ant london wrote:Fabulous post Ted
I love it when you find yourself nodding to every point made....yep....uh huh....exactly...fucking spot on. Rant-tastic and every single word chimes with me.
Take a bow Hughes (Ted)
DoomMerchant wrote:jesus h christ...now it's spinning out of control the other direction. Mancini loses one match and the *supposed* lickers crawl out of the woodwork to defend their jedi master. i was convinced Hughes was on the right path for a long time, and then he seemed to lose his way and his job, fairly or unfairly -- a little of both for me, but i wasn't aggrieved with his sacking like some in this thread obv were. Mancini will be judged on the same basis i believe. if i had to choose i'd rather have Mancini now, but until we see how he forms up over the next 2 months he will face some of the same criticism Hughes faced. Fairly or unfairly.
i didn't see too many people saying positive things about Mancini's tactics in the match thread yesteday...but it's just one match.
cheers
carl_feedthegoat wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:jesus h christ...now it's spinning out of control the other direction. Mancini loses one match and the *supposed* lickers crawl out of the woodwork to defend their jedi master. i was convinced Hughes was on the right path for a long time, and then he seemed to lose his way and his job, fairly or unfairly -- a little of both for me, but i wasn't aggrieved with his sacking like some in this thread obv were. Mancini will be judged on the same basis i believe. if i had to choose i'd rather have Mancini now, but until we see how he forms up over the next 2 months he will face some of the same criticism Hughes faced. Fairly or unfairly.
i didn't see too many people saying positive things about Mancini's tactics in the match thread yesteday...but it's just one match.
cheers
FUCKING HILARIOUS ISNT IT...........
Bluez wrote:I suppose the fairest way to determine how they are getting on would be to compare what did each of them do with the same squad? Mancini has pretty much added nor one, nor has anyone been sold.
Made even more interesting by teh fact that Manchinis first 4 games were fairly easy and included a cup game against lower league opposition and his 5th game was the first real test.
Also Hughes first 4 games were fairly easy and included a cup game against lower league opposition and his 5th game was the first real test.
In Hughes 1st 5 games he kept 4 clean sheets and the in the stiff game against Arsenal, we hammered them (the 4-2 score line flattered them)
In Manchinis 1st 5 games he kept 3 clean sheets and in the first stiff test against a team who were 4 points off the relegation zone we got hammered, completely played off the park.
So as I am behind Manchini as he is now our manager, I guess my point is after 5 games, this is a really stupid thread. Manchini still has to prove himself in te English league.
That said full points for Ted's post, although those it was directed towards won't even realise just how hypocritical they are.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:TED.
I DONT REALLY LIKE TO SEE EVERYONE PAINTED WITH THE SAME BRUSH...AND YOUR POST DOES EXACTLY THAT, THERE WERE SOME GOOD POINTS THAT YOU RAISED BUT THERE WAS ALSO SOME UNNECESARY COMMENTS... "though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types" ALSO "How it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off "....INSTEAD OF USING THE TERM "PEOPLE" OR "THEY" WHEN YOU ARE SLAGGING THEM OFF CAN YOU PLEASE MENTION THEM BY NAME AND THAT WAY THERE WOULD BE NO NEED TO GUESS WHO YOUR TALKING ABOUT AND THEY CAN GO ABOUT DEFENDING THEIR STANCE?
I HAVE BROUGHT THIS UP BEFORE ABOUT VEILED ATTEMPTS AT SLAGGING PEOPLE OFF WITHOUT ACTUALLY NAMING THEM.......I DONT LIKE IT AND WOULD PREFER A SPADE TO BE CALLED A SPADE.
THANKS.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE.
ant london wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE.
Mate, if the rest of us are perfectly aware (/have a pretty bloody good idea) of the people referred to in Ted's post I'm pretty sure it's not beyond you to put 2 and 2 together?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:ant london wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE.
Mate, if the rest of us are perfectly aware (/have a pretty bloody good idea) of the people referred to in Ted's post I'm pretty sure it's not beyond you to put 2 and 2 together?
WE HAVE BEEN DOWN THIS ROAD BEFORE ANT AND MY STANCE STILL STANDS..........I JUST PREFER WHEN HAVING A DIG AT FANS IT,S PERFECTLY REASONABLE TO POINT THEM OUT BY NAME.
ant london wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:ant london wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE.
Mate, if the rest of us are perfectly aware (/have a pretty bloody good idea) of the people referred to in Ted's post I'm pretty sure it's not beyond you to put 2 and 2 together?
WE HAVE BEEN DOWN THIS ROAD BEFORE ANT AND MY STANCE STILL STANDS..........I JUST PREFER WHEN HAVING A DIG AT FANS IT,S PERFECTLY REASONABLE TO POINT THEM OUT BY NAME.
Yeah I know you like it like that mate. I'm sure that Ted will be more than happy to oblige.
Don't personally think it makes any odds when it's so obvious but I'm happy to adhere to your naming and shaming approach as evidenced earlier
The Man In Blue wrote:DoomMerchant is a total cunt.
hows that? brevity i know, but i'm sure i could embellish with some slander and questioning of your sexual preference if you like.
DoomMerchant wrote:jesus h christ...now it's spinning out of control the other direction. Mancini loses one match and the *supposed* lickers crawl out of the woodwork to defend their jedi master. i was convinced Hughes was on the right path for a long time, and then he seemed to lose his way and his job, fairly or unfairly -- a little of both for me, but i wasn't aggrieved with his sacking like some in this thread obv were. Mancini will be judged on the same basis i believe. if i had to choose i'd rather have Mancini now, but until we see how he forms up over the next 2 months he will face some of the same criticism Hughes faced. Fairly or unfairly.
i didn't see too many people saying positive things about Mancini's tactics in the match thread yesteday...but it's just one match.
cheers
Wonderwall wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I voted for Hughes, not because I know he's better than Mancini (that's impossible to know even though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types can tell me for sure that Mancini's better) but because I was perfectly happy with how he was building the team, thought most of his signings were excellent, his work behind the scenes was excellent & we played all out attacking football that most of the two faced twats on here were begging for (until it happened & then it became 'tactically naive')
Now it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off rationalising how it's perfectly acceptable to play Benjani instead of Robinho, signing a 33 year old injury prone defensive midfield player is a good move, Playing Petrov on the right (something Hughes was called a cluelass cunt for doing for 10 minutes) is ok & to top it all TO FUCKING TOP IT ALL...THE PEOPLE WHO SAID HUGHES COULDN'T GET THE BEST OUT OF ROBINHO ARE NOW TURNING ON ROBINHO BECAUSE HE'S BEEN EVEN FUCKING WORSE UNDER MANCINI!!!! I have no problem with any of the things Mancini has done but lots of people on here would be going fucking spare if Hughes had done the same.
People who slaughtered Hughes for playing Ched Evans & Caicedo claiming Mancini's somehow better at giving young players a chance for playing a couple of kids in the FA Cup when we had 10 fucking players missing!! Now he's talking about loaning out Weiss, NOT A FUCKING MURMOUR! I have no problem with his actions there but you fuckers should.
Hughes has gone, don't care anymore, I'm now 100% behind Mancini & think/ hope he can continue & improve on the great work Hughes did, perhaps spot some things Hughes didn't but make no mistake, Hughes sacking is, apart from Ranieri's, probably the most unfair, ever in the history of football in this country. Let's hope Mancini can add a couple of players & have the success that Mourinho did with Ranieri's team. Onwards & upwards & I'll stand side by side with you hypocritical cunts.
now that is a quality post!
Bluez wrote:I suppose the fairest way to determine how they are getting on would be to compare what did each of them do with the same squad? Mancini has pretty much added nor one, nor has anyone been sold.
Made even more interesting by teh fact that Manchinis first 4 games were fairly easy and included a cup game against lower league opposition and his 5th game was the first real test.
Also Hughes first 4 games were fairly easy and included a cup game against lower league opposition and his 5th game was the first real test.
In Hughes 1st 5 games he kept 4 clean sheets and the in the stiff game against Arsenal, we hammered them (the 4-2 score line flattered them)
In Mancini's 1st 5 games he kept 3 clean sheets and in the first stiff test against a team who were 4 points off the relegation zone we got hammered, completely played off the park.
So as I am behind Manchini as he is now our manager, I guess my point is after 5 games, this is a really stupid thread. Manchini still has to prove himself in te English league.
That said full points for Ted's post, although those it was directed towards won't even realise just how hypocritical they are.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:TED.
I DONT REALLY LIKE TO SEE EVERYONE PAINTED WITH THE SAME BRUSH...AND YOUR POST DOES EXACTLY THAT, THERE WERE SOME GOOD POINTS THAT YOU RAISED BUT THERE WAS ALSO SOME UNNECESARY COMMENTS... "though various knowitall wanker football fucking genius types" ALSO "How it's fucking laughable reading posts from the same titheads that slagged Hughes off "....INSTEAD OF USING THE TERM "PEOPLE" OR "THEY" WHEN YOU ARE SLAGGING THEM OFF CAN YOU PLEASE MENTION THEM BY NAME AND THAT WAY THERE WOULD BE NO NEED TO GUESS WHO YOUR TALKING ABOUT AND THEY CAN GO ABOUT DEFENDING THEIR STANCE?
I HAVE BROUGHT THIS UP BEFORE ABOUT VEILED ATTEMPTS AT SLAGGING PEOPLE OFF WITHOUT ACTUALLY NAMING THEM.......I DONT LIKE IT AND WOULD PREFER A SPADE TO BE CALLED A SPADE.
THANKS.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, Blue In Bolton, CTID Hants, Mase, Nigels Tackle, PeterParker, salford city, sheblue and 203 guests