Ted Hughes wrote:twosips wrote:Dameerto wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Im now starting to see how bad Fernando actually is. He offers us absolutely nothing
He's not bad though - he's just bad in Pellegrini's system. IF we played three in central midfield he would be a perfect anchor but with just two he still hasn't found his balance between defending and holding the middle of the pitch for us - he's still way too defence-heavy. Given how Garcia improved after a full season and a bit with us I still haven't given up on Fernando, I just hope he finds the right balance soon and it all clicks for him.
By 'perfect' do you mean competent? I've not really seen much to suggest that he's that good an anchor. Matic for example clearly is.
Matic would be nowhere in this.
Tesl wrote:I think people in here are actually being harsh. I think Barcelona have been brilliant, better by miles than any other opponent we have faced this season. We aren't suddenly terrible, we actually look quite dangerous going forward, but in the middle of the park and in attack they are just better than us.
Its easy now to blame Pelligrini, but the criticism last time was we didn't try to play our way and we changed our whole game because it was Barcelona. He's trying to set us up how we are normally strongest, but we are being beaten by the better team. I don't think its a fair criticism, we'd be losing with 5 in midfield but then he'd be blamed for changing our shape (as we know from last time).
People in here are way too reactionary with no attempt for rational thought.
Nick wrote:ONE SHOT ONE GOAL
3 SHOTS, 2 GOALS. ITS SAME SHIT
NEW THAT CUNT WOULD SCORE.
DOESNT TELL A FULL STORY COS WE STARTED OFF SO WELL UNTIL WE HAD TO DEFEND A SHOT ON TARGET... (I SAY IT EVERY GAME, FIRST CLEAN SHEET WAS COS NEWCASTLE HAS ONE SHOT AT HART).
How do we change it?
dinho on for dzeko? I just dont know. we need a runner.
navas too? dzeko isn't working with aguero for me.
we have 442 so have no ball but yet arent threatenin on the break. Bony? Dzeko isnt that player. hes HINDERING aguero for me by going wide
Tesl wrote:I think people in here are actually being harsh. I think Barcelona have been brilliant, better by miles than any other opponent we have faced this season. We aren't suddenly terrible, we actually look quite dangerous going forward, but in the middle of the park and in attack they are just better than us.
Its easy now to blame Pelligrini, but the criticism last time was we didn't try to play our way and we changed our whole game because it was Barcelona. He's trying to set us up how we are normally strongest, but we are being beaten by the better team. I don't think its a fair criticism, we'd be losing with 5 in midfield but then he'd be blamed for changing our shape (as we know from last time).
People in here are way too reactionary with no attempt for rational thought.
iwasthere2012 wrote:guv111 wrote:Prediction:
We will go in 0-2 or 0-3. rally like we always do when it's too late in Europe, and say how brave and committed we were late on, but still lose.
If Pellers doesn't change to 5 in the middle this could be more embarrassing than 3-0.
Trouble is he's wasting one substitution if not two just to rectify the situation. He fucked up big time with that selection.
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:The problem is Barcelona are just better.
Players like Clichy, Milner, Fernando just don't play for clubs gunning for this competition. You might get away with one if the rest are superstars but City's next level aren't exactly brilliant.
This stage is about par for this squad.
Tesl wrote:I think people in here are actually being harsh. I think Barcelona have been brilliant, better by miles than any other opponent we have faced this season. We aren't suddenly terrible, we actually look quite dangerous going forward, but in the middle of the park and in attack they are just better than us.
Its easy now to blame Pelligrini, but the criticism last time was we didn't try to play our way and we changed our whole game because it was Barcelona. He's trying to set us up how we are normally strongest, but we are being beaten by the better team. I don't think its a fair criticism, we'd be losing with 5 in midfield but then he'd be blamed for changing our shape (as we know from last time).
People in here are way too reactionary with no attempt for rational thought.
MilnersJaw wrote:I said before it started it was a write off with 442 and Fernando. Got to blame pellers, another clueless set up.
london blue 2 wrote:I don't get the Matic love. Fernando would look decent in Chelsea's line up. Our midfield doesn't suit him
foreverblue wrote:Tesl wrote:I think people in here are actually being harsh. I think Barcelona have been brilliant, better by miles than any other opponent we have faced this season. We aren't suddenly terrible, we actually look quite dangerous going forward, but in the middle of the park and in attack they are just better than us.
Its easy now to blame Pelligrini, but the criticism last time was we didn't try to play our way and we changed our whole game because it was Barcelona. He's trying to set us up how we are normally strongest, but we are being beaten by the better team. I don't think its a fair criticism, we'd be losing with 5 in midfield but then he'd be blamed for changing our shape (as we know from last time).
People in here are way too reactionary with no attempt for rational thought.
i get what you're saying but this is why we bought Bony isn't it?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, BlueinBosnia, carolina-blue, dick dastardley, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase and 173 guests