Lev Bronstein wrote:The one of many that got me was Barclay's idea of foreign teams entering the FA Cup because Queens Park entered 140 years ago. "Why not Real Madrid?" How about because they have their own, spanish, cup to enter you stupid patronising chauvanist twat
Lev Bronstein wrote:The one of many that got me was Barclay's idea of foreign teams entering the FA Cup because Queens Park entered 140 years ago. "Why not Real Madrid?" How about because they have their own, spanish, cup to enter you stupid patronising chauvanist twat
Beefymcfc wrote:'Not a vintage year'?
The title was won twice last season, how can that not be a 'Vintage Year'?
Was there any real mention of us?
Original Dub wrote:Pathetic and so typical of the media bias.
Hopefully that fucking depressed moron that hasn't noticed the bias to date watches that.
AG7 wrote:@neilashton_:
On the @SundaySupp from 9:
1. City spending.
2. Harry/Lambert.
3. #saintsmarchon + Chelsea perfection.
4. Ginola.
5. Ravel + Arsenal.
City spending? I thought we only spent £25 that we are to get from Valencia for Negredo anyway ... what about those who have spent £150m already ad have a kitty of another £150, not to mention the debts they have ...
Chelsea Perfection? Dropping a 8 pts lead that is or the away form of late ... oh wait, one away win at a mid table club must have sorted all that in which they gifted them three of their five goals anyway ...
Wooders wrote:Lot of poisonous bile this morning - especial hatred for the lampard deal which they appear to think breaks ffp for some reason despite the fact we're paying his wages - odd
This Burt fella seems more switched on
gmercer1 wrote:When are they chatting about the rags being back after yesterday's amazing away win?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 91 guests