iwasthere2012 wrote:Last nights game had absolutely everything for a neutral MC and was a great advertisement for the competition.
This despite us having to fight against dubious refereeing yet again.
I suppose even that too added to the spectacle.
How could they report any otherwise.?
I suppose it hasn't stopped them in the past.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:I read a report of last night's game in the Mirror today ( OK OK, I know I shouldn't have but I was at the hospital and it was on the table in the waiting room) and I was expecting a load of drivel to be spouted.
I was completely surprised because, although they criticised our defensive shortcomings (as well as those of Monaco, to be fair), the article was, overall, absolutely gushing at the game itself as a spectacle, at the attacking football on display and, especially, at the way we picked ourselves up off the floor, to come back and win.
It also extolled Pep's principles with regard to how the game should be played and, although they characterised his approach to that of being a gambler who was prepared to commit players forward just to outscore the opposition, they described it such a way that it came over as a virtue (which it is).
After the way they have slated us in the past, I just couldn't believe what I was reading and, when I'd finished, I didn't feel quite so dirty as when I first picked the paper up...........
.........mind you, the entire back page was virtually devoted to Shrek's forthcoming career change in China, so they didn't really divert from type.
Nevertheless, it was still a good report and quite unexpected.
Justified logic wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:I read a report of last night's game in the Mirror today ( OK OK, I know I shouldn't have but I was at the hospital and it was on the table in the waiting room) and I was expecting a load of drivel to be spouted.
I was completely surprised because, although they criticised our defensive shortcomings (as well as those of Monaco, to be fair), the article was, overall, absolutely gushing at the game itself as a spectacle, at the attacking football on display and, especially, at the way we picked ourselves up off the floor, to come back and win.
It also extolled Pep's principles with regard to how the game should be played and, although they characterised his approach to that of being a gambler who was prepared to commit players forward just to outscore the opposition, they described it such a way that it came over as a virtue (which it is).
After the way they have slated us in the past, I just couldn't believe what I was reading and, when I'd finished, I didn't feel quite so dirty as when I first picked the paper up...........
.........mind you, the entire back page was virtually devoted to Shrek's forthcoming career change in China, so they didn't really divert from type.
Nevertheless, it was still a good report and quite unexpected.
So, what did they prescribe for your hallucinations?
london blue 2 wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Sky's piece on the game is embarrassing. Imagine if we'd have lost...
Not seen mate, any chance of a heads up?
Not much to tell mate. 30 secs of a pep post match presser, run through of scorers and into pie gate...
Beefymcfc wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Sky's piece on the game is embarrassing. Imagine if we'd have lost...
Not seen mate, any chance of a heads up?
Not much to tell mate. 30 secs of a pep post match presser, run through of scorers and into pie gate...
Much like the rest of the media, it was as if we'd never played in one of the most entertaining games in modern CL history. These games are notorious for teams not wanting to give an inch but to get 2 teams going at it like that really does do a lot for the CL, and English clubs.
london blue 2 wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Sky's piece on the game is embarrassing. Imagine if we'd have lost...
Not seen mate, any chance of a heads up?
Not much to tell mate. 30 secs of a pep post match presser, run through of scorers and into pie gate...
Much like the rest of the media, it was as if we'd never played in one of the most entertaining games in modern CL history. These games are notorious for teams not wanting to give an inch but to get 2 teams going at it like that really does do a lot for the CL, and English clubs.
Not that interested now they don't have all the match rights are they. Total wankers feeding the masses instead of simply reporting sporting news.
I'm a hypocrite though as I can't live without my sky package.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:Last nights game had absolutely everything for a neutral MC and was a great advertisement for the competition.
This despite us having to fight against dubious refereeing yet again.
I suppose even that too added to the spectacle.
How could they report any otherwise.?
I suppose it hasn't stopped them in the past.
It, more often than not, takes two teams to make a great and memorable football match, so it's all credit to Monaco for what they put into it last night. As you so rightly say, it had everything for a neutral and, with performances like that, we could easily become everyone's favourite second team.
You certainly have a habit of choosing great games to come over to watch; you ought to do it more often.![]()
Anyway, are you back home now and have you fully 'recovered' yet ??
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:I read a report of last night's game in the Mirror today ( OK OK, I know I shouldn't have but I was at the hospital and it was on the table in the waiting room) and I was expecting a load of drivel to be spouted.
I was completely surprised because, although they criticised our defensive shortcomings (as well as those of Monaco, to be fair), the article was, overall, absolutely gushing at the game itself as a spectacle, at the attacking football on display and, especially, at the way we picked ourselves up off the floor, to come back and win.
It also extolled Pep's principles with regard to how the game should be played and, although they characterised his approach to that of being a gambler who was prepared to commit players forward just to outscore the opposition, they described it such a way that it came over as a virtue (which it is).
After the way they have slated us in the past, I just couldn't believe what I was reading and, when I'd finished, I didn't feel quite so dirty as when I first picked the paper up...........
.........mind you, the entire back page was virtually devoted to Shrek's forthcoming career change in China, so they didn't really divert from type.
Nevertheless, it was still a good report and quite unexpected.
City64 wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:I read a report of last night's game in the Mirror today ( OK OK, I know I shouldn't have but I was at the hospital and it was on the table in the waiting room) and I was expecting a load of drivel to be spouted.
I was completely surprised because, although they criticised our defensive shortcomings (as well as those of Monaco, to be fair), the article was, overall, absolutely gushing at the game itself as a spectacle, at the attacking football on display and, especially, at the way we picked ourselves up off the floor, to come back and win.
It also extolled Pep's principles with regard to how the game should be played and, although they characterised his approach to that of being a gambler who was prepared to commit players forward just to outscore the opposition, they described it such a way that it came over as a virtue (which it is).
After the way they have slated us in the past, I just couldn't believe what I was reading and, when I'd finished, I didn't feel quite so dirty as when I first picked the paper up...........
.........mind you, the entire back page was virtually devoted to Shrek's forthcoming career change in China, so they didn't really divert from type.
Nevertheless, it was still a good report and quite unexpected.
That most likely would have been written and edited by Andy Dunn who is one the best sports editors out there to be honest , a very fair guy who knows his stuff . Although he is a dipper through and through he is far too good for the Mirror and it is very strange how all the rag shite portrayed by said Mirror gets by him with him being a dipper and all that ???
Justified logic wrote:Talkshite are in their element this week. Fatboy Holmes and Rachel 'Nice Figure' Riley yesterday and Fatboy Holmes and Ray 'Over The Limit' Wilkins today talking all things United, Rooney and China.
patrickblue wrote:Bring back Carol I say. Much more interesting, even if shes now an OAP.
And talking of granny shagging, what do they think of it in China?
Justified logic wrote:Talkshite are in their element this week. Fatboy Holmes and Rachel 'Nice Figure' Riley yesterday and Fatboy Holmes and Ray 'Over The Limit' Wilkins today talking all things United, Rooney and China.
john@staustell wrote:Justified logic wrote:Talkshite are in their element this week. Fatboy Holmes and Rachel 'Nice Figure' Riley yesterday and Fatboy Holmes and Ray 'Over The Limit' Wilkins today talking all things United, Rooney and China.
Got in the car this morning, 3 seconds of Holmes and the drunk and I was off to Capital. Holmes just talks boring shite and Wilkins, without his licence, is about as patronising as it gets. And biased.
I'll be giving breakfast a miss until Big Al comes back off holidays. Makes a nice change for him to be off on holiday - usually he's off sick - but the entertainment levels dive when he isn't in.
john@staustell wrote:Justified logic wrote:Talkshite are in their element this week. Fatboy Holmes and Rachel 'Nice Figure' Riley yesterday and Fatboy Holmes and Ray 'Over The Limit' Wilkins today talking all things United, Rooney and China.
Got in the car this morning, 3 seconds of Holmes and the drunk and I was off to Capital. Holmes just talks boring shite and Wilkins, without his licence, is about as patronising as it gets. And biased.
I'll be giving breakfast a miss until Big Al comes back off holidays. Makes a nice change for him to be off on holiday - usually he's off sick - but the entertainment levels dive when he isn't in.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Personally, I always thought her posterior was far too large and almost unnatural in it's dimensions, given her more slender overall figure.
Wonderwall wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Personally, I always thought her posterior was far too large and almost unnatural in it's dimensions, given her more slender overall figure.
Nicest description of the word fat arse I have ever read.
Too quality MC
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Scatman and 113 guests