PeterParker wrote:How many more since he becomes the best goalscorer of the club?
PeterParker wrote:How many more since he becomes the best goalscorer of the club?
PeterParker wrote:How many more since he becomes the best goalscorer of the club?
Original Dub wrote:The most clinical finisher in premier league history.
nottsblue wrote:Original Dub wrote:The most clinical finisher in premier league history.
I'd actually argue he is the most prolific. In terms of goals per minutes. But for me, he misses too many good chances to be classed as the most clinical.
nottsblue wrote:Original Dub wrote:The most clinical finisher in premier league history.
I'd actually argue he is the most prolific. In terms of goals per minutes. But for me, he misses too many good chances to be classed as the most clinical.
Original Dub wrote:nottsblue wrote:Original Dub wrote:The most clinical finisher in premier league history.
I'd actually argue he is the most prolific. In terms of goals per minutes. But for me, he misses too many good chances to be classed as the most clinical.
Good point. Probably the wrong term.
It would be interesting to see stats for the most clinical strikers in that bracket. ie how many chances per goals.
Probably no hope of those knocking around?
FIBD??
Chinners wrote:Clinical sminical, I don't give a shyte if he misses 3 chances every game ...171 goals in 257 games is all anyone needs to know, fantastic strike rate in any league in the world!
Original Dub wrote:nottsblue wrote:Original Dub wrote:The most clinical finisher in premier league history.
I'd actually argue he is the most prolific. In terms of goals per minutes. But for me, he misses too many good chances to be classed as the most clinical.
Good point. Probably the wrong term.
It would be interesting to see stats for the most clinical strikers in that bracket. ie how many chances per goals.
Probably no hope of those knocking around?
FIBD??
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Original Dub wrote:nottsblue wrote:Original Dub wrote:The most clinical finisher in premier league history.
I'd actually argue he is the most prolific. In terms of goals per minutes. But for me, he misses too many good chances to be classed as the most clinical.
Good point. Probably the wrong term.
It would be interesting to see stats for the most clinical strikers in that bracket. ie how many chances per goals.
Probably no hope of those knocking around?
FIBD??
Sorry OD, I've looked but can't find anything.
Interesting debate, which criteria should be used to determine most clinical?
I would be inclined to say that minutes per goal should be the one to go with as ratio depends on type of shots and from where you're shooting so more difficult to define, penalty takers stats would be boosted in shot to goals ratios for example.
Notts is right in regards Nacho, he has a better ratio than Aguero over the past two seasons.
nottsblue wrote:Jesus is shaping up nicely as well
Dunnylad wrote:It's sad that Aguero has his value constantly undermined by the press, whether Pep intends it or not. He might not be in the same mould as Zabba for Mancness but I doubt we'll know what we've got until he's gone.
Hats off to a player who should be a premier league legend let alone a MCFC one
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Hazy2, Mase, Nigels Tackle, Scatman and 164 guests