iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
dazby wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
Isn't that an Underworld song?
iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
Swales4ever wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?
glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...
can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.
iwasthere2012 wrote:Swales4ever wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?
glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...
can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.
Sorry, am I being told off here?
It's hard to tell.
Swales4ever wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:Swales4ever wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?
glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...
can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.
Sorry, am I being told off here?
It's hard to tell.
nevermind, mate.
I just hoped I could have learned something.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Swales4ever wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:Swales4ever wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?
it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?
glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...
can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.
Sorry, am I being told off here?
It's hard to tell.
nevermind, mate.
I just hoped I could have learned something.
Here's something to learn S4E; 'always take your mother-in-law some lettuce on a Sunday'.![]()
![]()
Years ago, an old geezer I used to work with gave me that advice and it's stuck with me ever since.
johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so
South Stand Balti wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so
That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.
South Stand Balti wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so
That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.
South Stand Balti wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so
That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.
johnny crossan wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so
That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.
Well there is that I suppose
City64 wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so
That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.
He is probably the worst on twitter who tweets City stuff Balti lad . Bet Benidorm was bouncing with that City performance at Stamford Bridge pal ?
PeterParker wrote:Just read also that Milan rumour.
Would you sell him next summer for 100 mil if somebody would pay that much for him?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, blues2win, Hazy2, john@staustell, Nigels Tackle, PeterParker, Pretty Boy Lee and 148 guests