LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one
And there's the other one I was referring to.
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Mase wrote:LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one
Hmmmm been missing for about 3 months of us getting fucked over then BAM! out of nowhere back when we get a favourable decision. Interesting.
Hes the fuckign pioneer of the ''No agenda here ,move on movement''...a sly cunt who stays under his rock when the bias is at fever pitch then slithers out like the slimy reptile he is when we get a decision for us.
Utter cunt.
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one
Mase wrote:LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one
Hmmmm been missing for about 3 months of us getting fucked over then BAM! out of nowhere back when we get a favourable decision. Interesting.
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!
He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.
johnny crossan wrote:dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!
He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.
not a happy juxtaposition perhaps
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:johnny crossan wrote:dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!
He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.
not a happy juxtaposition perhaps
Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".
Daz, you have been reported for foul language.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:johnny crossan wrote:dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!
He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.
not a happy juxtaposition perhaps
Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".
Daz, you have been reported for foul language.
Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.
You get 9 out of 10 from me.
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.
Beefymcfc wrote:MC, do you think Pep wants the Knuckler in midfield or does he want the Passer there? Personally, I'm with you, I'd want an enforcer in there but I'm not sure if PG would look at that.
Interesting that you mention the forwards, we went from 4 to 1 and I'm still not sure if we've still got 2 out and out strikers. Was this caused by us knowing what Pep wanted, and accorded early?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:johnny crossan wrote:dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!
He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.
not a happy juxtaposition perhaps
Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".
Daz, you have been reported for foul language.
Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.
You get 9 out of 10 from me.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:johnny crossan wrote:dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!
He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.
not a happy juxtaposition perhaps
Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".
Daz, you have been reported for foul language.
Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.
You get 9 out of 10 from me.
I knew you'd nod approvingly. Though you yourself have become soft as fuck grandfather figure. What the hell happened to capitals, calling every fucking cunt cunt and having multiple rows going on at the same time?
To be fair, I apologized to Beefy last night via PM as I might've been slightly out of order after couple of beers and absolutely terrible result.
City64 wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:johnny crossan wrote:dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!
He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.
not a happy juxtaposition perhaps
Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".
Daz, you have been reported for foul language.
Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.
You get 9 out of 10 from me.
Your easily pleased Carl , maybe now Vinny is back to his best your attention span has wained ???
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.
South Stand Balti wrote:zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.
No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.
zuricity wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.
No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.
No wonder some get all hot under the collar on here!
I meant "The game" , where did i mention any foul by anyone?
South Stand Balti wrote:zuricity wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.
No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.
No wonder some get all hot under the collar on here!
I meant "The game" , where did i mention any foul by anyone?
Doh! Sorry, I'd been discussing the Dhino hand off and assumed you meant that. The first half was poor but we were better in the second half after the subs and change in set up. We didn't have anyone running the game though in the absence of Yaya and Silva
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, dick dastardley, salford city and 144 guests