Mikhail Chigorin wrote:One of my chums told me last night that, a week or more ago, he had seen some sort of analysis in which the average cost of a season ticket was divided by the number of goals scored (at home in the League) by Premier League teams, to give a pseudo table of the worst offenders/value for money.
It's all a bit contrived and I don't know how viable it is but, perhaps unsurprisingly, Arsenal were the worst placed in number one slot, followed by Tottingham and then the Scum in third place.
I thought the Scum in third spot was questionable as, to my mind, they should have been competing for the first place but, interestingly (or not), Southampton were in fourth place, followed by West Ham in fifth.
He didn't know where City were placed in any such list but I just hope that, next season, we score so many goals that if this analysis were to be repeated, we end up in bottom place.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:One of my chums told me last night that, a week or more ago, he had seen some sort of analysis in which the average cost of a season ticket was divided by the number of goals scored (at home in the League) by Premier League teams, to give a pseudo table of the worst offenders/value for money.
It's all a bit contrived and I don't know how viable it is but, perhaps unsurprisingly, Arsenal were the worst placed in number one slot, followed by Tottingham and then the Scum in third place.
I thought the Scum in third spot was questionable as, to my mind, they should have been competing for the first place but, interestingly (or not), Southampton were in fourth place, followed by West Ham in fifth.
He didn't know where City were placed in any such list but I just hope that, next season, we score so many goals that if this analysis were to be repeated, we end up in bottom place.
Table can be found here MC
http://www.manchestercity.vitalfootball ... p?a=582353
Original article table is based on is here
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/footba ... tgalleries
PrezIke wrote:Lukaku set to snub United for Chelsea...
CuteMancs wrote:Good start to life as a rag...
http://www.tmz.com/2017/07/08/romelu-lu ... -arrested/
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:One of my chums told me last night that, a week or more ago, he had seen some sort of analysis in which the average cost of a season ticket was divided by the number of goals scored (at home in the League) by Premier League teams, to give a pseudo table of the worst offenders/value for money.
It's all a bit contrived and I don't know how viable it is but, perhaps unsurprisingly, Arsenal were the worst placed in number one slot, followed by Tottingham and then the Scum in third place.
I thought the Scum in third spot was questionable as, to my mind, they should have been competing for the first place but, interestingly (or not), Southampton were in fourth place, followed by West Ham in fifth.
He didn't know where City were placed in any such list but I just hope that, next season, we score so many goals that if this analysis were to be repeated, we end up in bottom place.
Table can be found here MC
http://www.manchestercity.vitalfootball ... p?a=582353
Original article table is based on is here
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/footba ... tgalleries
Thanks FIBD.
My chum couldn't remember where he'd seen it but, since he's a Newcastle fan, it's quite understandable.
PrezIke wrote:Now reportedly £100m, which apparently Everton wanted for him, is the deal and why Chelsea will supposedly miss out.
£15m in easily met add ons + £10m rated Shrek
More than Pogba. Amazing.
Even by Friday night, however, Chelsea had feared Lukaku’s representative, Mino Raiola, was intent on pushing his client towards Old Trafford, where he successfully moved Pogba, Henrikh Mkhitaryan and Zlatan Ibrahimovic last summer. The London club, when submitting their bid, had indicated they were unprepared to match the agent fee – apparently amounting to eight figures – on offer to Raiola from United and, instead, felt as if they had presented Lukaku with a simple choice: push to join the club for whom he had initially been so anxious to play again, albeit against his agent’s financial interest; or sign for United in the knowledge Raiola will secure a bigger fee from the deal.
City64 wrote:PrezIke wrote:Lukaku set to snub United for Chelsea...
£75 mill or face value £35 mill ?
Justified logic wrote:PrezIke wrote:Now reportedly £100m, which apparently Everton wanted for him, is the deal and why Chelsea will supposedly miss out.
£15m in easily met add ons + £10m rated Shrek
More than Pogba. Amazing.
It's now the new currency, the Lukaku.
From the Guardian...Even by Friday night, however, Chelsea had feared Lukaku’s representative, Mino Raiola, was intent on pushing his client towards Old Trafford, where he successfully moved Pogba, Henrikh Mkhitaryan and Zlatan Ibrahimovic last summer. The London club, when submitting their bid, had indicated they were unprepared to match the agent fee – apparently amounting to eight figures – on offer to Raiola from United and, instead, felt as if they had presented Lukaku with a simple choice: push to join the club for whom he had initially been so anxious to play again, albeit against his agent’s financial interest; or sign for United in the knowledge Raiola will secure a bigger fee from the deal.
Raiola must have seen Woodwood coming.
Justified logic wrote:PrezIke wrote:Now reportedly £100m, which apparently Everton wanted for him, is the deal and why Chelsea will supposedly miss out.
£15m in easily met add ons + £10m rated Shrek
More than Pogba. Amazing.
It's now the new currency, the Lukaku.
From the Guardian...Even by Friday night, however, Chelsea had feared Lukaku’s representative, Mino Raiola, was intent on pushing his client towards Old Trafford, where he successfully moved Pogba, Henrikh Mkhitaryan and Zlatan Ibrahimovic last summer. The London club, when submitting their bid, had indicated they were unprepared to match the agent fee – apparently amounting to eight figures – on offer to Raiola from United and, instead, felt as if they had presented Lukaku with a simple choice: push to join the club for whom he had initially been so anxious to play again, albeit against his agent’s financial interest; or sign for United in the knowledge Raiola will secure a bigger fee from the deal.
Raiola must have seen Woodwood coming.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
nottsblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Superb statistic
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], patrickblue and 193 guests