Football Media

[nottsblue]

Back page of the Sun says Klopp wants Aubameyang for £40m. Could of swore he would've cost us £65m last summer?

Big disparity there. Wonder why...

[mr_nool]

SSN just now

ROMELU LUKAKU
DIEGO COSTA
ZLATAN IBRAHIMOVIC
HARRY KANE
ALEXIS SANCHEZ

and ....wait for it

JERMAINE DEFOE !!

Who will win the PL Golden Boot and how fortuitous we don't have to mention anybody from City ... shame they couldn't squeeze a red dipper in there

It's the top 6 of the top scorer list a the moment, though. And considering that Kun is three goals behind the lowest scorers, Kane and Defoe, I don't think it's a very strange call to leave him out.

[johnny crossan]

SSN just now

ROMELU LUKAKU
DIEGO COSTA
ZLATAN IBRAHIMOVIC
HARRY KANE
ALEXIS SANCHEZ

and ....wait for it

JERMAINE DEFOE !!

Who will win the PL Golden Boot and how fortuitous we don't have to mention anybody from City ... shame they couldn't squeeze a red dipper in there

It's the top 6 of the top scorer list a the moment, though. And considering that Kun is three goals behind the lowest scorers, Kane and Defoe, I don't think it's a very strange call to leave him out.

I know it's the golden boot current leaders and I agree it's not at all strange for Sky to omit any mention of us at all in their 15 minute PL review slot, that is my point really.

[johnny crossan]

I had to check I wasn't still watching comedy central when I heard what they were saying. The analysis is beyond shite. Thank fuck I was there to see it with my own eyes, because whatever they portrayed was not a true reflection. However tomorrow morning you will all go into work and be faced with MOTD watching morons who believe they know everything based upon the the Jenas and neville show. ....Spurs...Utd...Spurs...Utd....to me....to you.... to me.... to you....

It's just the same

Comical beyond belief........ "My teams better than your team......... no.......My teams better than your team"

Watch on youtube.com

[patrickblue]

The first time they have ever recognised Aguero's standing and it's purely to have a dig at city for dropping him.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/r ... ro-9768273

Poor dears had a conflict of interest to deal with there, didn't they

[PrezIke]

BBC opt for the rags game at Leicester to take precedence over our game v Swansea. What a fookin surprise!

I suppose it was because Leicester are the champions, even though their title defence is now looking a bit sickly.

The added spice of The Scum beating them, obviously justified and suited their sycophantic adherence to the Sky agenda.

Phil Neville believes the rags have the best squad in depth and the best starting 11 to challenge Chelsea for the title. No says Jenas spurs have the best starting 11.

Rivalling BT punditry tonight gents

You can smell their fear lol

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Also, the reason I believe they were right to compare was based upon form. I think that's why they left us, Liverpool and Arsenal out of the discussion. They were asking if United was up to the same level as Spurs who are technically closest to challenging Chelsea. However, I know we are only 1 point behind Spurs, but the other clubs aren't far off as well. I am not suggesting there is not bias, as we know both of where their allegiances lay. We have won our last few games, but I can see why one could leave us out before a few more wins off from the same discussion. In the end, it was raised after United win 4-0 and we barely escaped at home 2-1.

[City64]

BBC opt for the rags game at Leicester to take precedence over our game v Swansea. What a fookin surprise!

I suppose it was because Leicester are the champions, even though their title defence is now looking a bit sickly.

The added spice of The Scum beating them, obviously justified and suited their sycophantic adherence to the Sky agenda.

Phil Neville believes the rags have the best squad in depth and the best starting 11 to challenge Chelsea for the title. No says Jenas spurs have the best starting 11.

Rivalling BT punditry tonight gents

You can smell their fear lol

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate really actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Are you defending Neville , Jenas and MTOD 2 ????

[Foreverinbluedreams]

BBC opt for the rags game at Leicester to take precedence over our game v Swansea. What a fookin surprise!

I suppose it was because Leicester are the champions, even though their title defence is now looking a bit sickly.

The added spice of The Scum beating them, obviously justified and suited their sycophantic adherence to the Sky agenda.

Phil Neville believes the rags have the best squad in depth and the best starting 11 to challenge Chelsea for the title. No says Jenas spurs have the best starting 11.

Rivalling BT punditry tonight gents

You can smell their fear lol

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

[PrezIke]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate really actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Are you defending Neville , Jenas and MTOD 2 ????

I've criticised his analysis before, most recently on his Sterling assessment earlier this season, but on some level yes I am, and I don't like him for obvious reasons.

I know this isn't going to be popular, but it isn't like I am exactly a Utd supporter. I hate them.

[PrezIke]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

Perhaps I misheard, for some reason I thought I heard it differently.

[johnny crossan]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

Perhaps I misheard, for some reason I thought I heard it differently.

just stick your pinky on the play button, adjust your auditory orifices and repent.

Watch on youtube.com

[carl_feedthegoat]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

Perhaps I misheard, for some reason I thought I heard it differently.

There is a golden rule - anything RAT BOY or his Special needs brother says, is total bullshit.

[london blue 2]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

Perhaps I misheard, for some reason I thought I heard it differently.

Best squad to challenge Chelsea wasn't it. Same thing. Both tits.

[City64]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

Perhaps I misheard, for some reason I thought I heard it differently.

just stick your pinky on the play button, adjust your auditory orifices and repent.

Watch on youtube.com

Chuckle .

[City64]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

Perhaps I misheard, for some reason I thought I heard it differently.

There is a golden rule - anything RAT BOY or his Special needs brother says, is total bullshit.

Chuckle .

[PrezIke]

Not to be crass, but was that what they were saying? I thought I heard Neville suggest that compared to Spurs United had more depth. I don't recall him comparing it to anyone else. Jenas agreed with the depth argument, but said Spurs had a better starting eleven.

More importantly, was their debate actually about challenging for the title or just suggesting who "should" be? I think that was the point. Neville was quite critical of United as I recall for their performances not being up to par with the quality they possess.

I will go back and watch that part again later to check.

Chuckle2 said out of them all( so comparing to everyone )the rags are best equipped to challenge for a title in terms of quality in depth ( he acknowledged they're out of this year's title race ). Jenas questioned whether Chuckle2 believed the rags had the best starting XI and then said he believes Spurs do.

Perhaps I misheard, for some reason I thought I heard it differently.

just stick your pinky on the play button, adjust your auditory orifices and repent.

Watch on youtube.com

Chuckle .

haha...well played. I stand corrected.

[City64]

Prezlke is learning .......... good lad !

[Original Dub]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ed-9782332

No one wants him apparently...

[The Maine Man]

I had to check I wasn't still watching comedy central when I heard what they were saying. The analysis is beyond shite. Thank fuck I was there to see it with my own eyes, because whatever they portrayed was not a true reflection. However tomorrow morning you will all go into work and be faced with MOTD watching morons who believe they know everything based upon the the Jenas and neville show. ....Spurs...Utd...Spurs...Utd....to me....to you.... to me.... to you....

It's just the same

Comical beyond belief........ "My teams better than your team......... no.......My teams better than your team"

Watch on youtube.com

Oh dear Mr Jenas. Spoke out of turn and had to dig himself out there. You could almost see the hands being drawn across throats in the background. Laughable punditry.

[Mikhail Chigorin]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/paris-saint-germain-not-interested-9782332

No one wants him apparently...

Hmmmm.

This 'report' seems to be a little thin on direct quotes to substantiate this 'story'. Very puzzling.

On the other hand, PSG are supposedly wanting someone who can both lead the line and play on the flanks; looks as though they'll be coming for Gabriel Jesus, on that basis.


Who the deuce reads and believes such twaddle, spewed out by 'reporters' who are a disgrace to the journalistic profession ??