gmercer1 wrote:Im now starting to see how bad Fernando actually is. He offers us absolutely nothing
guv111 wrote:Prediction:
We will go in 0-2 or 0-3. rally like we always do when it's too late in Europe, and say how brave and committed we were late on, but still lose.
Dameerto wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Im now starting to see how bad Fernando actually is. He offers us absolutely nothing
He's not bad though - he's just bad in Pellegrini's system. IF we played three in central midfield he would be a perfect anchor but with just two he still hasn't found his balance between defending and holding the middle of the pitch for us - he's still way too defence-heavy. Given how Garcia improved after a full season and a bit with us I still haven't given up on Fernando, I just hope he finds the right balance soon and it all clicks for him.
iwasthere2012 wrote:They're like rabbits caught in the headlights at times. You'd swear they'd never met each other before tonight.
twosips wrote:"At least try"......Dixon. He may have a point.
twosips wrote:Dameerto wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Im now starting to see how bad Fernando actually is. He offers us absolutely nothing
He's not bad though - he's just bad in Pellegrini's system. IF we played three in central midfield he would be a perfect anchor but with just two he still hasn't found his balance between defending and holding the middle of the pitch for us - he's still way too defence-heavy. Given how Garcia improved after a full season and a bit with us I still haven't given up on Fernando, I just hope he finds the right balance soon and it all clicks for him.
By 'perfect' do you mean competent? I've not really seen much to suggest that he's that good an anchor. Matic for example clearly is.
twosips wrote:Dameerto wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Im now starting to see how bad Fernando actually is. He offers us absolutely nothing
He's not bad though - he's just bad in Pellegrini's system. IF we played three in central midfield he would be a perfect anchor but with just two he still hasn't found his balance between defending and holding the middle of the pitch for us - he's still way too defence-heavy. Given how Garcia improved after a full season and a bit with us I still haven't given up on Fernando, I just hope he finds the right balance soon and it all clicks for him.
By 'perfect' do you mean competent? I've not really seen much to suggest that he's that good an anchor. Matic for example clearly is.
Tesl wrote:I think people in here are actually being harsh. I think Barcelona have been brilliant, better by miles than any other opponent we have faced this season. We aren't suddenly terrible, we actually look quite dangerous going forward, but in the middle of the park and in attack they are just better than us.
Its easy now to blame Pelligrini, but the criticism last time was we didn't try to play our way and we changed our whole game because it was Barcelona. He's trying to set us up how we are normally strongest, but we are being beaten by the better team. I don't think its a fair criticism, we'd be losing with 5 in midfield but then he'd be blamed for changing our shape (as we know from last time).
People in here are way too reactionary with no attempt for rational thought.
Dameerto wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Im now starting to see how bad Fernando actually is. He offers us absolutely nothing
He's not bad though - he's just bad in Pellegrini's system. IF we played three in central midfield he would be a perfect anchor but with just two he still hasn't found his balance between defending and holding the middle of the pitch for us - he's still way too defence-heavy. Given how Garcia improved after a full season and a bit with us I still haven't given up on Fernando, I just hope he finds the right balance soon and it all clicks for him.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], stupot and 86 guests