****Official : Man City v West Ham Thread****

[Justified logic]

Seems Sky Sports are going with the West Ham goal as their special moment. Why, oh why do we not the credit we deserve?

Time to tell the lad to cancel.

Frankly, anyone who subscribes to Murdoch's Sky is a mug. Harsh but true.

[kennyboy]

Great game.

Watching Agueros elbow, you can see he`s not hit Reid`s face. Reid is acting..
That can surely not be 3 games ban then..?

[Moonchesteri]

Seems Sky Sports are going with the West Ham goal as their special moment. Why, oh why do we not the credit we deserve?

Time to tell the lad to cancel.

Seriously?

We played so beautiful football and scored some lovely goals it's borderline criminal to not choose one of our great moves.

[Beefymcfc]

The new tagline from Quinn/sky this year for City:

"If you haven't seen the game, 3-1 doesn't do [west ham] justice"

Yeah it would have been 6 or 7 if we finished all our easy chances you prick

It's pathetic mate and an editorial choice.

Quinn plays the game and always pandered to the Rags who will be hating that.

And here we go, the Sergio incident.

[bigblue]

Quinn on Sergio:

"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"

If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt

[Cocacolajojo]

Quinn on Sergio:

"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"

If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt

Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.

[Beefymcfc]

Seems Sky Sports are going with the West Ham goal as their special moment. Why, oh why do we not the credit we deserve?

Time to tell the lad to cancel.

Seriously?

We played so beautiful football and scored some lovely goals it's borderline criminal to not choose one of our great moves.

The main effort is on how we lost control, the West Ham goal and now the Sergio incident. Yes, we lost it for 20 minutes but the negatives they spout no way outweigh the positives.

Fuck 'em though, they tried to kill Sterling's spirit but had to give him MotM.

Just smile.

[sheblue]

Sky doing their best to influence in favour of a ban.

[london blue 2]

Quinn on Sergio:

"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"

If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt

Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.

This is spot on.

It was naughty. Annoying that they're making a meal, and they did backtrack a bit. But Sergio deserves what he gets for it.

[london blue 2]

Also how did their left back stay on the pitch?

[Beefymcfc]

Quinn on Sergio:

"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"

If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt

Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.

This is spot on.

It was naughty. Annoying that they're making a meal, and they did backtrack a bit. But Sergio deserves what he gets for it.

It was naughty and I think it deserves a ban but it's the intent that the media has that fucks me off.

[CTID Hants]

The new tagline from Quinn/sky this year for City:

"If you haven't seen the game, 3-1 doesn't do [west ham] justice"

Yeah it would have been 6 or 7 if we finished all our easy chances you prick

Beefy you really need to jump ship mate, I watch all our games in HD on my TV courtesy of US or mainly Canadian channels with English commentary.

If I'm away I have a box I take with me too no geo blocking etc.

It's nice having agenda free coverage

[Beefymcfc]

The new tagline from Quinn/sky this year for City:

"If you haven't seen the game, 3-1 doesn't do [west ham] justice"

Yeah it would have been 6 or 7 if we finished all our easy chances you prick

Beefy you really need to jump ship mate, I watch all our games in HD on my TV courtesy of US or mainly Canadian channels with English commentary.

If I'm away I have a box I take with me too no geo blocking etc.

It's nice having agenda free coverage

I sacked it mate, and BT aswell but my lad (who looks after the house back home) has got them up and running again.

What do you use mate, I'm all for free coverage and sticking the V's up to the media cunts?

[ayrshireblue]

Going on about Aguero but completely ignoring the ref gave the West Ham left back a free ride after his booking and no mention of the shocking challenge on Caballero which could well have been a straight red card. If we were playing Bournemouth the next game they wouldn't be trying so hard to get Aguero banned but because it's the scum they're desperate to get him banned. And just wait till Mourinho starts spouting his vile garbage on the incident even though he doesn't talk about other clubs.

[Original Dub]

"Pep, are you worried that aguero will be banned for the derby"

"I don't know what you are talking about, I have to watch the tape"

"So you're not worried?"


What a cunt of a interviewer. Pep didn't look too impressed with him either.

[london blue 2]

The new tagline from Quinn/sky this year for City:

"If you haven't seen the game, 3-1 doesn't do [west ham] justice"

Yeah it would have been 6 or 7 if we finished all our easy chances you prick

Beefy you really need to jump ship mate, I watch all our games in HD on my TV courtesy of US or mainly Canadian channels with English commentary.

If I'm away I have a box I take with me too no geo blocking etc.

It's nice having agenda free coverage

What do you use?

[CTID Hants]

The new tagline from Quinn/sky this year for City:

"If you haven't seen the game, 3-1 doesn't do [west ham] justice"

Yeah it would have been 6 or 7 if we finished all our easy chances you prick

Beefy you really need to jump ship mate, I watch all our games in HD on my TV courtesy of US or mainly Canadian channels with English commentary.

If I'm away I have a box I take with me too no geo blocking etc.

It's nice having agenda free coverage

I sacked it mate, and BT aswell but my lad (who looks after the house back home) has got them up and running again.

What do you use mate, I'm all for free coverage and sticking the V's up to the media cunts?

go to off topic and find the thread card share alternative or pm your email address and I can expand further

[Spurge]

Quinn on Sergio:

"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"

If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt

Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.

I think it was a frustrating afternoon for Sergio a point illustrated by 'that incident' whether intentional or not only Sergio will know. Because of the new directives in clamping down on the perceived ugly side of the game I've no doubt the prem league officials will be rubbing their hands at the opportunity to use this as a means to underline their approach by banning him - a high profile player just before one of the biggest games of the season. On the plus we scored goals without Sergio scoring and should have seen others - kdb, Silva and nolito who should have also have netted. Lets not forget Iheanacho of course who will get the chance to showcase his attacking skills if Sergio is banned and is very capable.

That is of course unless pep plays nasri up front!

[london blue 2]

Class from Bilic. "I didn't see it in that way, we were going to make the change anyway..."

[Mikhail Chigorin]

Quinn on Sergio:

"There was definite INTENT to injure or hurt the player"

If I ever run into Quinn there will be definite intent to injure or hurt

Had it been against any of our players I would be fuming if it wasn't given. If Sergio plays in the derby we're a lucky team.

This is spot on.

It was naughty. Annoying that they're making a meal, and they did backtrack a bit. But Sergio deserves what he gets for it.

In the same way that Bogbrush always gets what he deserves for his misdemeanours.