No way should he be on there without a City counterpart; that is just an insult.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby gmercer1 » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:55 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Scholes was superb, but he is a Utd fan, as is Ne***e, Tyler is an 'old guard' fan, then we have several Liverpool.

Not one of them is 'on our side'. Most were honest, & were fulsome in their praise, but the fact that Sky don't even make the slightest effort to produce a balanced panel when City play ANYONE is basically disrespectful to the club.

They don't do this to anyone else, just City. Even top 8 clubs get their own man on there. We rarely do.

I have no problem with Scholes being on there, if he's sat next to Uwe Rosler.

I thought Scholes was brilliant. His comments about Arsenal were fucking hilarious & I don't think I've ever agreed with anyone more about anything, especially Jack Wilshire; honesty at last rather than lies & bullshit.

But he is a Utd fan who refers to them as 'we'. No way should he be on there without a City counterpart; that is just an insult.

What did he say about Wiltshire Ted? I missed that last night
gmercer1
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:55 am
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Aguero

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:56 pm

gmercer1 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Scholes was superb, but he is a Utd fan, as is Ne***e, Tyler is an 'old guard' fan, then we have several Liverpool.

Not one of them is 'on our side'. Most were honest, & were fulsome in their praise, but the fact that Sky don't even make the slightest effort to produce a balanced panel when City play ANYONE is basically disrespectful to the club.

They don't do this to anyone else, just City. Even top 8 clubs get their own man on there. We rarely do.

I have no problem with Scholes being on there, if he's sat next to Uwe Rosler.

I thought Scholes was brilliant. His comments about Arsenal were fucking hilarious & I don't think I've ever agreed with anyone more about anything, especially Jack Wilshire; honesty at last rather than lies & bullshit.

But he is a Utd fan who refers to them as 'we'. No way should he be on there without a City counterpart; that is just an insult.

What did he say about Wiltshire Ted? I missed that last night


That he's no better now than he was when he was 17.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Bianchi on Ice » Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:59 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Scholes was superb, but he is a Utd fan, as is Ne***e, Tyler is an 'old guard' fan, then we have several Liverpool.

Not one of them is 'on our side'. Most were honest, & were fulsome in their praise, but the fact that Sky don't even make the slightest effort to produce a balanced panel when City play ANYONE is basically disrespectful to the club.

They don't do this to anyone else, just City. Even top 8 clubs get their own man on there. We rarely do.

I have no problem with Scholes being on there, if he's sat next to Uwe Rosler.

I thought Scholes was brilliant. His comments about Arsenal were fucking hilarious & I don't think I've ever agreed with anyone more about anything, especially Jack Wilshire; honesty at last rather than lies & bullshit.

But he is a Utd fan who refers to them as 'we'. No way should he be on there without a City counterpart; that is just an insult.


Thats the key word for me Ted..."disrespectful"
I think thats what they show the club on a regular basis....disrespect. Ok, we are biased because we support the club and it could be said its easy to rise above it all but as ive said earlier any praise for City is almost grudging. I dont see why it should be.
Bianchi on Ice
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3973
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:28 pm
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: warren beatty

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby gmercer1 » Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:01 pm

gmercer1 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Scholes was superb, but he is a Utd fan, as is Ne***e, Tyler is an 'old guard' fan, then we have several Liverpool.

Not one of them is 'on our side'. Most were honest, & were fulsome in their praise, but the fact that Sky don't even make the slightest effort to produce a balanced panel when City play ANYONE is basically disrespectful to the club.

They don't do this to anyone else, just City. Even top 8 clubs get their own man on there. We rarely do.

I have no problem with Scholes being on there, if he's sat next to Uwe Rosler.

I thought Scholes was brilliant. His comments about Arsenal were fucking hilarious & I don't think I've ever agreed with anyone more about anything, especially Jack Wilshire; honesty at last rather than lies & bullshit.

But he is a Utd fan who refers to them as 'we'. No way should he be on there without a City counterpart; that is just an insult.

What did he say about Wiltshire Ted? I missed that last night

Arrr right. Cheers.
gmercer1
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:55 am
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Aguero

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby Sideshow Bob » Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:06 pm

gmercer1 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Scholes was superb, but he is a Utd fan, as is Ne***e, Tyler is an 'old guard' fan, then we have several Liverpool.

Not one of them is 'on our side'. Most were honest, & were fulsome in their praise, but the fact that Sky don't even make the slightest effort to produce a balanced panel when City play ANYONE is basically disrespectful to the club.

They don't do this to anyone else, just City. Even top 8 clubs get their own man on there. We rarely do.

I have no problem with Scholes being on there, if he's sat next to Uwe Rosler.

I thought Scholes was brilliant. His comments about Arsenal were fucking hilarious & I don't think I've ever agreed with anyone more about anything, especially Jack Wilshire; honesty at last rather than lies & bullshit.

But he is a Utd fan who refers to them as 'we'. No way should he be on there without a City counterpart; that is just an insult.

What did he say about Wiltshire Ted? I missed that last night



Jack Wilshere hasn't improved at Arsenal since he was a 17-year-old, Paul Scholes said Tuesday.

Scholes was passing his judgement on Arsenal after their 2-2 draw against Swansea in his role as Sky Sports pundit, with his comments on the abilities of Wilshere likely to be the subject of much debate in the coming days.

Many observers have suggested that Arsenal's 22-year-old playmaker was the most gifted midfielder England have produced since Scholes was in his pomp for Manchester United and on the international stage, but the 11-time Premier League title winner begs to differ.

"When Jack Wilshere came on the scene, what a top young player he looked," suggested Scholes. "Injuries haven't helped him, but his development from 17 years of age, he doesn't look any better player now than he did when he was 17.

"He needs people like [Patrick] Vieira, characters like that, to take him on to the next level. Characters and leaders are important. You play Arsenal now, get stuck in about them and you've won the game."

The outspoken Scholes was equally forthright in condemning Arsenal manager Wenger and his team, in a week when they have lost 6-0 to Chelsea and saw their title hopes fade further with a 2-2 home draw against Swansea. "It's probably a typical week for Arsenal really," said Scholes. "They capitulated at Chelsea and it seems to be a similar theme that happens when they play the top teams. It happened at Liverpool, they conceded six at [Manchester] City and for one reason or another, players just seem to go missing.

"[Mikel] Arteta, [Santi] Cazorla, [Tomas] Rosicky, [Mesut] Ozil, it seems like they go on the pitch with no discipline. It's almost as if [the manager says] you four, five midfielders go out there and do what you want. Try and score us a goal, a few nice one-twos. Tippy-tappy football, don't bother running back. "I don’t know if it is what the manager does, but there is no discipline, there is no leader for them. There is no Patrick Vieira, no [Tony] Adams, no [Martin] Keown.

"If they go 2-0 down, they just carry on what they are doing. Ah I'll walk up front, lose the ball, play a nice little one-two and you wonder why they are in the position they are in.

"It’s Arsenal fans you feel sorry for. They seem to get the same thing every year. Maybe a little hint of the title for a few weeks and then they go to Chelsea, they go to City, they go to Liverpool and just do nothing.

"Fans expect Arsenal to be going for the league title and I know they are in third or fourth place or whatever, but they are a million miles away in my eyes.
Sideshow Bob
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7886
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:19 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Jonny Evans

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby South Stand Balti » Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:10 pm

I would nt mind them talking about money if it was truthful and without bias. For example, Mr Scholes could say "Do you realise Rio Ferdinand cost us more than City's back five cost in total."
South Stand Balti
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4005
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:25 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City FC
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: Bias on City-United match

Postby phips » Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:19 pm

i heard that Scholes was fantastic and slaughtered Arsenal and Fellaini
I'm not really a City fan. I'm just here for attention.

Barclays Premier League 2011-2012 CHAMP1-6NS
Barclays Premier League 2013-2014 CHAMP156NS
Barclays Premier League 2017-2018 CHAMP100NS
Barclays Premier League 2018-2019 CHAMP14ONS
Barclays Premier League 2020-2021 CHAM21ONS
Barclays Premier League 2021-2022 CHAM93ONS
Barclays Premier League 2022-2023 CHAM3XIONS
2022-2023 Domestic & European TR3BLE WINNERS
Barclays Premier League 2023-2024 CH4MPIONS
phips
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8335
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:04 pm
Location: California
Supporter of: Man City, Dortmund
My favourite player is: David Silva, Marco Reus


Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, CTID Hants, Mase, nottsblue, Paul G, stevefromdonny and 105 guests