Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Mancini Or Hughes

Mancini
91
81%
Hughes
22
19%
 
Total votes : 113

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:59 pm

LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:I wouldn't have either. I'd probably have some leggy blonde instead. It's good to see the majority have gone for the Italian stallion though, even I myself have been tempted by his ageing flowing locks. Hughes' face is all rubbery like. Roberto would have to keep the scarf on though.


Can't question Hughes' selection of suits though. That grey one he was wearing in couple of games was smashing. I've been looking for similar suit myself.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby ant london » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:01 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
mcfc1632 wrote:WOW - this must be the most self-centred - self-obsessed thread I have ever seen on this board

A number of well established members (and I most certainly do not mean myself) pull you up for blatant double standards and you use your mod privileges to start this spurious bollocks - presumably in some self-convincing belief that it will add strength to your failed position on the other thread

I will not vote because it does not have the option - or are you a genuine fan enough to just support the CITY manager because he is the CITY manager

Do you not have any mirrors in your house??

If so - take a hard look and stop diverting the board just to serve your need to sound oh so fucking wise - even when you have spouted bollocks


WHHHHAAATT??????

Not this bullshit again. What does "moderator priviledges" (and considering the amount of shit it often gets you, one might question what sort of priviledge it is in the forst place) have got to do with starting a poll?? Anyone with a legend status can start a poll. If it comforts you, I can tell you that I could start polls before I started helping out with running of this site.

Using my "moderator priviledges" would be deleting your stupid post or any other post about me rather than the actual subject. But hey ho, have I ever done that?


If you cannot see why some would believe you to be abusing your privileges (more as "Legend" than moderator) in the type of blatantly provocative polls/posts you can slap up then I really do have to wonder about your judgement.

I like you as a guy a lot mate but your posting on the subject of our manager (previous and present) beggars belief. I can't believe that you can actually be so myopic and incapable to see the blatant contradictions and hypocrisy in your expressed views when virtually every other single sane poster on here can see this and one after another repeatedly points it out to you.

Why you cannot or will not let this go and start being able to be viewed as a great poster again is beyond me. I can barely bring myself to read your output these days and that's a sad state of affairs.
Image
User avatar
ant london
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11505
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Almaty
Supporter of: Cityski
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:06 pm

ant london wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
mcfc1632 wrote:WOW - this must be the most self-centred - self-obsessed thread I have ever seen on this board

A number of well established members (and I most certainly do not mean myself) pull you up for blatant double standards and you use your mod privileges to start this spurious bollocks - presumably in some self-convincing belief that it will add strength to your failed position on the other thread

I will not vote because it does not have the option - or are you a genuine fan enough to just support the CITY manager because he is the CITY manager

Do you not have any mirrors in your house??

If so - take a hard look and stop diverting the board just to serve your need to sound oh so fucking wise - even when you have spouted bollocks


WHHHHAAATT??????

Not this bullshit again. What does "moderator priviledges" (and considering the amount of shit it often gets you, one might question what sort of priviledge it is in the forst place) have got to do with starting a poll?? Anyone with a legend status can start a poll. If it comforts you, I can tell you that I could start polls before I started helping out with running of this site.

Using my "moderator priviledges" would be deleting your stupid post or any other post about me rather than the actual subject. But hey ho, have I ever done that?


If you cannot see why some would believe you to be abusing your privileges (more as "Legend" than moderator) in the type of blatantly provocative polls/posts you can slap up then I really do have to wonder about your judgement.

I like you as a guy a lot mate but your posting on the subject of our manager (previous and present) beggars belief. I can't believe that you can actually be so myopic and incapable to see the blatant contradictions and hypocrisy in your expressed views when virtually every other single sane poster on here can see this and one after another repeatedly points it out to you.

Why you cannot or will not let this go and start being able to be viewed as a great poster again is beyond me. I can barely bring myself to read your output these days and that's a sad state of affairs.


Still, you had no objections for this poll

viewtopic.php?f=119&t=28819
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Alex Sapphire » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:06 pm

Image

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:you going to delete the "Is Mancini the Man" thread? or merge them?


What does that have to do with this topic?
Never criticise a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
That way when you do criticise him you'll be a mile away.
And you'll have his shoes.


Ἄνδρες γάρ πόλις, καί οὐ τείχη
User avatar
Alex Sapphire
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5758
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:02 am

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby The Man In Blue » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:11 pm

The Man In Blue wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?


mate your hyperbole is amazing - direct me to any quotes where people have been "screaming for a title challenge".


?



still waiting mate - i'd hate to think you make up spurious arguments to avoid the fact you have been caught out - please let it not be so!
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:13 pm

The Man In Blue wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?


mate your hyperbole is amazing - direct me to any quotes where people have been "screaming for a title challenge".


?



still waiting mate - i'd hate to think you make up spurious arguments to avoid the fact you have been caught out - please let it not be so!


You expect me to read whole topic for you? How about reading my reply to post that spurred you to "prove me wrong" or whatever.

Gloryhunter123 wrote:Why did we hire you then ?

What happend to we are going to win the league this season :) .
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby The Man In Blue » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:16 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:You expect me to read whole topic for you? How about reading my reply to post that spurred you to "prove me wrong" or whatever.

Gloryhunter123 wrote:Why did we hire you then ?

What happend to we are going to win the league this season :) .


jesus is that the best you can do? fucking laughable - how you equate someone repeating something mancini and a player - one he brought from Inter to be his rep on the pitch mind - both stated as people "screaming for a title challenge"? also note the smiley that post ends with.

i actually laughed at that response mate.
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Dunne's Half-Time Pint » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:18 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Or een more so, if someone who has said they'd be happy with 6th spot finish under Hughes would start screaming that Mancini should be mounting title challenge, that would be fucking MASSIVE double standards, right? RIGHT?


mate your hyperbole is amazing - direct me to any quotes where people have been "screaming for a title challenge".


?



still waiting mate - i'd hate to think you make up spurious arguments to avoid the fact you have been caught out - please let it not be so!


You expect me to read whole topic for you? How about reading my reply to post that spurred you to "prove me wrong" or whatever.

Gloryhunter123 wrote:Why did we hire you then ?

What happend to we are going to win the league this season :) .


Gloryhunter123? was that his 27th or 28th post? and does ":)" this denote anything?
All we are saying is give Doug a pass.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6683
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Leeds/Manchester

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:21 pm

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
still waiting mate - i'd hate to think you make up spurious arguments to avoid the fact you have been caught out - please let it not be so!


You expect me to read whole topic for you? How about reading my reply to post that spurred you to "prove me wrong" or whatever.

Gloryhunter123 wrote:Why did we hire you then ?

What happend to we are going to win the league this season :) .


Gloryhunter123? was that his 27th or 28th post? and does ":)" this denote anything?


I don't pay any attention to smileys or emoticons or whatever they are called. Also, I never reply text messages having them. And only emails having them I reply to are my mums, mainly because she types caps lock on and obviously has little or no understanding of how to use smileys anyway. Like "Hope everything is well with you two ;). Don't forget to eat :D.".
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby xavi6 » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:26 pm

Hughes signed some excellent players, brought us on a European adventure and got us to a cup semi final.

Mancini has won some games in his first few weeks.

Thread is pointless so early into Mancini's City career because there is very little to judge him as far as we're concerned.
Image

http://backpagefootball.com/ featuring our new PODCAST!!!

You can't spell 'Failure' without 'F.A.I.'
User avatar
xavi6
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:26 am
Location: Perth WA via Dublin
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Zab

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:27 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
ENIAM NAM wrote:I have voted for Mancini, because he is the man in charge and he gets my full support.


I agree with this but I think this poll is one of the worst I can remember. Bad even for you NQDP .


Talking about poor form. Do you remember this comment by your good self during half time yesterday when everyone was already fuming? Quite relevant to this topic, I thought. In fact, even an inspiration.

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Could it be poor team selection and tactics?


You have lost me Anti , please explain.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby DoomMerchant » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:28 pm

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
smurfsdabomb wrote:Mancini is the better manager for the long term but short term keeping Hughes was the right decision. Disrupting the management order halfway through a season is always a bad idea, I think Mancini will hit greater heights than Hughes but in terms of top 4 this season I think that was killed with the sacking of Hughes.


Sensible answer. I disagree that we lost the race for top 4 but I generally agree about sacking managers during the season. Upsets the balance and new manager has little time to instill his own ideas and get his own players in.

I do still prefer Mancini.


It's like watching a rubbish chess player.


more like fucking UNO.

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:29 pm

DoomMerchant wrote:
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
smurfsdabomb wrote:Mancini is the better manager for the long term but short term keeping Hughes was the right decision. Disrupting the management order halfway through a season is always a bad idea, I think Mancini will hit greater heights than Hughes but in terms of top 4 this season I think that was killed with the sacking of Hughes.


Sensible answer. I disagree that we lost the race for top 4 but I generally agree about sacking managers during the season. Upsets the balance and new manager has little time to instill his own ideas and get his own players in.

I do still prefer Mancini.


It's like watching a rubbish chess player.


more like fucking UNO.

cheers


I'm fucking boss at UNO. I'm giving you reverse card now.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby DoomMerchant » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:33 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
DoomMerchant wrote:
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
smurfsdabomb wrote:Mancini is the better manager for the long term but short term keeping Hughes was the right decision. Disrupting the management order halfway through a season is always a bad idea, I think Mancini will hit greater heights than Hughes but in terms of top 4 this season I think that was killed with the sacking of Hughes.


Sensible answer. I disagree that we lost the race for top 4 but I generally agree about sacking managers during the season. Upsets the balance and new manager has little time to instill his own ideas and get his own players in.

I do still prefer Mancini.


It's like watching a rubbish chess player.


more like fucking UNO.

cheers


I'm fucking boss at UNO. I'm giving you reverse card now.


maybe the best post in this thread. nice.

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby mcfc1632 » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:34 pm

ant london wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
mcfc1632 wrote:WOW - this must be the most self-centred - self-obsessed thread I have ever seen on this board

A number of well established members (and I most certainly do not mean myself) pull you up for blatant double standards and you use your mod privileges to start this spurious bollocks - presumably in some self-convincing belief that it will add strength to your failed position on the other thread

I will not vote because it does not have the option - or are you a genuine fan enough to just support the CITY manager because he is the CITY manager

Do you not have any mirrors in your house??

If so - take a hard look and stop diverting the board just to serve your need to sound oh so fucking wise - even when you have spouted bollocks


WHHHHAAATT??????

Not this bullshit again. What does "moderator priviledges" (and considering the amount of shit it often gets you, one might question what sort of priviledge it is in the forst place) have got to do with starting a poll?? Anyone with a legend status can start a poll. If it comforts you, I can tell you that I could start polls before I started helping out with running of this site.

Using my "moderator priviledges" would be deleting your stupid post or any other post about me rather than the actual subject. But hey ho, have I ever done that?


If you cannot see why some would believe you to be abusing your privileges (more as "Legend" than moderator) in the type of blatantly provocative polls/posts you can slap up then I really do have to wonder about your judgement.

I like you as a guy a lot mate but your posting on the subject of our manager (previous and present) beggars belief. I can't believe that you can actually be so myopic and incapable to see the blatant contradictions and hypocrisy in your expressed views when virtually every other single sane poster on here can see this and one after another repeatedly points it out to you.

Why you cannot or will not let this go and start being able to be viewed as a great poster again is beyond me. I can barely bring myself to read your output these days and that's a sad state of affairs.



You see NQDP - another respected poster - are they all wrong?

Ant - because of a number well-established posters, such as yourself, put forward comments that keep referring to this previous massive contribution I extend the same respect

But if you had been a joiner since Dec 08 - like me - all you would have seen is a plethora of posts - generally with a common theme - that just come out as arrogant and cock-sure - you would not relate them to a board legend - more from a seemingly insecure personality that seems to have a need to reassure themselves that they are 'all-wise' and 'never-wrong' and lack the pair to ever concede anything

I just thought with the change of manager all that would change - but.....
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:38 pm

IM ENJOYING THIS.

NQDP - IT,S LIKE THE FUCKING ALAMO AND YOUR DOING ADMIRABLY.

I HAVE MY CUP OF TEA NOW - CARRY ON.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32279
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:39 pm

mcfc1632 wrote:
ant london wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
mcfc1632 wrote:WOW - this must be the most self-centred - self-obsessed thread I have ever seen on this board

A number of well established members (and I most certainly do not mean myself) pull you up for blatant double standards and you use your mod privileges to start this spurious bollocks - presumably in some self-convincing belief that it will add strength to your failed position on the other thread

I will not vote because it does not have the option - or are you a genuine fan enough to just support the CITY manager because he is the CITY manager

Do you not have any mirrors in your house??

If so - take a hard look and stop diverting the board just to serve your need to sound oh so fucking wise - even when you have spouted bollocks


WHHHHAAATT??????

Not this bullshit again. What does "moderator priviledges" (and considering the amount of shit it often gets you, one might question what sort of priviledge it is in the forst place) have got to do with starting a poll?? Anyone with a legend status can start a poll. If it comforts you, I can tell you that I could start polls before I started helping out with running of this site.

Using my "moderator priviledges" would be deleting your stupid post or any other post about me rather than the actual subject. But hey ho, have I ever done that?


If you cannot see why some would believe you to be abusing your privileges (more as "Legend" than moderator) in the type of blatantly provocative polls/posts you can slap up then I really do have to wonder about your judgement.

I like you as a guy a lot mate but your posting on the subject of our manager (previous and present) beggars belief. I can't believe that you can actually be so myopic and incapable to see the blatant contradictions and hypocrisy in your expressed views when virtually every other single sane poster on here can see this and one after another repeatedly points it out to you.

Why you cannot or will not let this go and start being able to be viewed as a great poster again is beyond me. I can barely bring myself to read your output these days and that's a sad state of affairs.



You see NQDP - another respected poster - are they all wrong?

Ant - because of a number well-established posters, such as yourself, put forward comments that keep referring to this previous massive contribution I extend the same respect

But if you had been a joiner since Dec 08 - like me - all you would have seen is a plethora of posts - generally with a common theme - that just come out as arrogant and cock-sure - you would not relate them to a board legend - more from a seemingly insecure personality that seems to have a need to reassure themselves that they are 'all-wise' and 'never-wrong' and lack the pair to ever concede anything

I just thought with the change of manager all that would change - but.....


I repeat, this topic has fuck all to do about me, despite what you seem to think and everything to do with who people would've liked in charge in this moment in time. You seem to want this to be about me though. You can go to off topic and start "NQDP" topic (topics about individual posters arent encouraged but I will promise I will not use my "moderator priviledges" to lock it). Let's keep this about managers, shall we.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:42 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:IM ENJOYING THIS.

NQDP - IT,S LIKE THE FUCKING ALAMO AND YOUR DOING ADMIRABLY.

I HAVE MY CUP OF TEA NOW - CARRY ON.


I don't think this is even bad. I've been in worse situations.

Have to go to grocery soon and then make my world famous Trumpet Chanterelle pasta. I'll be back later on though.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby Dunne's Half-Time Pint » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:43 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:IM ENJOYING THIS.

NQDP - IT,S LIKE THE FUCKING ALAMO AND YOUR DOING ADMIRABLY.

I HAVE MY CUP OF TEA NOW - CARRY ON.


NQDP is the sort of guy who cheats at paintballing - if you don't admit to being hit what's the point in the game?
All we are saying is give Doug a pass.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6683
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Leeds/Manchester

Re: Mancini Or Hughes, Which One Would You Have

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:44 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:IM ENJOYING THIS.

NQDP - IT,S LIKE THE FUCKING ALAMO AND YOUR DOING ADMIRABLY.

I HAVE MY CUP OF TEA NOW - CARRY ON.


I don't think this is even bad. I've been in worse situations.

Have to go to grocery soon and then make my world famous Trumpet Chanterelle pasta. I'll be back later on though.


NOT HAPPY ABOUT THE BROCERY ISSUE...IVE JUST WOKEN UP AND WAS ENJOYING THE BATTLE.

HURRY UP THEN.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32279
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, city72, Scatman, stupot and 198 guests