Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Can someone please help me out here.
What specifically did he do wrong today? or what didn't he do right?
Genuine questions.
Anyone?
he didn't hug the opposition or chew gum like an animal.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Can someone please help me out here.
What specifically did he do wrong today? or what didn't he do right?
Genuine questions.
Anyone?
Sideshow Bob wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Can someone please help me out here.
What specifically did he do wrong today? or what didn't he do right?
Genuine questions.
Anyone?
he didn't hug the opposition or chew gum like an animal.
Sister of fu wrote:I think we are quite unsettled as a defensive unit and have been all season and this is not helping Bravo settle. I think there is added pressure on him as he has replaced a legend at city and I think he is getting a raw deal from quite a lot of fans because of this. I heard some ridiculous comments after Boro scored that he was at fault, utter nonsense. Some people will never ever give him a chance but he will have to live with that.
IMO if the back four becomes more settled so will he. The goal on Saturday comes from a Zabba error, Bravo will probably say himself he could maybe have done better but the blame IMO goes to Zabba for being weak as piss.
We urgently need a settled back line. Five clean sheets in fourteen is shocking but don't let people fool you and says it's all down to Bravo. It's a collective. Joe Hart would not be keeping clean sheets in this team.
BlueinBosnia wrote:Sister of fu wrote:I think we are quite unsettled as a defensive unit and have been all season and this is not helping Bravo settle. I think there is added pressure on him as he has replaced a legend at city and I think he is getting a raw deal from quite a lot of fans because of this. I heard some ridiculous comments after Boro scored that he was at fault, utter nonsense. Some people will never ever give him a chance but he will have to live with that.
IMO if the back four becomes more settled so will he. The goal on Saturday comes from a Zabba error, Bravo will probably say himself he could maybe have done better but the blame IMO goes to Zabba for being weak as piss.
We urgently need a settled back line. Five clean sheets in fourteen is shocking but don't let people fool you and says it's all down to Bravo. It's a collective. Joe Hart would not be keeping clean sheets in this team.
Stop avoiding the elephant in the room - Could you take Joe Corrigan in a fight?
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:Clean sheets aren't the be all and end all of football.
Yeah well, defending is the other 50% of football.
Socrates wrote:Good City keepers have proper blokes names like Joe, Bert, Frank and Joe. Not Claudio. It's a poncy name. Hope that helps.
More seriously. A clown that can pass a bit may not be the answer beyond this season.
iwasthere2012 wrote:Socrates wrote:Good City keepers have proper blokes names like Joe, Bert, Frank and Joe. Not Claudio. It's a poncy name. Hope that helps.
More seriously. A clown that can pass a bit may not be the answer beyond this season.
How about Geronimo.
Spurge wrote:Solid performance and some decent saves when called upon from bravo today.
Spurge wrote:Solid performance and some decent saves when called upon from bravo today.
City64 wrote:SKY SPORTS this morning starting the build up to Saturdays game with Chelsea , they have shown this seasons stats so far comparing Bravo and Chelsea Keeper Courtois .......... for all the knockers out there Bravo,s stats are better than Courtois and Chelsea are top of the league !
I am a fan of Bravo but was amazed at said stats , it just shows what a good keeper he is even with a defence in front of him that is still learning a system and finding its feet .
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:City64 wrote:SKY SPORTS this morning starting the build up to Saturdays game with Chelsea , they have shown this seasons stats so far comparing Bravo and Chelsea Keeper Courtois .......... for all the knockers out there Bravo,s stats are better than Courtois and Chelsea are top of the league !
I am a fan of Bravo but was amazed at said stats , it just shows what a good keeper he is even with a defence in front of him that is still learning a system and finding its feet .
Some sarcastic souls might think you're being a bit generous there No.64.
Elevating our back players to the status of being "a defence" might suggest a degree of organisation.
(just joking![]()
)
Socrates wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:City64 wrote:SKY SPORTS this morning starting the build up to Saturdays game with Chelsea , they have shown this seasons stats so far comparing Bravo and Chelsea Keeper Courtois .......... for all the knockers out there Bravo,s stats are better than Courtois and Chelsea are top of the league !
I am a fan of Bravo but was amazed at said stats , it just shows what a good keeper he is even with a defence in front of him that is still learning a system and finding its feet .
Some sarcastic souls might think you're being a bit generous there No.64.
Elevating our back players to the status of being "a defence" might suggest a degree of organisation.
(just joking![]()
)
I've recently taken to referring to it as our "back line" if that helps at all?
aaron bond wrote:Socrates wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:City64 wrote:SKY SPORTS this morning starting the build up to Saturdays game with Chelsea , they have shown this seasons stats so far comparing Bravo and Chelsea Keeper Courtois .......... for all the knockers out there Bravo,s stats are better than Courtois and Chelsea are top of the league !
I am a fan of Bravo but was amazed at said stats , it just shows what a good keeper he is even with a defence in front of him that is still learning a system and finding its feet .
Some sarcastic souls might think you're being a bit generous there No.64.
Elevating our back players to the status of being "a defence" might suggest a degree of organisation.
(just joking![]()
)
I've recently taken to referring to it as our "back line" if that helps at all?
Even calling it a line is generous considering the way Otamendi 'defends'.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:aaron bond wrote:Socrates wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:City64 wrote:SKY SPORTS this morning starting the build up to Saturdays game with Chelsea , they have shown this seasons stats so far comparing Bravo and Chelsea Keeper Courtois .......... for all the knockers out there Bravo,s stats are better than Courtois and Chelsea are top of the league !
I am a fan of Bravo but was amazed at said stats , it just shows what a good keeper he is even with a defence in front of him that is still learning a system and finding its feet .
Some sarcastic souls might think you're being a bit generous there No.64.
Elevating our back players to the status of being "a defence" might suggest a degree of organisation.
(just joking![]()
)
I've recently taken to referring to it as our "back line" if that helps at all?
Even calling it a line is generous considering the way Otamendi 'defends'.
It's a difficult proposition altogether.
There must be some suitable description somewhere, but I don't for the life of me know where to search for it.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 111 guests