Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

Using my "moderator priviledges" would be deleting your stupid post or any other post about me rather than the actual subject. But hey ho, have I ever done that?

mate, the subject was correctly identified as spurious bollocks in 1632's post.

and my post was about your hypocritical arguments, not you as a person - care to address it?

and whats the policy on mods obeying the rules round here?

3) Respect other board members

It was very valid question. It's quite clear, you STILL haven't either read or understood the response to your question. Which was answered in the topic even before you made it. I think it's quite slow to pose a question that has already been answered. Don't you think?

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

I have voted for Mancini, because he is the man in charge and he gets my full support.

I agree with this but I think this poll is one of the worst I can remember. Bad even for you NQDP .

Talking about poor form. Do you remember this comment by your good self during half time yesterday when everyone was already fuming? Quite relevant to this topic, I thought. In fact, even an inspiration.

Could it be poor team selection and tactics?

[saulman]

I'd have Mancini any day of the week and it's not because he's a better manager (which I think he is).....it's because I was sick to fuckin death of those Hughes haters not being able to see beyond his rag past. It had become clear that Lesley would have needed to do something spectacular to win over certain supporters and every mistake was analysed and spun to make him look like an inept rag bastard (with some justification at times).

Sometimes you have to take a little step back to move forward and so appointing Mancini when they did was the correct thing for the club to do. Not just for the sake of the team and results but for the sake of ALL of the fans.

At least now we can all get behind this fella........and nobody can deny, he is cool as fuck and his nose is in no way purple.

[mcfc1632]

NQDP - you are going to have to be less obvious if you are ever going to surpass baconface

On the other thread your positions were completely exposed as nonsense and everyone could see that

so what do you - divert attention - with this nonsense - read the thread - lots of people thnk so

...do you ever find it in you just admit when you are wrong

forget that - you do not have to admit it - people just respond because you not only fail to admit it you try and present yourself as right in the face of all common-sense - and the evidence of your own posts

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

NQDP - you are going to have to be less obvious if you are ever going to surpass baconface

On the other thread your positions were completely exposed as nonsense and everyone could see that

so what do you - divert attention - with this nonsense - read the thread - lots of people thnk so

...do you ever find it in you just admit when you are wrong

forget that - you do not have to admit it - people just respond because you not only fail to admit it you try and present yourself as right in the face of all common-sense - and the evidence of your own posts

I was wrong about what?

And it was YOU who took this to non-football matters, not me. Get off that high horse of yours.

[The Man In Blue]

as someone who has been labelled a "licker"by yourself and others i think have a perfectly good right to call you out over such blatantly hypocritical posts - maybe if you hadn't used such bare-faced double standards then refused to admit it you would not have multiple posters pulling you up for it.

go on, get the slow/i have already answered that response wheeled out.

[Alioune DVToure]

NQDP - you are going to have to be less obvious if you are ever going to surpass baconface

On the other thread your positions were completely exposed as nonsense and everyone could see that

so what do you - divert attention - with this nonsense - read the thread - lots of people thnk so

...do you ever find it in you just admit when you are wrong

forget that - you do not have to admit it - people just respond because you not only fail to admit it you try and present yourself as right in the face of all common-sense - and the evidence of your own posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4

[Grob]

I have voted for Mancini, because he is the man in charge and he gets my full support.

My thoughts too.

Silly silly silly thread

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

as someone who has been labelled a "licker"by yourself and others i think have a perfectly good right to call you out over such blatantly hypocritical posts - maybe if you hadn't used such bare-faced double standards then refused to admit it you would not have multiple posters pulling you up for it.

Again, what??

I expected Hughes to finish minimum of 5th and push for top four. I expect exactly the same for Mancini. If I didn't, that would be double standards. Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?

[mcfc1632]

I have voted for Mancini, because he is the man in charge and he gets my full support.

I agree with this but I think this poll is one of the worst I can remember. Bad even for you NQDP .

Talking about poor form. Do you remember this comment by your good self during half time yesterday when everyone was already fuming? Quite relevant to this topic, I thought. In fact, even an inspiration.

Could it be poor team selection and tactics?

I seem to remember a senior member of this site going to great lengths to explain how comments made in a matchday thread should not be then played back - not that DH's comment was wrong

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

I have voted for Mancini, because he is the man in charge and he gets my full support.

I agree with this but I think this poll is one of the worst I can remember. Bad even for you NQDP .

Talking about poor form. Do you remember this comment by your good self during half time yesterday when everyone was already fuming? Quite relevant to this topic, I thought. In fact, even an inspiration.

Could it be poor team selection and tactics?

I seem to remember a senior member of this site going to great lengths to explain how comments made in a matchday thread should not be then played back - not that DH's comment was wrong

You might've actually had a good point. But this was posted two hours a go.

"hence the lack of tactical countermeasures to change the game"

Is the other view of this that he hadn't a clue tactically what to do to change the game?

[mcfc1632]

NQDP - you are going to have to be less obvious if you are ever going to surpass baconface

On the other thread your positions were completely exposed as nonsense and everyone could see that

so what do you - divert attention - with this nonsense - read the thread - lots of people thnk so

...do you ever find it in you just admit when you are wrong

forget that - you do not have to admit it - people just respond because you not only fail to admit it you try and present yourself as right in the face of all common-sense - and the evidence of your own posts

I was wrong about what?

And it was YOU who took this to non-football matters, not me. Get off that high horse of yours.

Read the thread - I think you will see a majority that do not think that this is a worthy thread - read the previous thread you diverted from - I think that you will see a number of respected posters pointing out where you are wrong - look in a mirror and grow a pair

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

NQDP - you are going to have to be less obvious if you are ever going to surpass baconface

On the other thread your positions were completely exposed as nonsense and everyone could see that

so what do you - divert attention - with this nonsense - read the thread - lots of people thnk so

...do you ever find it in you just admit when you are wrong

forget that - you do not have to admit it - people just respond because you not only fail to admit it you try and present yourself as right in the face of all common-sense - and the evidence of your own posts

I was wrong about what?

And it was YOU who took this to non-football matters, not me. Get off that high horse of yours.

Read the thread - I think you will see a majority that do not think that this is a worthy thread - read the previous thread you diverted from - I think that you will see a number of respected posters pointing out where you are wrong - look in a mirror and grow a pair

The fact that almost 20% of posters would rather have Hughes in charge, for me makes this topic very worthy. And interesting in equal measure.

And again, what was it that I was wrong about?

[The Man In Blue]

Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?

mate your hyperbole is amazing - direct me to any quotes where people have been "screaming for a title challenge".
i really really really can't believe you cannot see what so many people are pointing out.

if someone said "expectations are too high" under hughes they were wrong - you say it under mancini and it's right.

no matter how you dress it up it is hypocrisy and it fucking stinks.

[Alex Sapphire]

And again, what was it that I was wrong about?

how long have you got.
Is it important to you never to be wrong BTW?

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?

mate your hyperbole is amazing - direct me to any quotes where people have been "screaming for a title challenge".
i really really really can't believe you cannot see what so many people are pointing out.

if someone said "expectations are too high" under hughes they were wrong - you say it under mancini and it's right.

no matter how you dress it up it is hypocrisy and it fucking stinks.

Just as for an example, Original Dub himself said that target for Hughes was top 6. He has later said that for Mancini it's top 4. That's just an example.

[mcfc1632]

I have voted for Mancini, because he is the man in charge and he gets my full support.

I agree with this but I think this poll is one of the worst I can remember. Bad even for you NQDP .

Talking about poor form. Do you remember this comment by your good self during half time yesterday when everyone was already fuming? Quite relevant to this topic, I thought. In fact, even an inspiration.

Could it be poor team selection and tactics?

I seem to remember a senior member of this site going to great lengths to explain how comments made in a matchday thread should not be then played back - not that DH's comment was wrong

You might've actually had a good point. But this was posted two hours a go.

"hence the lack of tactical countermeasures to change the game"

Is the other view of this that he hadn't a clue tactically what to do to change the game?

But the one you posted was from the match thread so your point is? - but another good attempt at diversion - anyway this is silly - the way you word your OP

"Seems to me that there are people there who aren't quite yet over Hughes sacking and feel we made the wrong decision."

Straight after your failed arguments on the other thread shows up what you were seeking to do - does not need me to show it - you do a good job yourself

[LookMumImOnMCF.net]

I wouldn't have either. I'd probably have some leggy blonde instead. It's good to see the majority have gone for the Italian stallion though, even I myself have been tempted by his ageing flowing locks. Hughes' face is all rubbery like. Roberto would have to keep the scarf on though.

[The Man In Blue]

Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?

mate your hyperbole is amazing - direct me to any quotes where people have been "screaming for a title challenge".

?

[ENIAM NAM]

Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?

mate your hyperbole is amazing - direct me to any quotes where people have been "screaming for a title challenge".
i really really really can't believe you cannot see what so many people are pointing out.

if someone said "expectations are too high" under hughes they were wrong - you say it under mancini and it's right.

no matter how you dress it up it is hypocrisy and it fucking stinks.

Just as for an example, Original Dub himself said that target for Hughes was top 6. He has later said that for Mancini it's top 4. That's just an example.

Would that at all be consistent with the club saying top 6 at the start of the season and then sacking him for not being on target for the top 4? And also Mancini stating that his official target is top 4?