*** city v burnley*** official match thread

[Peter Doherty (AGAIG)]

Goalkeeper knelt on Silva's foot, definite penalty.

[Original Dub]

Goalkeeper knelt on Silva's foot, definite penalty.

For sure.

The call for a red was bizarre

[phips]

It’s along afternoon yet.
How have we been playing.

Not well

Needs to freshen it up?

Would like to see Gundo on.
KDB looks well off the pace.

agreed. KDB not been his usual self.

total domination in terms of possession but not creating a lot. Bernardo has had 2 shots in the box blocked close to the line but thats about it.

[walshawblue]

According to talk shite it was a certain dive and he will get a ban ,fucking wankers

[Peter Doherty (AGAIG)]

Goalkeeper knelt on Silva's foot, definite penalty.

For sure.

The call for a red was bizarre

Don't think it was a red under the old rules but under the new ones definitely not.

[BlueinBosnia]

Def penalty, but I don't think it was a red either .... nice early goal second half please and then canter to the end

Of course it wasn't a red... I don't know that guy is on

But you think his leg was "twisted under the keeper"?

No.
I think his foot got trapped and turned under the keeper's leg and skidded.

Actually, there's video evidence. Why am I explaining it to you?

Well, either my stream or yours is crappy. In mine, his foot vaguely changed direction upon contact, but in no way was it "twisted under the keeper". That's exaggeration of the highest order.

[Peter Doherty (AGAIG)]

According to talk shite it was a certain dive and he will get a ban ,fucking wankers

Why listen to those cunts? They are the scum of the earth.

[Foreverinbluedreams]

Why is there a debate on the penalty? They don't come more clear cut.

[bigblue]

Well, either my stream or yours is crappy. In mine, his foot vaguely changed direction upon contact, but in no way was it "twisted under the keeper". That's exaggeration of the highest order.

Your stream must be shite

[mr_nool]

Def penalty, but I don't think it was a red either .... nice early goal second half please and then canter to the end

Of course it wasn't a red... I don't know that guy is on

But you think his leg was "twisted under the keeper"?

No.
I think his foot got trapped and turned under the keeper's leg and skidded.

Actually, there's video evidence. Why am I explaining it to you?

Well, either my stream or yours is crappy. In mine, his foot vaguely changed direction upon contact, but in no way was it "twisted under the keeper". That's exaggeration of the highest order.

His foot was stuck under the keeper, so he couldn't make the next step. I think bit would have been very difficult for him to stay on his feet even if he'd wanted to.

[PrezIke]

NBC says clear pen

[carl_feedthegoat]

Well, either my stream or yours is crappy. In mine, his foot vaguely changed direction upon contact, but in no way was it "twisted under the keeper". That's exaggeration of the highest order.

Your stream must be shite

Nice one..I really dont know what some people actually think they see ffs..even in normal time his foot was under his knee.Clear penalty.

[BlueinBosnia]

Why is there a debate on the penalty? They don't come more clear cut.

I agree, but I've seen those not given. Also very unlucky for Burnley to concede a pen like that with what seemed to be an unnecessary, non-rash, and not malicious challenge.

[dazby]

Doing enough after a big week. More of the same should see us home.

[Original Dub]

Well, either my stream or yours is crappy. In mine, his foot vaguely changed direction upon contact, but in no way was it "twisted under the keeper". That's exaggeration of the highest order.

Your stream must be shite

Thank you.

If you need a link to a good stream BiB, let me know. We wouldn't want anyone making a cunt out of themselves trying to be smart

[carl_feedthegoat]

Why is there a debate on the penalty? They don't come more clear cut.

I agree, but I've seen those not given. Also very unlucky for Burnley to concede a pen like that with what seemed to be an unnecessary, non-rash, and not malicious challenge.

So if you agree whats with the fuckign sarcasm on OD post ???

Weird.

[Justified logic]

Well, either my stream or yours is crappy. In mine, his foot vaguely changed direction upon contact, but in no way was it "twisted under the keeper". That's exaggeration of the highest order.

Your stream must be shite

I'm not convinced. Don't think he'd get a retrospective though.

[bigblue]

I'm not convinced. Don't think he'd get a retrospective though.

based on your posts, I take it your name is ironic?

[Original Dub]

Well, either my stream or yours is crappy. In mine, his foot vaguely changed direction upon contact, but in no way was it "twisted under the keeper". That's exaggeration of the highest order.

Your stream must be shite

I'm not convinced. Don't think he'd get a retrospective though.

[Saul Goodman]

That was close. Better keep us on our toes